[IRN] Krikkio82 Players 528 posts 13,882 battles Report post #1 Posted January 29 Jeez fu**ing man that is bad! MM after 1 sec to....this ??? PLS guys don't tell that is what u want... 20 4 2 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ILDET] Juuzaam Players 136 posts 8,856 battles Report post #2 Posted January 29 We have a winner for the weekly most scuffed matchmaking contest. And yes, this is what Wargaming wanted, otherwise they would have done something after literally everyone warned them about the possible outcome when introducing subs. 7 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HAKUY] Yosha_AtaIante Players 8,032 posts 19,168 battles Report post #3 Posted January 29 Isn't it suprising that there are actually players who play subs? Who would have seen that coming. 3 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NECRO] MementoMori_6030 [NECRO] Players 6,381 posts Report post #4 Posted January 29 Theory: The numbers of carrier and submarine players combined are proportional to the number of bad players. 12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POP] MixuS [POP] Beta Tester 637 posts 12,005 battles Report post #5 Posted January 29 Well at least you are in a DD, the natural enemy of submarines... 18 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[S-O-M] MadBadDave Players 1,355 posts Report post #6 Posted January 29 That’s exactly what WG wants; a fun, exciting and balanz game played by players of outstanding ability, and of course an excellent karma feedback system to match said play and MM. 1 15 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FJAKA] WingedHussar_Adler [FJAKA] Players 2,871 posts 16,098 battles Report post #7 Posted January 29 5 hours ago, Krikkio82 said: Jeez fu**ing man that is bad! MM after 1 sec to....this ??? PLS guys don't tell that is what u want... it looks great...where is the problem? 1 4 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[KKDR] webaake Players 302 posts Report post #8 Posted January 29 Didn't WG promise a cap on numbers of Subs and DD's in a game? I see WG as very reliable and good at keeping promises, so it's a mystery. (Not) 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FJAKA] WingedHussar_Adler [FJAKA] Players 2,871 posts 16,098 battles Report post #9 Posted January 29 18 minutes ago, webaake said: Didn't WG promise a cap on numbers of Subs and DD's in a game? I see WG as very reliable and good at keeping promises, so it's a mystery. nop they did not...they can not please all the cryers if you read forum you would see that vryers want limited numbers of: - dd -sub -cv -hybrids -bbs you know..EVERYTHING :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PEZ] Yedwy Players 11,301 posts 39,586 battles Report post #10 Posted January 29 7 hours ago, Krikkio82 said: Jeez fu**ing man that is bad! MM after 1 sec to....this ??? PLS guys don't tell that is what u want... Yep thats pretty much EXACTLY what they wanted 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,177 battles Report post #11 Posted January 29 7 hours ago, Krikkio82 said: Jeez fu**ing man that is bad! MM after 1 sec to....this ??? PLS guys don't tell that is what u want... It was the middle of the night. Some people waited much longer than you. You were just lucky. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[I-J-N] Karasu_Browarszky [I-J-N] Players 13,025 posts Report post #12 Posted January 29 1 minute ago, ColonelPete said: It was the middle of the night. Some people waited much longer than you. You were just lucky. If this counts as lucky in your book, I'd hate to see what it will look like when you get unlucky. 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Karkong_the_Impaler Players 2,983 posts Report post #13 Posted January 29 Well, at least it's less than 50% BBs, so, one can consider this to be an improvement.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FJAKA] WingedHussar_Adler [FJAKA] Players 2,871 posts 16,098 battles Report post #14 Posted January 29 3 minutes ago, Karasu_Browarszky said: If this counts as lucky in your book, I'd hate to see what it will look like when you get unlucky. look hom many subs pinate in game.....as DD they are food 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[I-J-N] Karasu_Browarszky [I-J-N] Players 13,025 posts Report post #15 Posted January 29 2 minutes ago, WingedHussar_Adler said: look hom many subs pinate in game.....as DD they are food DD's are the most useless class to counter the subs, closely followed by the non-airstrike cruisers. WG logic.... 11 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FJAKA] WingedHussar_Adler [FJAKA] Players 2,871 posts 16,098 battles Report post #16 Posted January 29 3 minutes ago, Karasu_Browarszky said: DD's are the most useless class to counter the subs, closely followed by the non-airstrike cruisers. WG logic.... only if you are bot 1 2 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[I-J-N] Karasu_Browarszky [I-J-N] Players 13,025 posts Report post #17 Posted January 29 1 minute ago, WingedHussar_Adler said: only if you are bot If you say so, human. 3 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FJAKA] WingedHussar_Adler [FJAKA] Players 2,871 posts 16,098 battles Report post #18 Posted January 29 Just now, Karasu_Browarszky said: If you say so, human. yep..puite LTP issue if you think you think sub can win over dds 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[I-J-N] Karasu_Browarszky [I-J-N] Players 13,025 posts Report post #19 Posted January 29 Just now, WingedHussar_Adler said: yep..puite LTP issue if you think you think sub can win over dds You misunderstood. The DD vs sub interaction is not the problem, it's how your DD stays spotted and becomes a practice target for half the red team. 10 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FJAKA] WingedHussar_Adler [FJAKA] Players 2,871 posts 16,098 battles Report post #20 Posted January 29 1 minute ago, Karasu_Browarszky said: You misunderstood. The DD vs sub interaction is not the problem, it's how your DD stays spotted and becomes a practice target for half the red team. why would you be spoted? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SFSO] Ymustihaveaname Players 362 posts 14,119 battles Report post #21 Posted January 29 I see 4 T8 BBs that could be swapped for nice new US hybrids to give more air spotting soon, so just think It's not as bad as it could be soon? 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[I-J-N] Karasu_Browarszky [I-J-N] Players 13,025 posts Report post #22 Posted January 29 1 minute ago, WingedHussar_Adler said: why would you be spoted? The sub would spot me before I get close enough, and there might also be an enemy DD close enough to the sub further back with better concealment than what I may have. Also, if their CV is working in tandem with the sub, they will send planes in my direction. There's plenty of opportunity of getting spotted unless the sub is dumb enough to move too close initially. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FJAKA] WingedHussar_Adler [FJAKA] Players 2,871 posts 16,098 battles Report post #23 Posted January 29 Just now, Karasu_Browarszky said: The sub would spot me before I get close enough, and there might also be an enemy DD close enough to the sub further back with better concealment than what I may have. Also, if their CV is working in tandem with the sub, they will send planes in my direction. There's plenty of opportunity of getting spotted unless the sub is dumb enough to move too close initially. Sub has couple 100 meters zone of undetected spot if she is on periscop depth so basicaly you know she is around 2,3 km from you and she is in more danger than you. If there are other ships around than offcourse you do not engage, as you would not normaly go 1 vs many. it is not dds problem. Most peoples cry about how sub "shotguned" them.....to do that sub must be close, on persicop depth and far from cover...so easy meal for dd 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[I-J-N] Karasu_Browarszky [I-J-N] Players 13,025 posts Report post #24 Posted January 29 Just now, WingedHussar_Adler said: Sub has couple 100 meters zone of undetected spot if she is on periscop depth so basicaly you know she is around 2,3 km from you and she is in more danger than you. If there are other ships around than offcourse you do not engage, as you would not normaly go 1 vs many. it is not dds problem. Most peoples cry about how sub "shotguned" them.....to do that sub must be close, on persicop depth and far from cover...so easy meal for dd You mean for DD guns? That leads to the DD getting spotted under almost all conditions. For the depth charges to work, the DD has to get on top of the sub or right next to. I have only played subs in those trial operations. You didn't need to be at periscope depth there to fire your torps at a DD. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FJAKA] WingedHussar_Adler [FJAKA] Players 2,871 posts 16,098 battles Report post #25 Posted January 29 Just now, Karasu_Browarszky said: You mean for DD guns? That leads to the DD getting spotted under almost all conditions. For the depth charges to work, the DD has to get on top of the sub or right next to. I have only played subs in those trial operations. You didn't need to be at periscope depth there to fire your torps at a DD. i mean for dd primary weapon against subs :)...and you do not need to get directly on top....you will hurt her/ leak oil form solid radious...as she is so slow underwater you got her in next 20 seconds 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
