silver ranked easy..take this! :

[arttuperkunas]

13 minutes ago, CSS_modding_1 said:

 

 

Brah you have a 39% winrate in ranked. I didn't even know that was possible without intentionally trolling/throwing matches.

 

"bad" does not begin to describe it. If you insist on believing you lose matches because of your team, you will also never improve, and keep being a drag on your team.

[Hirohito]

Funny how poor spelling seems to go hand in hand with poor performance as well.

Just an observation.

[CSS_modding_1]

48 minutes ago, arttuperkunas said:

Brah you have a 39% winrate in ranked. I didn't even know that was possible without intentionally trolling/throwing matches.

 

"bad" does not begin to describe it. If you insist on believing you lose matches because of your team, you will also never improve, and keep being a drag on your team.

yup and ur the best player 

gold rank 1 and showing full broadside so i kan hit 9 citadels 

then u are a good player 

and u can reach rank 1 in gold 

[CSS_modding_1]

35 minutes ago, Hirohito said:

Funny how poor spelling seems to go hand in hand with poor performance as well.

Just an observation.

dan moet je nederlands leren 

im duch  

 

[Hirohito]

Just now, CSS_modding_1 said:

dan moet je nederlands leren 

im duch  

 

And I'm a German.

Your point being?

[CSS_modding_1]

Just now, Hirohito said:

And I'm a German.

Your point being?

ich bin nicht so gut im englisch schreiben 

das meine ich 

aber kansst du niederlandies schreiben 

oder sprechen 

manche leute sind nicht so gut wie sie 

 

[arttuperkunas]

25 minutes ago, CSS_modding_1 said:

yup and ur the best player 

gold rank 1 and showing full broadside so i kan hit 9 citadels 

then u are a good player 

and u can reach rank 1 in gold 

No, I’m an ok player - still struggle to carry games particularly in gold though. I sometimes really blow games by taking bad risks or playing too passively.

 

What I don’t do is blame the team for my own shortcomings.

[Karkong_the_Impaler]

3 hours ago, CSS_modding_1 said:

just had a fight in brawls 

look at wat is not right in the pics 

oponent rank 1 gold and 9 citadels on his ship still not gone but he was burning 

but his ship survived 9 citadel hits 

and this one was running like in random battles 

yea right 

no one can fight cheaters  and

u say im a bad player 

https://shiptool.st/selected?s=JC012RC209&c=top&p=ap&rm=12

 

Riga has 50 500 hp. Ibuki shells deal 4700 damage for a citadel (and has a heal). Either your math skills are as advanced as your WoWs skills or you have no clue. Yes, it's the latter, you didn't even know how this works.

I personally take great pride in being called a cheater, because that means I've handed someone his behind in a very spectacular way - others might be offended, so it's frowned upon by the mods, especially as you display his name here.

The only thing that's surprising is that he showed that much broadside for you to citadel him, I guess he expected you to be as bad as potato alert told him and assumed you don't even know what AP is. Good for you, being underestimated is helpful.

 

But concerning the most important issue here, the first step to improvement:

3 hours ago, CSS_modding_1 said:

u say im a bad player  

 

https://wows-numbers.com/player/590162465,CSS_modding_1/

 

You are bad. Really, really bad, much worse than what WG consierst to be "plain bad", see above.

Please watch the videos provided by WG to understand about the basics and then proceed to the more advanced tutorials. I personally can't stop recommending yuro - even for the ships you don't play yourself, because you understand how the work. Some of his guides are outdated though.

 

https://www.youtube.com/@Yurobeat

 

Now please, stop making a fool of yourself and git gud. It' not the others cheating, it's not your team failing, it's YOU.

 

 

 

 

[Nibenay78]

On 12/23/2022 at 11:31 PM, CSS_modding_1 said:

i had made it to rank one  but in kwalifications suddenly it was over with the fun 

teams play like their in random and dont want to win 

also many afk more 

and dont look at winrates in stats wen u have bad teams u loose 

bb,s cruising  on borders of map 

and battles with 4 bb 2 cruisers and 1 dd are the most comon 

were is the logick in this 

on the real battlefields there war more cruisers and dd then bb 

they are  protectors of the battle ships  and not the other way around 

so if wargaming wants to be realistic change the machmaking 

and truly look at the history

 

And this time, lets try in standard oxford english. Thank you very much in advance...

[CSS_modding_1]

37 minutes ago, Nibenay78 said:

And this time, lets try in standard oxford english. Thank you very much in advance...

im duch so not verry good in english writing

 

[CSS_modding_1]

1 hour ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

https://shiptool.st/selected?s=JC012RC209&c=top&p=ap&rm=12

 

Riga has 50 500 hp. Ibuki shells deal 4700 damage for a citadel (and has a heal). Either your math skills are as advanced as your WoWs skills or you have no clue. Yes, it's the latter, you didn't even know how this works.

I personally take great pride in being called a cheater, because that means I've handed someone his behind in a very spectacular way - others might be offended, so it's frowned upon by the mods, especially as you display his name here.

The only thing that's surprising is that he showed that much broadside for you to citadel him, I guess he expected you to be as bad as potato alert told him and assumed you don't even know what AP is. Good for you, being underestimated is helpful.

 

But concerning the most important issue here, the first step to improvement:

 

https://wows-numbers.com/player/590162465,CSS_modding_1/

 

You are bad. Really, really bad, much worse than what WG consierst to be "plain bad", see above.

Please watch the videos provided by WG to understand about the basics and then proceed to the more advanced tutorials. I personally can't stop recommending yuro - even for the ships you don't play yourself, because you understand how the work. Some of his guides are outdated though.

 

https://www.youtube.com/@Yurobeat

 

Now please, stop making a fool of yourself and git gud. It' not the others cheating, it's not your team failing, it's YOU.

 

 

 

 

yea right 

 

 

 

 

[CSS_modding_1]

1 hour ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

https://shiptool.st/selected?s=JC012RC209&c=top&p=ap&rm=12

 

Riga has 50 500 hp. Ibuki shells deal 4700 damage for a citadel (and has a heal). Either your math skills are as advanced as your WoWs skills or you have no clue. Yes, it's the latter, you didn't even know how this works.

I personally take great pride in being called a cheater, because that means I've handed someone his behind in a very spectacular way - others might be offended, so it's frowned upon by the mods, especially as you display his name here.

The only thing that's surprising is that he showed that much broadside for you to citadel him, I guess he expected you to be as bad as potato alert told him and assumed you don't even know what AP is. Good for you, being underestimated is helpful.

 

But concerning the most important issue here, the first step to improvement:

 

https://wows-numbers.com/player/590162465,CSS_modding_1/

 

You are bad. Really, really bad, much worse than what WG consierst to be "plain bad", see above.

Please watch the videos provided by WG to understand about the basics and then proceed to the more advanced tutorials. I personally can't stop recommending yuro - even for the ships you don't play yourself, because you understand how the work. Some of his guides are outdated though.

 

https://www.youtube.com/@Yurobeat

 

Now please, stop making a fool of yourself and git gud. It' not the others cheating, it's not your team failing, it's YOU.

 

 

 

 

yup and u started this game as a ace 

[LukkaiCH]

Vor 4 Stunden, CSS_modding_1 sagte:

but his ship survived 9 citadel hits

Ibuki guns upon hitting the citadel: 4'700 damage per hit. Times nine, that is a total of 42'300 damage.

A fire burning full duration without being extinguished on a cruiser like Riga will take 9% of its maximum health pool in damage. That is anywhere between 4'257 and 4'909.5 damage, depending on upgrades and captain skills.

 

Riga base hp without any kind of upgrades or captain skills: 47'300.

Hull B will increase that to 50'500 health points.

Survivability Expert will add 4'050 health points on top. It's very likely that he has it.

Fire damage can be healed back completely, Riga does have a repair team to do so.

 

Seriously, what are you trying to say here? It's absolutely obvious that his ship would survive 9 citadels and a fire. Easily so should he use damage control and/or his repair team. Where is the cheating supposed to happen?

[Karkong_the_Impaler]

Just now, CSS_modding_1 said:

yea right 

Does that mean you understand this now? I really don't know how to explain this any better. Would it help if I type slower?

 

16 minutes ago, CSS_modding_1 said:

yup and u started this game as a ace 

I never claimed that. But then I didn't come here to about my team and/or cheaters when the only consistent thing to blame was myself.

[triumphgt6]

To be fair, he only started playing in July and his stats show a gradual increase. However much of the problem is down to the rapid transition through the tiers. When I started, I had seen a Jingles video about the Cleveland - Tier 6 back then and I shot up the tiers far too quickly. Got the Cleveland and sucked big time - an experienced player gave me some friendly and not patronising advice so I went back to Tier 3 and learned how to angle, how to shoot and when to advance and when to run away. I am not a good player and I know my limits. Tier X is not really for me as I get bored far too easily. So Tier 7 and 8 is where I play. I found some ships I really like and am OK at and play them. I suggest that CSS try the same - get a ship you like at a lower tier and play it till you W/R is well over 50% - I am afraid WG have made low tiers far less fun than they used to be as now mainly bots so suggest T5 is not a bad starting place. T6 if playing cruisers especially if paying RN CLs!  And division up - it helps if you know what at least one person is doing and they can talk you out of daft moves! 

[Karkong_the_Impaler]

1 hour ago, triumphgt6 said:

However much of the problem is down to the rapid transition through the tiers.

WRONG!

 

It's his  team! And cheaters! Or maybe both?

Also he once won against a good player, so it's literally impossible he's bad! (Also his math skills are apparently impeccable, as are his WoWs skills)

 

In all seriousness, unless he stops blaming external factors and realizes the issue is himself, he won't change and can't git gud. That's why I'm trying to drive that point home, I don't want to ridicule him but I want him to do the first baby steps in the right direction.

 

Also, the low tiers teach you nothing about the game once you learned the basics and dealing with/and or using the new gimmick that come with the higer tiers. You realize that when the sealclubbers find themselves matched with tier 10 players in a forced low tier ranked or, gods beware, the sealclubbers try to play tier 10 themselves and all three of them eat torps in the same smoke.

[CSS_modding_1]

20 hours ago, triumphgt6 said:

To be fair, he only started playing in July and his stats show a gradual increase. However much of the problem is down to the rapid transition through the tiers. When I started, I had seen a Jingles video about the Cleveland - Tier 6 back then and I shot up the tiers far too quickly. Got the Cleveland and sucked big time - an experienced player gave me some friendly and not patronising advice so I went back to Tier 3 and learned how to angle, how to shoot and when to advance and when to run away. I am not a good player and I know my limits. Tier X is not really for me as I get bored far too easily. So Tier 7 and 8 is where I play. I found some ships I really like and am OK at and play them. I suggest that CSS try the same - get a ship you like at a lower tier and play it till you W/R is well over 50% - I am afraid WG have made low tiers far less fun than they used to be as now mainly bots so suggest T5 is not a bad starting place. T6 if playing cruisers especially if paying RN CLs!  And division up - it helps if you know what at least one person is doing and they can talk you out of daft moves! 

thank u for understanding me 

and give me tips 

most of the people start to look at winrate but forget thy made the same mistakes to

and once started this game  as a noob 

and thy play t10 ships aganst a noob like me in a t8

but thank u for the tip i go and try to work with it 

 

[CSS_modding_1]

19 hours ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

WRONG!

 

It's his  team! And cheaters! Or maybe both?

Also he once won against a good player, so it's literally impossible he's bad! (Also his math skills are apparently impeccable, as are his WoWs skills)

 

In all seriousness, unless he stops blaming external factors and realizes the issue is himself, he won't change and can't git gud. That's why I'm trying to drive that point home, I don't want to ridicule him but I want him to do the first baby steps in the right direction.

 

Also, the low tiers teach you nothing about the game once you learned the basics and dealing with/and or using the new gimmick that come with the higer tiers. You realize that when the sealclubbers find themselves matched with tier 10 players in a forced low tier ranked or, gods beware, the sealclubbers try to play tier 10 themselves and all three of them eat torps in the same smoke.

u are cod an started the game as an ace 

im in t8 against t9 and 10 

and i have to make the fight  

sure i do it wrong and the rest not 

i am the bad player and all of u are good 

from start on 

u now wat my problem is it supposed to be a team game 

but its not teams who play against eachother  but induviduals 

 

 

[JohnMac79]

Lost one game in Bronze, players in Silver are just worse though so i gave up.

[triumphgt6]

23 hours ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

WRONG!

 

It's his  team! And cheaters! Or maybe both?

Also he once won against a good player, so it's literally impossible he's bad! (Also his math skills are apparently impeccable, as are his WoWs skills)

 

In all seriousness, unless he stops blaming external factors and realizes the issue is himself, he won't change and can't git gud. That's why I'm trying to drive that point home, I don't want to ridicule him but I want him to do the first baby steps in the right direction.

 

Also, the low tiers teach you nothing about the game once you learned the basics and dealing with/and or using the new gimmick that come with the higer tiers. You realize that when the sealclubbers find themselves matched with tier 10 players in a forced low tier ranked or, gods beware, the sealclubbers try to play tier 10 themselves and all three of them eat torps in the same smoke.

I would suggest that a good start is learning the basics and you can learn this in lower tiers though higher now than when I started. I normally suggest getting a 50%+ W/R in one tier before moving to the next and rinse and repeat. I also tend to find that friendly encouragement works the best - I dare say all of us at times blame bad luck or lack of support for a loss when impetuosity was the real cause but that surely is part of learning. I still have the odd game when deleted very early due to suddenly finding myself in a silly position usually when pretending to be a destroyer when in the Fiji as either no destroyers or none nearby! My fault but done with the best of intentions!

[Karkong_the_Impaler]

4 minutes ago, triumphgt6 said:

I would suggest that a good start is learning the basics and you can learn this in lower tiers though higher now than when I started. I normally suggest getting a 50%+ W/R in one tier before moving to the next and rinse and repeat.

I've already written why I don't think it is helpful, but I gladly agree to disagree here.

 

4 hours ago, CSS_modding_1 said:

most of the people start to look at winrate but forget thy made the same mistakes to

and once started this game  as a noob 

This sounds a lot different compared to your complaining about your team and your lame excuses concerning "cheaters". I certainly didn't start out the game with a high win rate.

 

4 hours ago, CSS_modding_1 said:

but thank u for the tip i go and try to work with it 

If you can't follow the amount of information I've thrown in your general direction, then you're beyond me to help you - a modicum of self enablement is a basic requirement to exist in the world we're living in. No one is going to spoon feed you for the rest of your life. Just learn and git gud.

[CSS_modding_1]

7 hours ago, TonyStarkshoudnthavedied said:

If the Ägir player does not make a mistake in the one maneuver he has to do, it will win. If there are two Ägirs (70% of the battles), then the one who executes better that one single move will win. It is utterly boring. I really like 1v1, 2v2, 3v3. But here there is no challenge, there is no variation, there is just one sure way to win. And as it is tedious grind with 6 battles per mission to win, you don't try anything else. It is so boring I will not even grind it. I just use it to make the daily missions complete fast.

 

3 minutes ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

I've already written why I don't think it is helpful, but I gladly agree to disagree here.

 

This sounds a lot different compared to your complaining about your team and your lame excuses concerning "cheaters". I certainly didn't start out the game with a high win rate.

 

If you can't follow the amount of information I've thrown in your general direction, then you're beyond me to help you - a modicum of self enablement is a basic requirement to exist in the world we're living in. No one is going to spoon feed you for the rest of your life. Just learn and git gud.

 

22 minutes ago, triumphgt6 said:

I would suggest that a good start is learning the basics and you can learn this in lower tiers though higher now than when I started. I normally suggest getting a 50%+ W/R in one tier before moving to the next and rinse and repeat. I also tend to find that friendly encouragement works the best - I dare say all of us at times blame bad luck or lack of support for a loss when impetuosity was the real cause but that surely is part of learning. I still have the odd game when deleted very early due to suddenly finding myself in a silly position usually when pretending to be a destroyer when in the Fiji as either no destroyers or none nearby! My fault but done with the best of intentions!

first comment i can work with thank u 

i tryed an already won fights 

and killed 4 in one battle 

so thanks for the support 

 

 

[CSS_modding_1]

On 12/27/2022 at 7:09 PM, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

WRONG!

 

It's his  team! And cheaters! Or maybe both?

Also he once won against a good player, so it's literally impossible he's bad! (Also his math skills are apparently impeccable, as are his WoWs skills)

 

In all seriousness, unless he stops blaming external factors and realizes the issue is himself, he won't change and can't git gud. That's why I'm trying to drive that point home, I don't want to ridicule him but I want him to do the first baby steps in the right direction.

 

Also, the low tiers teach you nothing about the game once you learned the basics and dealing with/and or using the new gimmick that come with the higer tiers. You realize that when the sealclubbers find themselves matched with tier 10 players in a forced low tier ranked or, gods beware, the sealclubbers try to play tier 10 themselves and all three of them eat torps in the same smoke.

so u say im bad wat is this then  its brawls t 10 

 

 

 

[Hirohito]

57 minutes ago, CSS_modding_1 said:

so u say im bad wat is this then  its brawls t 10 

 

 

 

Cool screenshots, anecdotal evidence is anecdotal though.
Though to be fair, it's also WG saying that you are bad.
Nothing wrong with that, but let's not pretend otherwise.

[Karkong_the_Impaler]

1 hour ago, CSS_modding_1 said:

so u say im bad wat is this then  its brawls t 10

I don't know how to explain this to you as you seem to be inable to grasp simple correlations. A 40% win rate means that you still win 40% of the time, even though you try your best to lose the game for your team.

Four won games are not impressive if you then lose six more. That just means you are a bad player.