Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
ImoutoSaikou

Who agrees to change the stars in RANK to the point system

7 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
40 posts
17,129 battles

To be honest, I'm a little tired of star saved after so many years.

 

Although I put forward this opinion at that time in the third season, my opinion was to give the top three star saved to the defeated,I don't know why it ended up being the first player.

 

In the previous few seasons, I often encountered the situation where I lost ten games in a row in one night but kept all stars.

 

 

But this makes me feel very nihilistic. Any effort is to stay in place, just wasting time in a meaningless way.

Even in the last season when the stars couldn't be saved, there would be many players with a weak fighting will. In fact, the teammates or opponents I met of them gave up fighting too early.

 

So I wonder why we can't change Rank into an integral system like Clan battle.

 

In my actual combat observation, the players with 1000 score or less on the winning side have low participation in the game,

I think this way of lying and winning should be punished.

 

If the defeated side scores more than 800 points, it means that he has tried to save the loss

 

And such efforts to fight to the end should be encouraged.

 

In this season, I met a player who has been playing IJN T9 Takahashi for 30 matches but only have 25 win rate,

The reason he gave is that the Rank match is just a matter of your MM luck. As for how I play it, it will not make any difference.

 

Although I don't want to agree with him, for me, every time I have a Rank match, I will take out the best ship and be equipped full signal flags。

But the result of the battle will not change much because I take it seriously.

 

So I hope that the Rank match can be changed to the point system, but it is not the same score given by everyone like Clan Battle.

 

The winning side will increase points according to the judgment method of  battle score >2000 >1500  >1000  and <1000,

 

The score change of the defeated side is based on the average of the war situation or top 3, 

Give them the preferential treatment of a small amount of points reduction or no points reduction or even points increase.

 

 

Although we all know that Warship World is a game about cooperation, you have to deny that in recent years, there have been a lot of old players lost, and more players have gone their own way.

It's time to make some changes according to the current situation. 

 

I think maybe you can keep the different tiers in the different legal, or the qualification star promotion or we can make some bigger changes 

Match bronze, silver and gold together and give different scores according to performance.

 

 

 

Please give your opinions.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POT80]
[POT80]
Players
1,261 posts
11,256 battles

But in CB you don't get any rewards for losing. Everyone on the winning team gets the same basic XP.  

 

Also basic XP don't offen reflect battle contributions. A DD made a game winning play at the start but died might have less XP than a HE spamming BB at the back of the map.

 

So a cut off based on basic xp would just make the ranked mode more toxic Also your system with points is more difficult for most players to understand. 

 

You can always do what I do, don't play Ranked if you don't like the mode. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles

Damage is, as always, rewarded too heavily in terms of XP in this game, and unless that changes, I'm not a fan of saving a star based on XP.

The system currently encourages damage farming if you're too bad to carry, and damage farming is not what should be rewarded.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
867 posts
14,307 battles

I think you thing about this way too much. 

 

Just enter ranked, shoot at the enemy, do your thing to win, hopefully enjoy it a bit and if you're excellent it'll all be fine

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
40 posts
17,129 battles
55 minutes ago, Hirohito said:

Damage is, as always, rewarded too heavily in terms of XP in this game, and unless that changes, I'm not a fan of saving a star based on XP.

The system currently encourages damage farming if you're too bad to carry, and damage farming is not what should be rewarded.

When you say that, I suspect you haven't played rank.

Have you really tried farm damage in 6v6 rank?

Maybe the game is over when you realize it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles
3 hours ago, ImoutoSaikou said:

When you say that, I suspect you haven't played rank.

 

Instead of suspecting things all the time, you could use a stats page to find out instead.
Would save you the time spent spelling out the question.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
340 posts
6,802 battles
On 2/2/2023 at 2:27 PM, ImoutoSaikou said:

When you say that, I suspect you haven't played rank.

Have you really tried farm damage in 6v6 rank?

Maybe the game is over when you realize it

Wow, what nonsense.

There are more than enough players trying to farm DMG in ranked instead of trying to win.

One could think you haven't play ranked...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×