[RONIN] 22cm Beta Tester 6,377 posts 36,662 battles Report post #26 Posted December 19, 2022 Current Ranked is just Random with less players. It is not skill rewarding. It should have been changed long ago. If the team has 6 players, then the first 4 from the winning team and the first 2 from the losing team should get a star, to reward the player performance and not to allow potatoes to be carried. This would also solve the AFK problem. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] Seraphice WG Staff 1,664 posts 7,812 battles Report post #27 Posted December 19, 2022 5 minutes ago, 22cm said: Current Ranked is just Random with less players. It is not skill rewarding. It should have been changed long ago. If the team has 6 players, then the first 4 from the winning team and the first 2 from the losing team should get a star, to reward the player performance and not to allow potatoes to be carried. This would also solve the AFK problem. This in itself is already more skill rewarding. The less players in a match, the more individual skill will matter, because 1 player will have more influence on the battle. Happy holidays Captain! ~Sera 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[RONIN] 22cm Beta Tester 6,377 posts 36,662 battles Report post #28 Posted December 19, 2022 No. Using this logic then 1 vs.1 would be the most skill rewarding, and in reality is the most ship dependent from all. WoT tried to fix this system long ago - chevrons. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[UWUWU] Kiagy Players 409 posts 9,933 battles Report post #29 Posted December 19, 2022 1 hour ago, Seraphice said: . The less players in a match, the more individual skill will matter, because 1 player will have more influence on the battle. Happy holidays Captain! ~Sera Exactly, this is why an afk is a huge loss to a team in Ranked Battles 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] Seraphice WG Staff 1,664 posts 7,812 battles Report post #30 Posted December 19, 2022 2 hours ago, 22cm said: No. Using this logic then 1 vs.1 would be the most skill rewarding, and in reality is the most ship dependent from all. WoT tried to fix this system long ago - chevrons. Is it not? You have 100% of the influence on your team's performance Happy holidays Captain! ~Sera 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PEZ] Yedwy Players 11,301 posts 39,586 battles Report post #31 Posted December 19, 2022 11 minutes ago, Seraphice said: Is it not? You have 100% of the influence on your team's performance Happy holidays Captain! ~Sera With a random opponent in a rock/paper/scissors concept (we wont even go into lizard/spock extension) really? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[L-DI] coolrunings_99 Players 129 posts 14,939 battles Report post #32 Posted December 19, 2022 yes, yes it is imperative this gets sorted asap, so that all online pvp games make everyone happy summer children, salt and toxicity are banished (canceled hehe, pun intended)..after we get that, next task is peace on Earth and love everlasting🤟😉 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WP70] ________________Morrison Players 892 posts 22,465 battles Report post #33 Posted December 19, 2022 On 12/18/2022 at 1:25 PM, Kiagy said: The rules need changing regarding AFK players in ranked Battles, at present they only go pink which is ridiculous. Yes i know that sometimes things happen: phone rings, someone knocks door etc, i get that and it happens, but the rules still need changing. I would propose the following rules for AFK players... 1- Just a warning for 1st afk in ranked sprint 2- A 2nd afk by the same player in the current ranked sprint should incur a 4 hour ban from the current sprint 3- A 3rd afk by the same player in the current ranked sprint should incur a 12 hour ban 4- A 4th afk by the same player should be a perma ban until the current sprint has ended Thoughts ? Very much against this. I get you're all EpIC gAmErS But chaos minds and people with a family have higher priorities than stroking your E peen. Somtimes it takes a hot 3 minutes before I get a match so I go do more usefull things. and with the new very much NOT optimized afk detector this would ban me and other individuals for joining the battle 2 minutes late. People with a family can have family matters mid match that need to be taken care of. If theres a fire somewhere in the house or any other calamity because of dumbass neighbours. Last thing you should think of is: damn. I can't leave my team alone in a vidgy game. Remember this is just a game. You're not gonna die in real life if you die in the game. Unless your life is really well.. lets be nice.. Uninteresting... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Karkong_the_Impaler Players 2,983 posts Report post #34 Posted December 19, 2022 2 hours ago, Seraphice said: Is it not? You have 100% of the influence on your team's performance I mean.. you even quoted him, how did you miss this? 4 hours ago, 22cm said: the most ship dependent Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[UWUWU] Kiagy Players 409 posts 9,933 battles Report post #35 Posted December 19, 2022 14 minutes ago, Milfious said: Very much against this. I get you're all EpIC gAmErS But chaos minds and people with a family have higher priorities than stroking your E peen. Somtimes it takes a hot 3 minutes before I get a match so I go do more usefull things. and with the new very much NOT optimized afk detector this would ban me and other individuals for joining the battle 2 minutes late. People with a family can have family matters mid match that need to be taken care of. If theres a fire somewhere in the house or any other calamity because of dumbass neighbours. Last thing you should think of is: damn. I can't leave my team alone in a vidgy game. Remember this is just a game. You're not gonna die in real life if you die in the game. Unless your life is really well.. lets be nice.. Uninteresting... Take the above comment as an example, such a player would have to enter a huge amount of Ranked Battles being afk to achieve the players aim, this is wrong as the impact on teams he enters afk is huge As i said earlier; i get that some players have disconnection problems or in game freezes or any other problems that causes them to be afk (i have had my share of them), but after 4 or 5 times being afk because of such problems they should not be entering ranked battles as they already know the liklehood of disconnection is high (at least until the problem is resolved), now my point is not to ban everyone that disconnects from the game if they rejoin even after 5 minutes they should not be treated as an afk (its not the same}, but players consistently being afk should face a harsher ban.at least until the end of the current Ranked Sprint Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WP70] ________________Morrison Players 892 posts 22,465 battles Report post #36 Posted December 19, 2022 5 minutes ago, Kiagy said: Your point? this is the most annoying way to quote a quote? Top or bottom response? Which one aplies Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[UWUWU] Kiagy Players 409 posts 9,933 battles Report post #37 Posted December 19, 2022 12 minutes ago, Milfious said: Your point? this is the most annoying way to quote a quote? Top or bottom response? Which one aplies If you had read the quote you would not need to ask that question Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WP70] ________________Morrison Players 892 posts 22,465 battles Report post #38 Posted December 19, 2022 2 minutes ago, Kiagy said: If you had read the quote you would not need to ask that question I did. And I still dont know. The third line of the Smash mouth All Star song would give you an accurate description of me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PTS] _Keiban_ Players 224 posts 27,458 battles Report post #39 Posted December 19, 2022 Vor 11 Stunden, DudeWheresMyCarma sagte: So bad connection is some1 has on purpose? Cmon there is still alot of country's with mediocre internet at best. Ofc you don't have a bad connection on purpose. But when you KNOW you have a bad connection and disconnect every few minutes but you continue anyway you are egoistic and put the burden on your teammates on purpose. Compare it with having an infectious disease: Did you choose to get it? No. Do you have the choice to go to the concert you wanna see or stay at home? Yes. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[RONIN] 22cm Beta Tester 6,377 posts 36,662 battles Report post #40 Posted December 20, 2022 16 hours ago, Yedwy said: With a random opponent in a rock/paper/scissors concept (we wont even go into lizard/spock extension) really? He is not here to make sense, but to defend his employers ideas, even the stupid ones. Typical for autocrathic leadership in general or Russian leadership in particular, they dont accept any critic or different opinion, even if it is correct. 1 vs 1 Brawl with different ship classes is the most idiotic one. You need at least 3 ships in a team for some balance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[THESO] Nov_A Beta Tester 1,292 posts 13,123 battles Report post #41 Posted December 20, 2022 Yeah, dont be AFK, thats just bad and drags down ranked quality. Have the decency and at least do it like all the other 42% enjoyers and charge in at full speed for survival times under 2 minutes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] Seraphice WG Staff 1,664 posts 7,812 battles Report post #42 Posted December 20, 2022 19 hours ago, Yedwy said: With a random opponent in a rock/paper/scissors concept (we wont even go into lizard/spock extension) really? 17 hours ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said: I mean.. you even quoted him, how did you miss this? This hardly takes away from that fact that in 1v1 you are still most responsible for your team's performance. No teammates to blame for the results - good or bad. As for the ship dependency, this is something you can take into account before going into battle. And it isnt as if a bad player will win against good players all the time only because of the ship he picked. Happy holidays Captain! ~Sera 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PEZ] Yedwy Players 11,301 posts 39,586 battles Report post #43 Posted December 20, 2022 6 minutes ago, Seraphice said: . And it isnt as if a bad player will win against good players all the time only because of the ship he picked. No they wont BUT if you pick say Texas (to be in line with current format of Rank) and you draw a Kamikaze? Or if you pick say Ohio and draw a Somers or even a Shima? Or if you take out say IDK Baltimore and the enemy shows up in Massa or even Ncal/Vladivostok? Yeah if they are utterly potato you might win but otherwise hardly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] Seraphice WG Staff 1,664 posts 7,812 battles Report post #44 Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, Yedwy said: No they wont BUT if you pick say Texas (to be in line with current format of Rank) and you draw a Kamikaze? Or if you pick say Ohio and draw a Somers or even a Shima? Or if you take out say IDK Baltimore and the enemy shows up in Massa or even Ncal/Vladivostok? Yeah if they are utterly potato you might win but otherwise hardly So then you should be strategic in your pick. Part of it is the decisions before you go into battle, not only in battle. Take a ship that is decent against DDs, can fight cruisers and is able to win against battleships. Can think of a few... Happy holidays Captain! ~Sera Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[L-DI] coolrunings_99 Players 129 posts 14,939 battles Report post #45 Posted December 20, 2022 …here s hoping in vain none of them are suckmarines🤟😁 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PWN3D] Peffers Beta Tester 1,063 posts 22,995 battles Report post #46 Posted December 20, 2022 Worse than AKF are those that just sit there doing nothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[UWUWU] Kiagy Players 409 posts 9,933 battles Report post #47 Posted December 20, 2022 8 hours ago, Seraphice said: This hardly takes away from that fact that in 1v1 you are still most responsible for your team's performance. No teammates to blame for the results - good or bad. As for the ship dependency, this is something you can take into account before going into battle. And it isnt as if a bad player will win against good players all the time only because of the ship he picked. Happy holidays Captain! ~Sera Their should be a Ranked Season of 1v1 Each sprint could even specify different classes eg... Sprint 1- BB v BB, Sprint 2 Cruiser v Cruiser etc... With the final Sprint being "choose your own ship", obviously same tier Just a thought 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SFSO] Ymustihaveaname Players 362 posts 14,124 battles Report post #48 Posted December 20, 2022 1 hour ago, Kiagy said: Their should be a Ranked Season of 1v1 Each sprint could even specify different classes eg... Sprint 1- BB v BB, Sprint 2 Cruiser v Cruiser etc... With the final Sprint being "choose your own ship", obviously same tier Just a thought Would this not force you to only play a very small number of meta ships if you want to win? ie just like the 1v1 Brawls for BBs KM BBs with torps etc? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Karkong_the_Impaler Players 2,983 posts Report post #49 Posted December 21, 2022 23 hours ago, Seraphice said: So then you should be strategic in your pick But this in turn only leads to the same ships - Schlieffen anyone? - and then people try to strategize and use ships which work against that thing rather well, creating the .... not really enjoyable 1 on 1 experience. I personally use memetaur, as I find it fun to play and it's box of tricks gives me ample tools to murder almost any enemy. But getting pigeonholed into always the same "meta" ships is boring. I want to play other ships, say, Druid. I get Schlieffens down to 10% - and only because of that dented secondary mechanic, allowing zero skill players to still deal damage while rolling their face on the keyboard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DKMNL] CSS_modding_1 Players 362 posts Report post #50 Posted December 22, 2022 RANKED better say random all yust want to play bb and dont care if win ore loose make ranked one on one then its fair then they cant hide now u have bb,s who hide and the rest must cap ore just loose Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
