Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
citaDELer

typical gold ranked quali

67 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[AGRES]
Players
253 posts
20,043 battles

for 1 place we have to got some points, and with then secure some star. - thats only fair rule. ONLY

 

this wargaming rules makes it all random.

 

guy in quali is better than that all gold shits..

retards in rank 2022-12-25 193825.png

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles
4 minutes ago, citaDELer said:

 

guy in quali is better than that all gold shits..

I doubt that, because your own stats are not exactly that great to play in gold to begin with, so if anything there should be an equal number of players who wouldnt want you on their team.

Maybe just stay and farm silver instead?

Because if you already struggle to qualify into gold, you know you're gonna have a rough time there.

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AGRES]
Players
253 posts
20,043 battles

:DDDDDD 

in gold 1 rank there is no reward. only moron will care about rank 1. 

 

all that matters... is grind, rab everthing and run away from ranked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,963 posts
10,936 battles
13 hours ago, Hirohito said:

I doubt that, because your own stats are not exactly that great to play in gold to begin with, so if anything there should be an equal number of players who wouldnt want you on their team.

Maybe just stay and farm silver instead?

Because if you already struggle to qualify into gold, you know you're gonna have a rough time there.

 

I am one star away from qualifying for gold, and haven’t touched ranked after that. Gold is incredibly toxic and the games aren’t much better. Still debating whether I want to qualify 

 

(also, sealclubbing t7 in atlanta is hilarious)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CR33D]
[CR33D]
Players
3,842 posts
38,979 battles

But people said that if WG remove saving star mechanic than everyone in the team will play for a win, right?

  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles
46 minutes ago, fumtu said:

But people said that if WG remove saving star mechanic than everyone in the team will play for a win, right?

Yeah they need to remove rewards from just winning games obviously, because it encourages potatoes to play at a level they are too sh*t to play, ruining the league system completely in the process.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles
13 hours ago, citaDELer said:

:DDDDDD 

in gold 1 rank there is no reward. only moron will care about rank 1. 

 

all that matters... is grind, rab everthing and run away from ranked.

Players like you are the reason ranked sucks so hard.

Go back to bronze/Silver where you belong.

 

Tired of carrying your a**es as you potato your way through the leagues.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts
15 hours ago, citaDELer said:

for 1 place we have to got some points, and with then secure some star. - thats only fair rule. ONLY

 

this wargaming rules makes it all random.

 

guy in quali is better than that all gold shits..

retards in rank 2022-12-25 193825.png

It's like homeopathy. Anecdotal evidence isn't evidence.

Basically you're too bad at tier 10 to play gold ranked. The ability required to play there is to repeatedly carry. Your tryhard div sealclubbing doesn't teach you the skills required to survive there.

 

Accept the fact that you don't belong there. I mean, the "shits" managed to get through the qualification and you don't - does that tell you nothing? And what insult do you have for that kind of player?

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AGRES]
Players
253 posts
20,043 battles

this post was not about individual.

first learn read,

then learn at least amateur lever of wows.

then come here.

 

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AGRES]
Players
253 posts
20,043 battles

i was testing few ships for 4 days.  

 

but the main thing, ---40 battles and in all  of them in first minutes died 2-3 my team mates. 

 

then i took petro and got wg luck, 5 batlles in a row a winn.  ( all i was 1-3 place)

 

now  the point again. doesnt matter how good you are, when are this wg random rules active, you cann do 100 battles and you will not get even golden quali.

or you cann be super loser, and you get quali in one hour. :DDD

 

  wg.. pls.. go and buy some brain, and do after years randed rules at least matemticaly logical, not  random-perfect.

 

for free how to do it:  for player in 1 place, give a token. after particular amount of tokens - you get a locked star. 

 

wow!!  THE problem solved,,,,good players are no more sacrifaced to random loser teams.

petro pro 2022-12-26 114040.png

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts
21 minutes ago, citaDELer said:

now  the point again. doesnt matter how good you are, when are this wg random rules active, you cann do 100 battles and you will not get even golden quali. 

or you cann be super loser, and you get quali in one hour. :DDD

Yes, even @Fastmotion managed to get carried into gold. Some people get lucky, some don't. But on average if you are skilled enough, you will make it.

 

This is the nature of WoWs matchmaking, you get an entirely random team, sometimes you can carry as hard as you like and still lose, some times you can afk and still win. The player skill only makes a difference in the games that could go either way.

 

You can believe that you're very good and deserve to be in gold and you didn't make because your team is "crap" all the time. But man - it's you who is not good enough for gold, not your team.

 

Concerning the brilliant idea with the tokens - who exactly wants the return of the long range damage farming hindenburg, being useless in the back row but first place in the end?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AGRES]
Players
253 posts
20,043 battles

here ar emilions of tones boring comment how one is bad,.,.oter is good, how this how that. 

 

ok. 

 

but obove that sholud me some WG wisdom, to setup rules that are logic and non random. 

 

its so shame that WG leaves you for bad players, and dont give you logical chance to forward when you good.

 

reward for first place is only solution. ist horrible that this easy task, cannt accomplish big wg team. its says.. more heads, more wisdom

in WG is like this: 

more heads ..for years no idea. and after huge community players rebelion, some progress.

 

shame..shame shame wg...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles
1 hour ago, citaDELer said:

now  the point again. doesnt matter how good you are, when are this wg random rules active, you cann do 100 battles and you will not get even golden quali.

or you cann be super loser, and you get quali in one hour. :DDD

Wrong.

Me for instance, I am good enough to grind through each league with everywhere from 60-70% wr in a typical session, because I'm good enough to overcome bad teammates (like you) and carry you sad sacks of potatoes to a win.

You on the other hand, are not capable of doing so, because you're the bad teammate.

 

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,963 posts
10,936 battles
6 minutes ago, Hirohito said:

Wrong.

Me for instance, I am good enough to grind through each league with everywhere from 60-70% wr in a typical session, because I'm good enough to overcome bad teammates (like you) and carry you sad sacks of potatoes to a win.

You on the other hand, are not capable of doing so, because you're the bad teammate.

I remember someone mentioning that bad players almost invariably believe they're average, or slightly above average players. I believe that's mostly true.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles
1 minute ago, arttuperkunas said:

I remember someone mentioning that bad players almost invariably believe they're average, or slightly above average players. I believe that's mostly true.

Dunning-Kruger bias I believe it's called?

Clear example of that with this guy here at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AGRES]
Players
253 posts
20,043 battles

this is not about players. this is about matematical fault in wg rules

 

there is therretical stat chance..that best player will do 100 battles in quali, and will not succeed. 

 

and that big shame fault in wg rules

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,963 posts
10,936 battles
1 minute ago, Hirohito said:

Dunning-Kruger bias I believe it's called?

Clear example of that with this guy here at least.

If you want to derive it from that, sure.

 

On a general level, it IMO derives from the problem of expertise. The first threshold in becoming skilled in a subject matter is to be able to more or less objectively assess your own skill level in comparison to other practicioners. If you lack even that, then... yeah. That's what you get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles
9 minutes ago, citaDELer said:

there is therretical stat chance..that best player will do 100 battles in quali, and will not succeed

Oh please, you're gonna claim that you got bad luck 100 games in a row?

 

Now to put into perspective how absolutely absurd those odds are:

If you flipped a coin and got tails 100 in a row, the odds of that would be 1 to a number containing 29 zeroes.

Now that not directly comparable to a ranked qualifier, but if you still failed to go 6 games net positive in the qualifier, the odds of that are just ridiculously low if you assume "the best player".

 

Just stop and dont make a further fool out of yourself, and gtfo back to bronze.

 

Edit: Usually I dont mind bad teammates like yourself, but when you come here and act like you're hot sh*t while talking smack, you deserve to hear it.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
340 posts
6,802 battles
1 hour ago, citaDELer said:

this post was not about individual.

first learn read,

then learn at least amateur lever of wows.

then come here.

 

 

46% ranked win rate of yours is quite impressive...

Guess we all know who 's the amateur here

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AGRES]
Players
253 posts
20,043 battles
Před 20 minutami Hirohito řekl/a:

Wrong.

Me for instance, I am good enough to grind through each league with everywhere from 60-70% wr in a typical session, because I'm good enough to overcome bad teammates (like you) and carry you sad sacks of potatoes to a win.

You on the other hand, are not capable of doing so, because you're the bad teammate.

 

you are weak like anything and you do crap.

 

mean while this  are so stupid word, like your cotributuon in battles:DD

 

in one side is honoring team (work) , and with same sentence  he proclaims that no team needet because he kills all alone :DDDD

 

woundnt you like to join wg brain team?..you are best adept :DDD

 

image.png.211e5cd613b183a361dd4f2088b6f221.png

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AGRES]
Players
253 posts
20,043 battles
Před 1 minutou KhorneFlake řekl/a:

46% ranked win rate of yours is quite impressive...

Guess we all know who 's the amateur here

another no brain. 

winrate is math number about team. so, its for clan battles.

 

when you are worst in math,, dont write here this supercraps.

 

when i am in 1 place in 10 deafeat battles, i am ZERO winrate like top player. you got now you brainiac?? :DDD

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles
6 minutes ago, citaDELer said:

 

you are weak like anything and you do crap.

 

mean while this  are so stupid word, like your cotributuon in battles:DD

 

in one side is honoring team (work) , and with same sentence  he proclaims that no team needet because he kills all alone :DDDD

 

woundnt you like to join wg brain team?..you are best adept :DDD

 

I'm getting brain cancer just trying to read and comprehend your texts at this point.

 

You're either the most delusional guy in a long time here, or an excellent troll.

Unfortunately for you, I think it's the former.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AGRES]
Players
253 posts
20,043 battles
Před 1 minutou Hirohito řekl/a:

I'm getting brain cancer just trying to read your texts at this point.

your brain cancer is obvious. that explains all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles
1 minute ago, citaDELer said:

your brain cancer is obvious. that explains all

Might be, but even so, you're still bad and will continue to struggle in Gold because you just aren't good enough at the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×