Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Wulf_Ace

That sweet spot in this game.

53 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[OZYR]
Players
3,800 posts
25,813 battles
1 hour ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

Anecdotal evidence isn't evidence.

Except we have some evidence that some meddling does occur and RNG is not necessarily as "blind as  you claim to be.

 

1 hour ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

Only - and really only - if you wish to be considered worthwhile anyone elses time. But don't fret, you already have a disciple, you can simply make a religion out of it and claim immunity from facts.

Not really.I'm not claiming that everybody's experience mirrors or should or could mirror mine.

 

Btw no human is "immune from facts", however what we will call "facts" needs to be established, also their relevancy. Also If I would have made the claim that my stats are the result of some form of meddling, ( as you baselessly, continuously and falsely  have claimed) then you would have had a case. 

 

So if somebody claims immunity from facts that would be....

giphy.gif.43b608bcf7d9085659fdea7e863e36

:)

1 hour ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

And after all this, the only question that remains is - do you manage to type this with a straight face?

 

Well we can almost anytime div up :)

 

1 hour ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

And what you do influences the teams success. If you only afk, you get low win rates, because your team can't compensate losing one player. Worse, if it's a deceisive class, like CV, not so bad it it's just a floating damage sponge - but even that has an influence, because any shell not shot at you gets shot at your team instead. So, who would have guessed, the teams results are based upon little and little influences the teams members.

 

Absolutely.

1 hour ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

 If you have two have teams which are equally skilled but for one bad player, that team is going to lose more often. Which in turn leads to below average win rates for that player. Everyone else gets switched around in random MM, staying average (or a little above, now that the bad player lowered the hurdle) untill, after an infninite amount of games, he arrives at 'his' win rate.

 

That's only theoretically. Btw this theory ( in the context of you continuously extrapolating towards me) has only one flaw. Me calling out bad decision on Wedgie's part regardless on how that would impact "my stats". :)

 

You can call me a bit of an expert on ops, and I  still will criticise how they returned them for a variety of reasons, none of them being "me" related.

 

1 hour ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

Winning a 1 on 1 doesn't qualify for anything. Getting deleted by a lucky torp means nothing. Neither does winning when playing overly agressive and getting lucky doing so.

 

 Yes and no. I didn't meant in 1v1 modes. Btw being lucky counts only if the torps weren't aimed :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts
1 hour ago, Andrewbassg said:

Also If I would have made the claim that my stats are the result of some form of meddling, ( as you baselessly, continuously and falsely  have claimed) then you would have had a case.  

giphy(4).gif.c4bea19c8c1086b4cabf1a230b320ed9.gif

 

On 3/10/2023 at 3:24 PM, Andrewbassg said:

Also, MM is (supposedly) a simple roll of the dice, but Wedgie, by reducing line ups, have effectively removed the possibility to truly influence the outcome, in terms of winning (I can elaborate further on this if necessary). 

On 3/12/2023 at 8:12 PM, Andrewbassg said:

Ever wondered why new ships ( or ships not played for a while) tend to perform "better"? That's because in the case of former the database doesn't exist, yet, and in the latter case the database has resetted itself.

22 hours ago, Andrewbassg said:

I can see several ways to do that, however given that it is( allegedly) decided by a third party.......I will refrain to do so.

On 3/12/2023 at 9:32 PM, Andrewbassg said:

But... since you mentioned, RNG not necessarily is, or has to be global. It could be... "personalised"

Seriosly, what kind of miniscule attention span does your social sciences majoring taxi driving yoga teacher have, that you think you can get away with this when talking to normal people?

 

1 hour ago, Andrewbassg said:

Well we can almost anytime div up :)

giphy(3).gif.f7e7769fb2050e21d76c039f51068a7a.gif

 

 

This has gone on far too long - the only one who gets a lobotomy here is me, and that alone by reading what you write - I'm already bleeding from the nose.

7ed2e4.gif.b586f82b453229558277d5741ade3419.gif

 

  • Funny 2
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OZYR]
Players
3,800 posts
25,813 battles
2 hours ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

giphy(4).gif.c4bea19c8c1086b4cabf1a230b320ed9.gif

Well....

 

elementary.gif.6bf69e1af361cf144c6c03147716e478.gif

 

:cap_haloween:

 

2 hours ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

Seriosly, what kind of miniscule attention span does your social sciences majoring taxi driving yoga teacher have, that you think you can get away with this when talking to normal people?

 

 

Oh......actually scratch that. Nothing you have quoted has any sort of relevancy. But.... let me guess, according to you the Earth is flat, right?

 

2 hours ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

  

giphy(3).gif.f7e7769fb2050e21d76c039f51068a7a.gif

 

:cap_haloween:TY. Exactly the answer I was hoping for. :cat_cool:  

2 hours ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

This has gone on far too long - the only one who gets a lobotomy here is me, and that alone by reading what you write - I'm already bleeding from the nose.

 

Well.... I'm not exactly putting a gun to your head to do so, so.......

 

2 hours ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

 

 7ed2e4.gif.b586f82b453229558277d5741ade3419.gif

 

Ummm......you don't seem to be.... resting? Looks like work with..... zero efficiency and horrible results.... You didn't even shut the zipper...:cap_haloween:

  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×