[TACHA] VedranSeaWolf359 Players 714 posts 11,265 battles Report post #1 Posted January 31 Do you use secondaries Build on British Battlecruisers? it have kinda stronger secondaries... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #2 Posted January 31 No. I see no reason to. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PEZ] Yedwy Players 11,301 posts 39,586 battles Report post #3 Posted January 31 20 minutes ago, VedranSeaWolf359 said: Do you use secondaries Build on British Battlecruisers? it have kinda stronger secondaries... No? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SUOLA] arttuperkunas Players 1,963 posts 10,936 battles Report post #4 Posted January 31 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[R7S] lovelacebeer Players 4,158 posts 25,223 battles Report post #5 Posted January 31 Absolutely not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[RODS] Ronchabale Players 3,002 posts 10,002 battles Report post #6 Posted January 31 No armour so chewed to bits by just about everything Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LAFIE] lafeel Beta Tester 7,707 posts 7,856 battles Report post #7 Posted January 31 1 hour ago, VedranSeaWolf359 said: Do you use secondaries Build on British Battlecruisers? it have kinda stronger secondaries... No. Because simply put they aren't at the level of the German ones. That built in IFHE the German BB's (*both* lines btw) get makes their secondaries far better than the ones on the British BC's, which do not get it, neither for their primary guns nor their secondaries. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CV_SUB_Report_Blacklist Players 1,045 posts 21,881 battles Report post #8 Posted January 31 i know it is off topic , but talking about secondary's , look at this stupid over powered ship , 28 k secondary's shell . 27 k fires from secondary's ... about 55 k on angled incomparable in 1 minuet or 2 ... most my shells are ricochet , if not , non pen or over pen ... it is rare to pen this ship with 507 ... people says it is balanced ship ... whatever they say i hop WG test incomparable against Schlieffen and Ohio to see how stupid these 2 ships are over powered ... i mean , what is the point leaving bot doing most damage instead of you , boring ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Karkong_the_Impaler Players 2,983 posts Report post #9 Posted January 31 I tried it with Incomparable, to get that increased reload speed. It's absolutely not worth it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #10 Posted January 31 15 minutes ago, CVs_Report_Blacklist said: i know it is off topic , but talking about secondary's , look at this stupid over powered ship , 28 k secondary's shell . 27 k fires from secondary's ... about 55 k on angled incomparable in 1 minuet or 2 ... most my shells are ricochet , if not , non pen or over pen ... it is rare to pen this ship with 507 ... people says it is balanced ship ... whatever they say i hop WG test incomparable against Schlieffen and Ohio to see how stupid these 2 ships are over powered ... i mean , what is the point leaving bot doing most damage instead of you , boring ... If you are on an Incomparable, why is your ship that close to a Schlieffen? Incomparable has Cruiser armor... 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LAFIE] lafeel Beta Tester 7,707 posts 7,856 battles Report post #11 Posted January 31 34 minutes ago, ColonelPete said: Incomparable has Cruiser armor... In other words, those Schlieffen secondaries will eat her alive if you get in that close. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CV_SUB_Report_Blacklist Players 1,045 posts 21,881 battles Report post #12 Posted January 31 31 minutes ago, ColonelPete said: If you are on an Incomparable, why is your ship that close to a Schlieffen? Incomparable has Cruiser armor... no , i was in ranked defending the nearest cap to our base , and a dd was spotting me , Schlieffen secondary's shooting raining very long range ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #13 Posted January 31 2 minutes ago, CVs_Report_Blacklist said: no , i was in ranked defending the nearest cap to our base , and a dd was spotting me , Schlieffen secondary's shooting raining very long range ... Which is close. Incomparable is not made for this. The result is not surprising. The problem is not the ships, but how they are played. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NECRO] MementoMori_6030 [NECRO] Players 6,381 posts Report post #14 Posted January 31 I tried it with HMS Tiger during early access, and it was actually quite decent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CV_SUB_Report_Blacklist Players 1,045 posts 21,881 battles Report post #15 Posted January 31 10 minutes ago, ColonelPete said: Which is close. Incomparable is not made for this. The result is not surprising. The problem is not the ships, but how they are played. hahaha , i can say you didnt play incomparable right ? it has 6 shells , and even in close range the rng is bad , for long range it is worse , if i keep long range then i will hit nothing , instead i will get massive hits from other bbs ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #16 Posted January 31 1 minute ago, CVs_Report_Blacklist said: hahaha , i can say you didnt play incomparable right ? it has 6 shells , and even in close range the rng is bad , for long range it is worse , if i keep long range then i will hit nothing , instead i will get massive hits from other bbs ... Wrong. If you cannot handle her, take something else, but do not complain about the results when you move into an obvious bad situation. Btw Incomparable has a much better base dispersion than Ohio and even a slightly better one than Thunderer... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mad_Dog_Dante Players 6,636 posts Report post #17 Posted January 31 3 hours ago, VedranSeaWolf359 said: Do you use secondaries Build on British Battlecruisers? it have kinda stronger secondaries... No. Not even for memes. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CV_SUB_Report_Blacklist Players 1,045 posts 21,881 battles Report post #18 Posted January 31 1 minute ago, ColonelPete said: Wrong. If you cannot handle her, take something else, but do not complain about the results when you move into an obvious bad situation. Btw Incomparable has a much better base dispersion than Ohio and even a slightly better one than Thunderer... are you comparing dispersion with a different shells ? besides where i am supposed to go if the enemy came to our base ? and how can i know if there is a dd will spot me in the next minuet ? btw , can you say ( if you cant handle it ) thing to Schlieffen players ? i wonder ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LAFIE] lafeel Beta Tester 7,707 posts 7,856 battles Report post #19 Posted January 31 21 minutes ago, MementoMori_6030 said: I tried it with HMS Tiger during early access, and it was actually quite decent. That's in no small part due to the low HE pen being less of a issue at tier 5 than it is at tier 8 (or up) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #20 Posted January 31 3 minutes ago, CVs_Report_Blacklist said: are you comparing dispersion with a different shells ? besides where i am supposed to go if the enemy came to our base ? and how can i know if there is a dd will spot me in the next minuet ? btw , can you say ( if you cant handle it ) thing to Schlieffen players ? i wonder ... You were whining about the accuracy and I just told you that she is more accurate than some of the most accurate BB. It was your match, that is for you to decide. But if you stay in secondary range, you cannot complain about the results. If you cannot find a better solution, maybe Ranked is not the best enviroment for such a squishy BB. I have seen plenty of Schlieffen players who cannot handle Schlieffen and just thought pressing W multiple times is enough to win matches. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[THESO] KillStealBoss Players 12,123 posts 62,175 battles Report post #21 Posted January 31 They don't have the armour to use the secondaries. Also they have small caliber so it's even more pointless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KhorneFlake Beta Tester 340 posts 6,802 battles Report post #22 Posted January 31 3 hours ago, VedranSeaWolf359 said: Do you use secondaries Build on British Battlecruisers? it have kinda stronger secondaries... No they don't Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LAFIE] lafeel Beta Tester 7,707 posts 7,856 battles Report post #23 Posted January 31 20 minutes ago, KillStealBoss said: They don't have the armour to use the secondaries. Also they have small caliber so it's even more pointless. To be fair the higher tiers (7 and up) do have some 152's to go with the 113's they get from Renown on up.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPURD] Itwastuesday Players 1,768 posts 13,575 battles Report post #24 Posted January 31 No, they have good weapons already unlike the germans. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WAVY] arczer25 Players 177 posts 8,224 battles Report post #25 Posted January 31 1 hour ago, lafeel said: That's in no small part due to the low HE pen being less of a issue at tier 5 than it is at tier 8 (or up) 1 hour ago, lafeel said: To be fair the higher tiers (7 and up) do have some 152's to go with the 113's they get from Renown on up.. Tiger 152mm Actually have improved Accuracy and 5s reload with is much faster compared to higher tier ships it has 2 Best Secondary effective DPM of All ships from the British BC line despite being Tier 5 its practically best pick for Secondary British battleship due to combination of guns, speed, secondary power (for it's tier) and torpedoes, armor is also pretty decent tier 7 and up has 152mm but they have 12s reload... while 113mm have 5s, neither have improved accuracy ( Renown 1944 113mm have 3s reload with improved accuracy), 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
