Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
VedranSeaWolf359

Do you use secondaries Build on British Battlecruisers?

37 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
6 hours ago, arczer25 said:

 


Tiger 152mm Actually have improved Accuracy and 5s reload with is much faster compared to higher tier ships
it has 2 Best Secondary effective DPM of All ships from the British BC line despite being Tier 5
its practically best pick for Secondary British battleship due to combination of guns, speed, secondary power (for it's tier) and torpedoes, armor is also pretty decent

tier 7 and up has 152mm but they have 12s reload... while 113mm have 5s, neither have improved accuracy ( Renown 1944 113mm have 3s reload with improved accuracy),

with 6.5 km secondary range at maximum.

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NECRO]
Players
6,381 posts
Vor 18 Minuten, ColonelPete sagte:

with 6.5 km secondary range at maximum.

And some 4.5 secs reload if properly skilled, I think, which is quite impressive if you consider the speed of the ship. 6.5 km on Tiger feel much more comfortable than 8.5 km (?) on Agincourt, because you can actively get into range instead of hoping that some dumba$$ voluntarily moves into your secondary range. As I mentioned, it felt decent when I tested it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
82 posts
1,454 battles

no, we do not play on them, like other new boats. since this is a boycott of all new content from lesta because they forcibly put super ships and submarines into random.
what I wish you!

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,963 posts
10,936 battles
4 hours ago, maybe__baby said:

no, we do not play on them, like other new boats. since this is a boycott of all new content from lesta because they forcibly put super ships and submarines into random.
what I wish you!

Speak for yourself. The UK BC line is some of the best content WG have added to the game in a long time, and they are a joy to play. Unless you do something dumb, like speccing them for secondaries.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,032 posts
19,168 battles
7 hours ago, maybe__baby said:

no, we do not play on them, like other new boats. since this is a boycott of all new content from lesta because they forcibly put super ships and submarines into random.
what I wish you!

Who is this "we" you are talking about anyway?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EUTF]
Players
628 posts
10,955 battles
4 minutes ago, Zuihou_Kai_Ni said:

Who is this "we" you are talking about anyway?

Probably the silent majority of players  :Smile_hiding:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,032 posts
19,168 battles
6 minutes ago, Nauseica said:

Probably the silent majority of players  :Smile_hiding:

you mean the same majority that supposedly hates subs?

image.thumb.png.a8a5390c44aad5e921c8a27e4b096d50.png

(I know your post was sarcasm i just wanted to enchance it)

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EUTF]
Players
628 posts
10,955 battles

Yep symmetrical balance matchmaking

23 BBabies and 23 subpotatoplayers :cap_haloween:

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PEZ]
Players
11,301 posts
39,586 battles
1 hour ago, Zuihou_Kai_Ni said:

you mean the same majority that supposedly hates subs?

image.thumb.png.a8a5390c44aad5e921c8a27e4b096d50.png

(I know your post was sarcasm i just wanted to enchance it)

You mean bunch of griefer potaotes heard about the new OP broken class and are now looking to expliot it by griefing the rest of the players?* Noo that would never happen in a WG title right? Right? :cap_haloween:

 

 

 

* And failing miserably for the most part as they are still useless tu*ds in whichever ship they turn in...

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×