Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
VedranSeaWolf359

Are Gibraltar worth RP?

39 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
714 posts
11,265 battles

In two days I will have enough RP to take second RP ship thanks to Puerto Rico event. 

Are Gibraltar worth RP?

 

First RP Ship which I have is Colbert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,158 posts
25,223 battles

Whilst I like the Gibraltar she is very situational, she’s not the best RB ship but she has potential, you can certainly smack destroyers hard as well as broadside capital ships.

 

Fun but limited carry potential. 
 

Just be very aware of her smoke fire penalty, she pairs up well supporting your DDs because once you can kill the enemy spotter you can farm from within smoke. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
62,182 battles

I have it. It's one of the hardest cruisers to play. High and exposed citadel, bad firing angles of the rear turret when pushing and the front guns when kiting away, no torped so BBs push into your smoke easy, bad smoke firing penalty of 9.5km. so yeah, hard to play. But the AP is really nasty against light cruisers and DDs. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[H_FAN]
Players
3,293 posts
67,362 battles
24 minutes ago, VedranSeaWolf359 said:

In two days I will have enough RP to take second RP ship thanks to Puerto Rico event. 

Are Gibraltar worth RP?

 

First RP Ship which I have is Colbert.

I would rather take Ohio but that is me. It depends on what you like.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts

Aparently you can watch old replays from last patch:

 

 

 

So, if you're interested:

 

20221207_233425_PBSC610-Gibraltar_35_NE_north_winter.wowsreplay

 

This is of course an exceptional game. But notice how I casually blap the Alvaro for 10k until he abandons the cap and his submersible scum. See the (broadside) Mino get blapped, see the pants down Sherman die inside seconds - one reload necessary, and that is reasonably fast.

Neither the Napoli nor the Conq were really good players, I guess the most damage I got there were Napoli secondaries. But where you can't citadel with your short fuse AP, it takes a while.

 

It's not a ship for the feint of heart, just because it has a smoke it's certainly not a Minotaur on steroids. The only real advantage is the Minotaur acceleration and the agility (with rudder mod).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONI]
Players
1,622 posts
20,823 battles

It's situational, and like any AP-only ship it depends on enemies making mistakes.If they angle hard or go bow-on (including DDs!), most of your DPM is gone. If they rush you while doing this, you can't use your smoke. Unlike the tech-tree CLs it doesn't have particularly good concealment, so you can't sneak past most cruisers. It doesn't have good shell arcs for the caliber, so aiming can also be tricky. The firing angles are limited so you have to show too much broadside. In short, if the enemy has a brain, it's frustrating to play. It's not even a good co-op ship because bots like rushing you down, which is exactly what Gibraltar can't handle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts
[BONI]
Players
1,622 posts
20,823 battles

Honestly, if you want the Gibraltar playstyle (short-fuse-AP-only, no torps, smoke, hydro, fast acceleration) I say get Mysore instead. Way more comfortable. Concealment is actually good, smoke bloom is reasonable, smoke itself is pretty much objectively better unless you're trying to smoke up allies for some reason. Survivability-wise, this is tough for a t6 CL if you play right. You don't get the crazy DPM but you can still chunk DDs pretty good. It's just a fun little CL, whereas Gibraltar I find stressful to play and less consistent. It's just as bad for co-op though, if not worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts

How did you deceide?

 

I personally wouldn't, if I were you. Let's face it, you're not a very good player and what the tub doesn't abide is being mishandled. And in coop, it's (probably) positively trash, because most coop bots show less broadside than the bots in t10 randoms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,300 posts

I'm saving RPs for that new Commonwealth cruiser.

In the RP I have 4 ships left: Slava, Sevastopl, Druid and Gibraltar.

I think Gibraltar would be the last ship on this list I would get.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts
11 minutes ago, Fatal_Ramses said:

I think Gibraltar would be the last ship on this list I would get.

Depends on what you want to do with it. For hoarding it's entirely ok. If you want to actually use it, it's probably not such a great idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[YEET]
Players
3,009 posts
12,083 battles

Research bureau has one ship you get because it's good (Ohio) and a bunch of ships you get because you are bored and they look funny. Pick whichever one you think looks funniest. Gibraltar is pretty funny, it can oneshot destroyers better than Venezia can. I think that's funny, sending someone back to port before the clock hits 19:00 sounds funny. Yolo emilio is the funniest though so it wins the real research bureau ship contest for funniest ship. Yolo emilio is the OG shotgun, it was shotgunning people before the shotgun class was implemented.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[P7S]
Players
452 posts
On 12/9/2022 at 8:45 PM, VedranSeaWolf359 said:

 

Are Gibraltar worth RP?

 

 

Only if you take two of them!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMM]
[BBMM]
Players
8,818 posts
17,199 battles
22 hours ago, VedranSeaWolf359 said:

I keep RP for now I will open new topic and ask for suggestion which ship to take

If you want to smack DDs from smoke, I have Plymouth which is great for that. It's not for RP - steel ship. 

But that has smoke, radar and hydro. It is like a fat-bottomed crossbreed between Mino and a Belfast. 

 

For RP I got Ohio (a better Montana), Vampire 2 (a variant of Daring) and Paolo Yolo (that thing is hilarious). 
Not much else there I'm interested in, TBH. So I am keeping the RP as well in case something new comes up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,983 posts
2 minutes ago, BLUB__BLUB said:

If you want to smack DDs from smoke, I have Plymouth which is great for that. It's not for RP - steel ship. 

But that has smoke, radar and hydro. It is like a fat-bottomed crossbreed between Mino and a Belfast.  

It takes too much skill for a bad or mediocre player to make full use of it. If the only thing you can do is farm damage from smoke, you're better off with a Mino.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMM]
[BBMM]
Players
8,818 posts
17,199 battles
3 minutes ago, Karkong_the_Impaler said:

It takes too much skill for a bad or mediocre player to make full use of it. If the only thing you can do is farm damage from smoke, you're better off with a Mino.

I find it easier to play than a Mino (or maybe I'm just having bad/good luck). 
Taking the Plymouth to Clan Battles quite often - with good results. Would not even dream of doing that with a Mino... :Smile_hiding:

 

Just saying, if he is looking for a DD swatter... there it is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
714 posts
11,265 battles
18 hours ago, COPlUM said:

Research bureau has one ship you get because it's good (Ohio) and a bunch of ships you get because you are bored and they look funny. Pick whichever one you think looks funniest. Gibraltar is pretty funny, it can oneshot destroyers better than Venezia can. I think that's funny, sending someone back to port before the clock hits 19:00 sounds funny. Yolo emilio is the funniest though so it wins the real research bureau ship contest for funniest ship. Yolo emilio is the OG shotgun, it was shotgunning people before the shotgun class was implemented.

So are Ohio better in secondaries then Montana?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMM]
[BBMM]
Players
8,818 posts
17,199 battles
35 minutes ago, VedranSeaWolf359 said:

So are Ohio better in secondaries then Montana?

Here ya go.

 Ohio.jpg.fef9aee52fd197360e3c8baaf71ee89d.jpgMontana.jpg.76dbe640380a2bb963298e2cebdfaacf.jpg

 

The difference is, Ohio reloads faster, and has longer range. So yeah it has better secondaries (and 1% more fire chance).

Montana has 20 (10 x2),  Ohio has 20 (10x2) so no difference in the amount of guns. 

 

However it is not a Schlieffen or Preussen or Kürfürst. 

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[S-N-W]
[S-N-W]
Players
547 posts
13,817 battles

That's not stock Ohio though, is it.

 

If I go by the wiki, stock range is 7.5km (against 7.3km for the Montie), fire chance is 9% and reload is 3.5 seconds (to Montana's 4s).

 

Still better than the Montana. But not anywhere near as much. Definitely better than Vermont, which sits at 7.3km, 5% and 6 seconds, with two twin turrets less to boot.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×