Waterline: Winter 2023

[The_EURL_Guy]

First-hand intel about upcoming new game features!

Read it on the portal

[Swannen]

Spanish cruisers!!!!  Oh yeeeah ¡¡¡Cruceros españolessss!!! Siiiiiiii 

 

[Major_Boobage_]

Hybrid destroyer? 

[buccaneer_invader]

Have been to the seychels so do not upset the inhabitants by messing it up.

 

[flip_66]

Super-Petro and Super-Conq... Just what we need...

[Hakssor]

Quote

Repeated Battle Entry With the Same Ship

We're working on an improvement that will allow players to enter a new battle with a ship that was just destroyed without having to wait till the previous battle concludes. This way, you'll be able to fight more battles playing your favorite ship during a game session. This option should help speed up your game progress on your favorite ships.

The only good thing from this waterline. Hope it actually happens.

[Wicket_Boomber]

20 hours ago, The_EURL_Guy said:

First-hand intel about upcoming new game features!

Read it on the portal

For me most important from that should be new European destroyer line... but is not , I dont understand mindset of people who work in WG , I am Polish that live in Sweden and I dont want European line ! , I know that Sweds dont want Swedish line , and as WG is company that created product to earn money , why WG wont give players what they want ? , honeslty I am unhapy where game is going and as I am unhapy with that I wont spend cash on game , and I am not only one who think this way ...

 

Swedish line is no issue allready exist .

Polish line is easy too you allready have T10 model rename it with some more accurate like Huragan or Sztorm and whole line is easy

T1- Gryf

T2 -  whatever german Poland had several ex German ships that would fit that tier

T3 - same as above

T4 - Ouragan - Bourrasque class in game Poland used it in 1940

T5 - Wicher   -  Bourrasque class in game bought by Poland in 1930 and upgrated 

T6 - Garland  -  Gallant in game

T7 - Grom      -  Blyskawica , sister ship

T8 - Huragan - Blyskawica , sister ship , work started before war never completed , improved Grom class

T9 - Poland used several UK ships so Jutland model could be used , or ORP Grom 1957 Soviet Skory class , Poland owned 2 of those .

T10  - Poland operated 2 soviet dd class that would fit that tier Kotlin & Kashin class

... there is enought Destroyers in Polish history to make whole line , but I guess WG dont care about potential Polish customers ... that is just rusky mindset ...

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Cold_War_destroyers_of_Poland

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_War_II_destroyers_of_Poland

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Destroyers_of_the_Polish_Navy

 

[Wicket_Boomber]

Just now, Major_Boobage_ said:

Hybrid destroyer? 

I allready hate that idea , I have Tromp ... only for SG &SC , when I play destroyer I expect something else.

[Dark_Meta_]

I just love the name of the Super-Conquerer.

 

"Nomen est Omen" as they say, it basicly leaves a namecard on every ship it hits...

Spoiler

DEVASTATION

 

 

[Manowar_Menno]

There is no mention of the improved AA mechanic that was mentioned before, or am I just not seeing it. Since we're getting even more ships with planes (and even a DD hybrid) I was kind of hoping AA was going to actually do something against it.

 

Looking forward to the new cruiser lines though.

[Triplexmazi]

Hybrid destroyer please be a Turkish ship 

[doerhoff_damian]

Vor 1 Stunde, GordonsGekko sagte:

Super-Petro and Super-Conq... Just what we need...

Wait for Super-Vermont

[Siagor]

Repeated Battle Entry With the Same Ship
We're working on an improvement that will allow players to enter a new battle with a ship that was just destroyed without having to wait till the previous battle concludes. This way, you'll be able to fight more battles playing your favorite ship during a game session. This option should help speed up your game progress on your favorite ships.

 

a huge +1 on this 

[S_h_i_v_a]

24 minuti fa, doerhoff_damian ha scritto:

Wait for Super-Vermont

Vermont with quad turrets or with Montana speed?

[doerhoff_damian]

Vor 1 Minute, S_h_i_v_a sagte:

Vermont with quad turrets or with Montana speed?

my guess is it will be either 4 quad turrets or 5 triple turrets

 

It is also possible that it will only be a slightly improved Vermont (Armor, Secondaries, AA)

But the Speed will probably not improve

[Shepke]

So, another bunch of useless 3d-models and that is all...

This primitive gacha never ends.

 

[FooFaFie]

Just wondering where are the Russian submarines?  Didn't WG show us already the tech tree of those subs?

[ColonelPete]

• minefields are bad
• hybrid DD is bad, that is like bringing a passenger ship/rowboat line with a consumable that carpet bombs large parts of the map
• no suprise that the next RU Supership is a Petro-Clone
• airship escort should stay a separate game mode for specific times (for example: prime time every second weekend)

[Mr_Damager]

What's next? A hybrid submarine with an aircraft catapult?

[Obidav]

Comments under the video are hilarious.

[Duecut]

3 hours ago, Major_Boobage_ said:

Hybrid destroyer? 

Yeah just what the game needs!!

 

I can just image the chat..

TeamMate: DD how did you not see those Torpedo's? they were spotted for you 40 seconds ago!!

HybridDD: This ship is $#!&@#!! Why wasn't I invulnerable when flying my planes toward the CV for 10th time....

[doerhoff_damian]

Vor 45 Minuten, Mr_Damager sagte:

What's next? A hybrid submarine with an aircraft catapult?

you mean the japanese i-400

 

and if you prefer 8 inch guns. Then you might prefer the french Surcouf

[SanFelipeCartagena]

Spanish cruisers are wellcome

[Stronginthearms]

pah 8" small fry try HMS  M1

[Stronginthearms]

Just watched waterline YAWN they are still not fixing BROKEN MM