Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Macross_

Is the AA mechanism reform continuing?

17 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[YU_ZU]
Players
22 posts

The anti-aircraft guns give priority to shooting down the attack team, instead of attacking the standby team. When all the attack teams are destroyed, the attack will be disabled and wait for the next wave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
2 minutes ago, Macross_ said:

The anti-aircraft guns give priority to shooting down the attack team, instead of attacking the standby team. When all the attack teams are destroyed, the attack will be disabled and wait for the next wave

It wasn't "priority", as AA had chance to attack and damage attacking wing instead reserve.

 

As it was presented, it was buff for CVs as it could spread out damage on two planes damaging them, instead destroying one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
15,786 posts
26,801 battles
6 hours ago, Panocek said:

As it was presented, it was buff for CVs as it could spread out damage on two planes damaging them, instead destroying one.

 

It's not actually. It was later clarified that it targets one plane until it is destroyed, it just randomly picks whether that plane is gonna be from the attack wing or the rest of the squad.

Given that though I'm fairly certain it will never make it to live. Can't nerf the crutch class after all.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
2 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

 

It's not actually. It was later clarified that it targets one plane until it is destroyed, it just randomly picks whether that plane is gonna be from the attack wing or the rest of the squad.

Given that though I'm fairly certain it will never make it to live. Can't nerf the crutch class after all.

Well, they can introduce it and then add "Enterprise '44" or something, with gimmick being "replaces attack wing losses". You know, create a problem and sell a solution later:Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RONIN]
Players
791 posts
10,936 battles
2 minutes ago, Panocek said:

Well, they can introduce it and then add "Enterprise '44" or something, with gimmick being "replaces attack wing losses". You know, create a problem and sell a solution later:Smile_trollface:

:Smile_great:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Beta Tester
1,292 posts
13,123 battles

Ha! Look at this guy actually falling for WG's promises!

  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
6,636 posts
8 hours ago, Macross_ said:

The anti-aircraft guns give priority to shooting down the attack team, instead of attacking the standby team. When all the attack teams are destroyed, the attack will be disabled and wait for the next wave

That sounds way to fkn sensible to make it to live. Only stupid ideas make it.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts

Alone the fact that this is being discussed instead of the elephant in the room that is casual spotting.

If they would remove CV spotting or make it less inhumane, I wouldn't even mind the rest of the atrocious CV gameplay so badly.... but it's still basically this:

74cuec.gif.fe710061f369aa2d35d89ab74ecea88c.gif

 

 

 

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RO-RN]
Players
1,345 posts
21,361 battles

Like that would matter anymore. Wows is plagued with so many problems that is hopeless at this point. Only way for drastic changes is to own the game. So good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TAOWS]
Beta Tester
326 posts
9,639 battles
20 hours ago, Macross_ said:

The anti-aircraft guns give priority to shooting down the attack team, instead of attacking the standby team. When all the attack teams are destroyed, the attack will be disabled and wait for the next wave

The only carriers not affected by this, are the Soviet carriers who have just one squadron :Smile_trollface:

 

Also because of this new AA change, WG has to buff the carriers too. Alternative except Nakhimov and supercarriers, all other carriers will do 0 damage. So everyone will play damage farming Nakhimov and Chkalov. Which will make the situation worse not better. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[_I_]
Players
3,266 posts
27,734 battles
14 hours ago, El2aZeR said:

Given that though I'm fairly certain it will never make it to live. Can't nerf the crutch class after all.

I dont see that much will change. If this change actually would have an impact , it means average damage would go down.

 

If average damage goes down 10% then something will be buffed, like all weapons will deal 10% more damage...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[D-P-B]
[D-P-B]
Players
187 posts
20,018 battles
15 hours ago, Animalul2012 said:

Like that would matter anymore. Wows is plagued with so many problems that is hopeless at this point. Only way for drastic changes is to own the game. So good luck.

Anybody got Elon Musks number?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BREW]
Players
751 posts
10,882 battles
5 minuti fa, The_Norwood ha scritto:

Anybody got Elon Musks number?

 

Or you could gift an account to his son. :Smile_popcorn:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×