Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Barney_Wobba

Historical Server

12 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[OTLWS]
Players
263 posts
5,419 battles

I say 'Historical Server', but it's just another name for 'Classic Server'. A separate server for the older mechanics with RTS CV and no subs. Total fresh start server on all the main WoWs zones.

 

Any takers?

  • Cool 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
143 posts
4,701 battles

I would play that - Wows was much better when CV had limited planes and no subs.

 

But it will never happen, wargaming only want to crank out premium ships that are better than tech tree ships, so people buy them - and then complete the destruction of the game by introducing even more subs and ships that have torps & planes - so at the end the game is about who is better at dodgning torps/attack planes/homing torps than about strategy and knowledge of how and when to shoot.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,177 battles

That is not really historical.

I thought you would propose a WW1-only game mode. That would be interesting. Not that it was proposed dozens of time before...

  • Cool 3
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[C1DFL]
[C1DFL]
Beta Tester
3,604 posts
18,942 battles
Vor 1 Stunde, Barney_Wobba sagte:

A separate server for the older mechanics with RTS CV and no subs.

You forgot stealth fire, battleships undetected smoke firing.

The only "classic server" thing i would second is the return of the mighty T7 Pensacola ;)

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester, In AlfaTesters
5,710 posts
13,400 battles

I am sure You would get a few Hundred Players for that.

But I doubt it would be enough to Justify the Cost for WG.

So I assume You can Bury that Dream.

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts
3 hours ago, Barney_Wobba said:

I say 'Historical Server', but it's just another name for 'Classic Server'. A separate server for the older mechanics with RTS CV and no subs. Total fresh start server on all the main WoWs zones.

 

Any takers?

 

I'd take that in a jiffy.

 

2 hours ago, ColonelPete said:

That is not really historical.

I thought you would propose a WW1-only game mode. That would be interesting. Not that it was proposed dozens of time before...

 

It has, and I'm sure WG has carefully archived every single suggestion.

 

 

Originally, though, I thought OP was talking about the state of the antique servers WG is running, but both the WW1 game mode and the Classic Server are good suggestions.

 

 

1 hour ago, togMOR said:

You forgot stealth fire, battleships undetected smoke firing.

The only "classic server" thing i would second is the return of the mighty T7 Pensacola ;)

 

Ee... pass on the old Pepsicola for me. I'd take the lot, Pepsicola included and the whole enchilada if we went back to the 2015-17 era.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,656 battles
4 hours ago, Barney_Wobba said:

Any takers?

Sure, although someone will have to teach me how to strafe - I never got the hang of that...

Wouldn't we lose a few decent ship lines (or rather need them reworking for the 'old' mechanics)? From memory, the last time we had a spike in requests for things to go back to the RTS era was when the CV Reework was being especially egregious, and the main down-side anyone could think of was that we'd lose - I think - the RN DDs...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts
1 hour ago, Verblonde said:

Sure, although someone will have to teach me how to strafe - I never got the hang of that...

Wouldn't we lose a few decent ship lines (or rather need them reworking for the 'old' mechanics)? From memory, the last time we had a spike in requests for things to go back to the RTS era was when the CV Reework was being especially egregious, and the main down-side anyone could think of was that we'd lose - I think - the RN DDs...

 

Back then we had things to look forward to, instead of things to look backward to for.

  • Cool 5
  • Funny 1
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,656 battles
2 hours ago, Karasu_Browarszky said:

 

Back then we had things to look forward to, instead of things to look backward to for.

Ouch! That's depressingly true...

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[G-O-M]
Players
2,597 posts
13,191 battles

 :Smile_teethhappy:I would play that kind of defined 'Historical Server' too :cap_like: :cap_yes:. I doubt  :etc_swear: WG will ever let this happen.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PEZ]
Players
11,301 posts
39,586 battles
16 hours ago, Barney_Wobba said:

I say 'Historical Server', but it's just another name for 'Classic Server'. A separate server for the older mechanics with RTS CV and no subs. Total fresh start server on all the main WoWs zones.

 

Any takers?

Not happening

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[K3RLS]
Players
509 posts
13,275 battles

Since the only reason they have for those bottomleeches is that they invested to much and are completely unwilling to admit when they failed, WG will not allow it. Besides, how are the speshull people supposted to have fun then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×