Update 12.1: British Submarines

[Ruth_clifton]

just payout 50k  fxp didnot get  duplicates W G

[tsounts]

50 minutes ago, jmk3r said:

We don't care what you want because we are rusky . Only give us your money and shut up.

Yep, Russia uber alles

[Ruth_clifton]

NO  money

[Todeskult]

11 hours ago, tsounts said:

I can't understand how critical having flags fluttering "incorrectly" is to actual gameplay for you to set as priority...

Man, there are priorities and soviet "priorities" 

 

3 hours ago, electro75 said:

and random is full of errors when playing submarines

You mean full of submarines? Yes, it is then 

 

[Juzeppe_111]

Soon there will be Chinese submarines, pan-American submarines, aircraft carrier submarines, submarines with 457 mm guns.... More submarines - the players dream about it... The world of submarines.

[SirBourne]

Please WG, for THIS TIME ONLY... Please... For the love of [edited]god!!! WE DO NOT WANT SUBMARINES IN OUR GAME!!!!!! How hard is it to understand??

If some1 have another opinion, please share so we can understand why this cancer exist? Or at least in this state. 

 

Every1 is just camping back and the game punishes you for trying to push forward. You can't really counter a sub in most of the ships, CV:s doesn't really get anything for trying to spot the sub for the rest of the team (I mean come on, you could've at least come up with a reward system for that) and if you're unlucky to only have the depths charges then you're literally (excuse my french) fked... 

 

All we want is our game back.. You've done a hell of a job, please let it not go to waste!

 

[luksusdyr]

On 2/13/2023 at 10:17 PM, Todeskult said:

YES!!! Because we need more of this speechless abomination!!!

 

DO YOU EVEN PLAY YOUR OWN GAME??? Have you tried recently playing at tiers 5 and 6 for instance? Because I did and majority of these battles are with 1 or 2 CVs AND with 2 or even 3 subs per team!

 

With very slow tier 5 or 6 battleship you can barely leave your spawn just to constantly being "pinged" and torped by these underwater monstrosities that have no place in this arcade-style game AND being harassed by CVs at the same time (not mentioning the DDs and their torps). Hydro doesn't detect them at proxy-spotting range, even DDs are having troubled avoiding their torps when trying to counter them. Battleships won't move forward because of those, cruisers cannot or won't support again because of those too, everybody is just staying at the back, those who tries to push gets "pinged" and obliterated.

 

HOW FUN IS THAT, tell me @The_EURL_Guy ???

 

What the heck, did you steal my notes.  Nice point you got there - thanks a lot  

[luksusdyr]

23 hours ago, UltraShirou said:

Carrier with new empty deck looks sadly. Empty decks, low polygons, optimized effects, dead game. 

Carriers with emty decks look very very very very nice - wish it was like that in the game. 30-50 planes and finish.....  

[ReDiR20]

9 hours ago, SirBourne said:

Please WG, for THIS TIME ONLY... Please... For the love of [edited]god!!! WE DO NOT WANT SUBMARINES IN OUR GAME!!!!!! How hard is it to understand??

If some1 have another opinion, please share so we can understand why this cancer exist? Or at least in this state. 

 

Every1 is just camping back and the game punishes you for trying to push forward. You can't really counter a sub in most of the ships, CV:s doesn't really get anything for trying to spot the sub for the rest of the team (I mean come on, you could've at least come up with a reward system for that) and if you're unlucky to only have the depths charges then you're literally (excuse my french) fked... 

 

All we want is our game back.. You've done a hell of a job, please let it not go to waste!

 

 

Subs are ok, you wanted to say that you lack skill to play against them?

[Juzeppe_111]

1 hour ago, ReDiR20 said:

Subs are ok, you wanted to say that you lack skill to play against them?

It's not about the ability to play against submarines. After their introduction, the game became extremely uncomfortable (for me personally). I believe that submarines were a big mistake of WG.

[URez_14]

Q: What smells like grabage, looks like garbage and most likely is a garbage?
A: 12.1
Empty CV decks, greediest BP season.

[TonyStarkshoudnthavedied]

What is the catch with the Brisbane? I just cannot imagine that for a web mission chain we get an almost OP T10 cruiser with a  19 point commander. This is so not WG. I guess we can only accumulate 90% of the tokens needed and rest we should get from 60 random bundles each cost 100 dubs or so. I just cannot believe that it can be that easy.

[Marblehead_1]

14 minutes ago, TonyStarkshoudnthavedied said:

What is the catch with the Brisbane? I just cannot imagine that for a web mission chain we get an almost OP T10 cruiser with a  19 point commander. This is so not WG. I guess we can only accumulate 90% of the tokens needed and rest we should get from 60 random bundles each cost 100 dubs or so. I just cannot believe that it can be that easy.

I bet it's something like with Velos, Black or Tromp EA event. You can get 100 tokens for free and spend like 300$ as addition for ship which you will be able to get for free in period of month. No possibility of getting ship in this "Early Access" for free. This mentioned 19 point commander will be I bet one of last stages, availaible only for $$$ as ship. Nothing interesting or suprising here considering this developer. I will be very ( and I mean really VERY ) suprised if it will be different. 

 

My 700k of Coal is waiting for Brisbane so it can wait month or two more or whatever more.

[AirSupremacy]

[Werfer_of_flammen]

The new aircraft carrier look is just pathetic. It looks so sad when giant aircraft carriers have like 9 planes on deck (United States starts with 6 which looks even worse). I don't get why would they change that, it looked fine before.

[kliffrick_2018]

Submarines Ruining my game.

[Djavdet_]

When will you rename the game to 'Elves of the World' or 'Gandalf Rules'?

[Djavdet_]

15.02.2023 o 09:16, ReDiR20 napisał:

 

Subs are ok, you wanted to say that you lack skill to play against them?

If I don’t steal by upbringing, then it burns that I don’t know how?

[JohnMac79]

On 2/15/2023 at 7:16 AM, ReDiR20 said:

 

Subs are ok, you wanted to say that you lack skill to play against them?

No, they are not ok. Claiming people dont have 'skill' to play against them is probably unwise...

[Hedgeh0g_in_the_fog]

Tell me,
can you make it so that you don’t get stuck when colliding with islands,
your nose rested and got stuck, you didn’t get tired before, now it’s appeared, or is it fun for you to create problems?

[S_h_i_v_a]

If subs look like sh1t, float like sh1t and smell like sh1t, then probably they are sh1t.

I dont like sh1t.

 

[tsounts]

56 minutes ago, S_h_i_v_a said:

If subs look like sh1t, float like sh1t and smell like sh1t, then probably they are sh1t.

I dont like sh1t.

 

Oh come on  my little fly! 

By the way, I despise them too! 

WG is refusing to fix the non stop aiming bugs and shells landing short off the target consecutively but new ships are being released at a pace we cannot even keep up with their gimmicks.

We're constantly bombarded by "news" that many times are of little importance or have to keep track of the never ending events and missions that are also ruining gameplay.

[JohnMac79]

2 hours ago, tsounts said:

WG is refusing to fix the non stop aiming bugs and shells landing short off the target consecutively...

 

WG refuse to acknowledge those bugs even exist at all.

 

No bugs here comrade, nothing to fix, its all in your imagination!

[tsounts]

13 hours ago, JohnMac79 said:

 

WG refuse to acknowledge those bugs even exist at all.

 

No bugs here comrade, nothing to fix, its all in your imagination!

Yep, had been contacting "customer support" and making complaints in the forum on Missouri's aiming for quite some time and the replies I kept getting was that everything was fine. A couple of years later they suddenly realized there was a problem with Missouri's accuracy and fixed it.....

[S_h_i_v_a]

22 ore fa, tsounts ha scritto:

We're constantly bombarded by "news" that many times are of little importance or have to keep track of the never ending events and missions that are also ruining gameplay.

Yes, i'm just waiting to see more about the new european DDs and the Spanish cruisers, i don't give a sh1t about US hybrids, UK subs,  new CVs, Pan American fantasy cruisers.

But i'm thinking to return to Homeworld 2.