Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

167 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
1,963 posts
10,936 battles
53 minutes ago, Mr_Damager said:

Try to google "SBMM", fanboy.

It's sad that you feel obliged to play this game because of sunk cost fallacy (more or less according to your own words).

 

However, do please look into 

 

a. gitting gud

b. better insults

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
2,062 posts
18,457 battles
1 hour ago, Mr_Damager said:

Even if it weren't rigged, it would still be unfair. Random can't be fair.

obviously when one has no evidence to show, one backpaddles. Nice. 

 

And all of a sudden, the tinfoil hattery becomes ballsy attitude.

1 hour ago, Mr_Damager said:

face it, fanboy.

1 hour ago, Mr_Damager said:

Good job, fanboy

58 minutes ago, Mr_Damager said:

Try to google "SBMM", fanboy.

Look here, our lil scrub is a feisty one. That's why he is sporting a pompous name, alas devoid of content.

 

1 hour ago, Mr_Damager said:

I continue to play this game (mostly in PVE) just because I put some money/time/effort in it in the past (that was my fault, my mistake). If I could take it all back, I wouldn't play or be here hoping that something will change in the future.

But this line borders clinical psychopathy. A sunken cost fallacy victim that self flagellates. He wastes his time in an activity that he abhors, knowingly that nothing will change,  instead of doing something that would bring him joy and satisfaction.

 

Your first posts made me think you are an obnoxious person. Now, I think you are just sad. I ll let you keep your tin foil hat and sport it along with your pompous name. Which, by the way, is not devoid of content. You are truthful to your self chosen name. It is just that you like damaging yourself.

 

I remain, your fanboy

Salt

  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,963 posts
10,936 battles
9 minutes ago, Saltface said:

But this line borders clinical psychopathy. A sunken cost fallacy victim that self flagellates. He wastes his time in an activity that he abhors, knowingly that nothing will change,  instead of doing something that would bring him joy and satisfaction.

 

I realise you're shipposting, but this is hardly unusual.

 

After all, this is the ultimate aim of games like this... turning the game into a habit, that you feel you must play (and occasionally pay for) whether you like it or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,029 battles
1 minute ago, arttuperkunas said:

After all, this is the ultimate aim of games like this... turning the game into a habit, that you feel you must play (and occasionally pay for) whether you like it or not.

 

That truely is a vicious cycle. Luckily i escaped it. You have to objectively look at how much fun it really is. Couple of years ago, it wasnt for me. When you are often angry, then you really have to step back and look at yourself. Took almost a year break. Now i just play to have fun. If i dont have fun, i stop. Randoms f.e. Ranked is ok from time to time (for now, soon with subs, nope, no thanks). And OPs, there you can have fun by going in guns blazing. Also you have to conquer FOMO and ignore all the missions and carrots WG is feeding us. Dont play what the game is telling you to play - play what you want to play. Why do you need the 349th ship anyway?

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NFOE]
Players
422 posts
6 minutes ago, arttuperkunas said:

It's sad that you feel obliged to play this game because of sunk cost fallacy (more or less according to your own words).

Exactly. I still play World of Tanks for the same reason. And I'm sure there are many other players who cannot just quit because they've invested a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,963 posts
10,936 battles
2 minutes ago, Mr_Damager said:

Exactly. I still play World of Tanks for the same reason. And I'm sure there are many other players who cannot just quit because they've invested a lot.

sounds like they gotcha good.

 

3 minutes ago, DFens_666 said:

 

That truely is a vicious cycle. Luckily i escaped it. You have to objectively look at how much fun it really is. Couple of years ago, it wasnt for me. When you are often angry, then you really have to step back and look at yourself. Took almost a year break. Now i just play to have fun. If i dont have fun, i stop. Randoms f.e. Ranked is ok from time to time (for now, soon with subs, nope, no thanks). And OPs, there you can have fun by going in guns blazing. Also you have to conquer FOMO and ignore all the missions and carrots WG is feeding us. Dont play what the game is telling you to play - play what you want to play. Why do you need the 349th ship anyway?

 

Welcome back btw. Hope you have fun.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
2,062 posts
18,457 battles
3 minutes ago, arttuperkunas said:

I realise you're shipposting, but this is hardly unusual.

Absolutely not. No shitposting here. However, I dislike his attitude. Very much indeed.

Should he just say "this is bad MM" I would say, yes dude you are right. This is what we can have now.

But he decided to insult instead of arguing. He blames his inaptitude on MM and Player Base. And refuses to even discuss properly. He goes on the "oh my feefees are the only evidence you need" mantra. 

 

8 minutes ago, arttuperkunas said:

turning the game into a habit

and yes, this is true. But this does not turn me into a crap poster.

 

We all know (on this forum) that MM is crap. But, we don't call it rigged. We know the game lacks balance. But, we don't call it rigged. 
 

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,963 posts
10,936 battles
Just now, Saltface said:

Absolutely not. No shitposting here. However, I dislike his attitude. Very much indeed.

Should he just say "this is bad MM" I would say, yes dude you are right. This is what we can have now.

But he decided to insult instead of arguing. He blames his inaptitude on MM and Player Base. And refuses to even discuss properly. He goes on the "oh my feefees are the only evidence you need" mantra. 

 

and yes, this is true. But this does not turn me into a crap poster.

 

We all know (on this forum) that MM is crap. But, we don't call it rigged. We know the game lacks balance. But, we don't call it rigged. 
 

Ok, my bad.

 

I wasn't trying to insult you by talking about shipposting, I just assumed that was your intent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WG Staff
1,664 posts
7,808 battles
2 hours ago, SurfaceFish said:

A question please? Is there a way to be bottom tier more often? I like to be bottom tier playing T8 CV, can earn more credits and farm more damage. 

 

Should I play few T8 CV games then move to a different tier to "reset" the counter?

 

It's the counter specific for individual ship or that tier?

 

Thanks. 

Basically, you can only be bottom tier 3 out of 8 games on a specific tier. This is a specific counter that applies for every single tier. So its still possible to be bottom tier 10 out of 10 games if you play 1 game on each tier.
There isn't really a way to make yourself bottom tier more than this, other than guesstimating when

 

2 hours ago, Mr_Damager said:

There are too many one-sided matches. Bad players (or just players and AI bots along with them) are put in one team on purpose. That's why the team loses quickly without any chance. I don't have any other explanation. And I'm not talking about the averages or the statistics/achievements. I'm talking about how one particular one-sided match occurs. 

Even if it weren't rigged, it would still be unfair. Random can't be fair.

This is just speculation - that is exactly what random is, sometimes you get all the bad players on one side because it doesnt take into account your winrate or damage or whatever.

 

2 hours ago, Mr_Damager said:

Neither rigged MM nor random MM is fair.

And how is random not fair?

 

1 hour ago, hellhound666 said:

im fairly certain that rigging details would be above your (and everybody else in wows eu) pay grade.

i think that wows is manipulating rng

if i would have proof i wouldn't waste it in here

Even if it were true, to what benefit would that be? If you have real proof then where will you take it? I look forward to seeing it.
 

1 hour ago, Mr_Damager said:

Try to google "SBMM", fanboy.

SBMM is not a good idea for the main wows gamemode.

 

Also, everyone who disagrees with you seems to be a fanboy?

 

Fair seas captain!
~Sera

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
2,062 posts
18,457 battles
1 minute ago, arttuperkunas said:

I wasn't trying to insult you by talking about shipposting, I just assumed that was your intent.

No insult taken mate. I welcome all opinions, even the ones I don't like or agree with. And if you prove to me you are right I will stand corrected and admit my wrong.

I wasn't crap posting. I was (and still am) annoyed by this attitude. 

 

I am oldish here. Not as old as @DFens_666 but old enough to remember a forum that I enjoyed. DFens taught me how to play the game. On this forum along with other friends that are now not here. I blame these bad attitudes for the damage.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
2,062 posts
18,457 battles
4 minutes ago, Seraphice said:

And how is random not fair?

equality of outcome vs equality of opportunity

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,978 posts
5 minutes ago, Seraphice said:

Even if it were true, to what benefit would that be? If you have real proof then where will you take it? I look forward to seeing it.

for example to keep returning players happy and gaming by improving their rng 

i didn't say i have proof ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,177 battles
1 minute ago, hellhound666 said:

for example to keep returning players happy and gaming by improving their rng 

i didn't say i have proof ...

There are enough returning players with a drop in performance.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts
17 minutes ago, Saltface said:

No insult taken mate. I welcome all opinions, even the ones I don't like or agree with. And if you prove to me you are right I will stand corrected and admit my wrong.

I wasn't crap posting. I was (and still am) annoyed by this attitude. 

 

I am oldish here. Not as old as @DFens_666 but old enough to remember a forum that I enjoyed. DFens taught me how to play the game. On this forum along with other friends that are now not here. I blame these bad attitudes for the damage.

 

Where do these bad attitudes spring from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts
18 minutes ago, Seraphice said:

Also, everyone who disagrees with you seems to be a fanboy?

Yeah, it's insulting, that's what it is. Also, 4501 to :etc_swear: CVs with, where?

 

26 minutes ago, Mr_Damager said:

Exactly. I still play World of Tanks for the same reason. And I'm sure there are many other players who cannot just quit because they've invested a lot.

Oh boy, that makes you so salty. Pro tip: Quit. Pro tip2: Never do this again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WG Staff
1,664 posts
7,808 battles
1 minute ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

Yeah, it's insulting, that's what it is. Also, 4501 to :etc_swear: CVs with, where?

Wait... Is this Karkong asking for us to introduce more subs?!

 

 

  • Funny 4
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,029 battles
30 minutes ago, arttuperkunas said:

Welcome back btw. Hope you have fun.

 

Thanks :cap_like:

Its ok now. As i said, i found a way to have fun and not get angry with the game (some minor RNG related incidents not included) :cap_haloween:

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,029 battles
6 minutes ago, Karasu_Browarszky said:

 

Where do these bad attitudes spring from?

 

Game is not going the direction people want it to go, so they are getting angry. Thats what i think atleast. You want to enjoy it, but you cant (for whatever reason that might be). And thats the result.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BATES]
Players
559 posts
14,424 battles
10 minutes ago, Seraphice said:

Wait... Is this Karkong asking for us to introduce more subs?!

 

 

If it is Ban him,Quick. We wont snitch.

 

  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts
7 minutes ago, Spartan_Renegade said:

Ranked is packed with potatoes. It's literally unplayable....Im just in it for the steel. 

 

Oh, hey, haven't seen you around for a while. Are you one of them 'returning players'?

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts
49 minutes ago, Seraphice said:

Wait... Is this Karkong asking for us to introduce more subs?!

Only the one designed for ruining a CVs day. Just a little, just as in as much as a CV ruins my gameplay experience. I mean, it even takes me a few minutes to go there with a pack of migraine dildos, it can never be as bad as a surface ship experience. And that's not even counting getting spotted to death....

I even promise to not use it on other targets apart from supershits.... much. :Smile_trollface:

 

PS: I'd even offer to supertest this thing, if you'll have me. No special reason.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
62,162 battles
35 minutes ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

Only the one designed for ruining a CVs day. Just a little, just as in as much as a CV ruins my gameplay experience. I mean, it even takes me a few minutes to go there with a pack of migraine dildos, it can never be as bad as a surface ship experience. And that's not even counting getting spotted to death....

I even promise to not use it on other targets apart from supershits.... much. :Smile_trollface:

 

PS: I'd even offer to supertest this thing, if you'll have me. No special reason.

With the automatic ASW I doubt it will be so much threat to CVs. And if it won't have insane reload - it'll end up being the Paolo Emilio of subs. 

  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts
1 minute ago, KillStealBoss said:

With the automatic ASW I doubt it will be so much threat to CVs. And if it won't have insane reload - it'll end up being the Paolo Emilio of subs. 

 

KillJoy. :Smile_hiding:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[88TH]
Players
1,336 posts
50 minutes ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

Only the one designed for ruining a CVs day. ...

HEy, here's the solution!!!

Make so that subs can damage only CVs, and CVs can spot and attack only subs!

 

It would be interesting, new, and wholeheartedly welcomed by all the majorities (silent and loud and fluid) :Smile_great:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×