Introduce a moratorium on the release of new premium ships

[evil_communist_from_ussr]

3 hours ago, Saltface said:

I don't need to go to the internet for literature as I will not discuss political philosophy and philosophy of the Law on the forum with someone that wants to apply it to premium ships. Because this is moronic to start with.

 

However, because cheap tricks don't work here, and you cannot look smart by telling us to go read something, I ll reference something for you.

Mind you, IMHO, You have never read or heard what you are talking about here when you were sober, and, maybe you have remotely heard about it  when you were trying to bed a communist [edited]e, so just read the following:

 

"All this is part of the systematic Soviet attempt to assimilate moral norms to legal norms, a process which tends to make morality as a whole increasingly "legalistic." "Legalism," of course, is not the same thing as "legality"; and the "rule of law" - a conception which Soviet writers repudiate as "bourgeois" - is distinct from both. "Socialist legality" means not the rule of law, but rather the rule of a Party by means of a (manipulable) legal system. Like its ancestor, "revolutionary legality," "socialist legality" is another name for "politicalized rule of law" - or "rule of politicalized law." Khrushchev criticizes Stalin for "violating socialist legality" not primarily as a dictator whose personal will ran counter to the dictates of an impersonal legal system, but as a Party leader whose political will ran counter to the Party interests vested in a politicalized legal system."

 

Now guys, do you really think this guy has any gray matter or it has been replaced with hay?

 

EDIT sorry forgot to put a source

Kline, George L., "Socialist Legality and Communist Ethics" (1963). Natural Law Forum. Paper 92.

retrieved from http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/nd_naturallaw_forum/92

why should I read and delve into this sheet of text if you pass on personal insults?

[MrWastee]

12 hours ago, chef_vvp said:

[...] framework of socialist legality!

now, plz enlighten us why and how anyone in the EU should be bothered ngh to even just check it up lol? or which worth legally it exactly got around here...

1/10

[HMS_Kilinowski]

On 12/1/2022 at 1:23 PM, chef_vvp said:

I suggest that the developer from lesta-games, and wargaming, as their general contractor, consider introducing a temporary moratorium on the production of premium ships, both for donations and for resources.
I explain my position.
I have been buying premiums in this game since 2015, the first was the battleship Nikolai 1, then warspite came out, tirpitz ... and so on. Each of these boats was excellent and a real pleasure to play on them. then, over time, some strange substances like Poltava, Boise, began to appear, the situation with premium content became like walking through a minefield, playing roulette - “how disgusting will the new premium be?”. the last straw was the release of Maya, anhalt and tokachi. Sorry, but this is very, very bad. You are letting the people who invest in your game. I have a 100% chance of hitting your anhalt on any other tier 8 premium battleship. Maya is much worse than myoko. I know what I'm writing. Tokachi is not bad in itself, but in the current meta of the game - a complete lack of fights in the top of the list, it's sad to get a one-shot anywhere from a tier 8 or 9 battleship. Was it weak to make this boat without a citadel, like a destroyer, thereby increasing its survivability in order to play in the current meta?
Next, we move on to ships for resources. Here the situation is better, but also needs to be revised. Either toxic imbs are produced - aircraft carriers and destroyers, or complete rubbish. from the game on "Sevastopol" is still nausea!  Or copy-pastes that do not give anything new in terms of gameplay - Mecklenburg is a pathetic parody of bourgogne, shikishima is a pathetic shadow of yamato, Why spend 30 thousand steel on them?
I suggest that wargaming develop a new concept for premium content and, after its public hearings and agreement with the game community, release new ships.
Sorry, but your "tokachi" have already got it!
The release of premium boats should be a holiday for a donator, but now it's the other way around!

 

I don't have Anhalt, but I got Maya and Tokachi and I don't share your sentiments. The new ships are not all weak. Personally yes, I prefer the ARP Myoko over the Maya, but that is a matter of playstyle. The Maya is more about ambushing DDs and smashing them with the gun reload booster, while the Myoko is designed for continuous damage while kiting away. Both ships are effective at their job.

 

And the Tokachi doesn't get on-shot anywhere, far from it. I tested it with my clan mate @OVanBrucein training room against several BBs. It got down to luck who won the engagement. Out of three duels, and ~100 hits, one hit was a full penetration. The rest was all overpens and sometimes even bounces. I am not sure on the reason for the bounces. I do suspect it is due to the missing torpedo protection compared to the Furutaka. For T8-/T9-BBs the overpens are even more pronounced due to the higher energy of the projectile. I'd say the only BBs that are problematic are the ones with short fuses.

 

Anyway, I don't see a pattern that would require Wargaming to reconsider their premium ship release. Yes, the phantasy ships are ridiculous, but that was not your criticism.

[Saltface]

1 hour ago, chef_vvp said:

why should I read and delve into this sheet of text if you pass on personal insults?

well two things here:

 

1. In your post number #30 you bring up "Socialist Legality" a concept that has been dead since the previous century. Not to mention that it caused the death of millions. However, I give you the benefit of doubt and I say "Either you use a translator that screws up what you want to say or you don't understand what you are writing. " 

Instead of using this opportunity to bail out you continue. This is a silly action. And when you do silly things you get called silly. No insult here. Just a reality check.

2. As if this wasn't enough you go on. Not only you did not use your opportunity to bail out but insisted, and suggested that I should "read the literature on the Internet on this issue, and everything will become clear to you." (sic)
In my opinion you don't know what you are talking about and you act stupid. So if I say so I am not insulting you, I am giving you a second reality check. You have read nothing about what you claim you know, you just found the word somewhere and thought it would be smart to pop it out of the blue in the forum. When someone is calling you out for your stupid actions he is not insulting you. One is merely pointing out reality.

 

And now to answer your question.

You should read and delve into this sheet of text so that you might learn something.

 

 

 

[evil_communist_from_ussr]

4 minutes ago, Saltface said:

well two things here:

 

1. In your post number #30 you bring up "Socialist Legality" a concept that has been dead since the previous century. Not to mention that it caused the death of millions. However, I give you the benefit of doubt and I say "Either you use a translator that screws up what you want to say or you don't understand what you are writing. " 

Instead of using this opportunity to bail out you continue. This is a silly action. And when you do silly things you get called silly. No insult here. Just a reality check.

2. As if this wasn't enough you go on. Not only you did not use your opportunity to bail out but insisted, and suggested that I should "read the literature on the Internet on this issue, and everything will become clear to you." (sic)
In my opinion you don't know what you are talking about and you act stupid. So if I say so I am not insulting you, I am giving you a second reality check. You have read nothing about what you claim you know, you just found the word somewhere and thought it would be smart to pop it out of the blue in the forum. When someone is calling you out for your stupid actions he is not insulting you. One is merely pointing out reality.

 

And now to answer your question.

You should read and delve into this sheet of text so that you might learn something.

 

 

 

read the works of Leonid Ilyich to fill in your gaps in Knowledge

[Viridem]

2 hours ago, chef_vvp said:

read the works of Leonid Ilyich to fill in your gaps in Knowledge

>Unironically recommends reading a communist dictator

 

Well, this explains so much.

I somehow felt it might be one of these cases, but I didn't expect it to be so severe.

I pray that you someday recover from your condition.

[WorthyOpponent]

15 hours ago, chef_vvp said:

 

if you consider these legendary ships to be clones, then this is a not comment

They are tech tree clones. If your argument is about historical ships you should've brought that up instead of ranting about CVs and DDs. 

[WorthyOpponent]

13 hours ago, stefanorgano said:

Let's give him credit where credit is due. Nikolai, Warspite and Tirpitz were introduced in WoWS looooong before Gangut, QE and Bismarck. How many people got Tirpitz back in the day just because Bismarck wasn't in the game yet?

Nice point, but this person buys everything so I doubt he had that in mind. His entire point is "Ship I like good, all ships I don't like bad. WG make ship I like, I bought them all. If you don't you bad." 

[159Hunter]

10 hours ago, chef_vvp said:

read the works of Leonid Ilyich to fill in your gaps in Knowledge

No thanks, I would like my country to thrive.

[Siagor]

10 hours ago, chef_vvp said:

read the works of Leonid Ilyich to fill in your gaps in Knowledge

 

OP, have you recently changed your name into this one?

From the one well known and ridiculed here?

 

And do you believe in numbers?

 

[COPlUM]

10 hours ago, chef_vvp said:

read the works of Leonid Ilyich to fill in your gaps in Knowledge

Good advice comrade, do you recommend I read some of his early works like "In gulag no one can hear you scream" or skip to his later works like "How to starve tens of millions of people in just 5 easy steps"
 

[MrWastee]

13 hours ago, chef_vvp said:

read the works of Leonid Ilyich to fill in your gaps in useless Knowledge

fify

[Saltface]

Dear disillusioned OP, @chef_vvp

 

Written between 1978 and 1979, Трилогия Брежнева consisting of Малая земля, Возрождение and Целина are published under the name of Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev. (use of Cyrillic script for romantic reasons)

Most probably Leonid Zamyatin wrote those books as Brezhnev, at the time of their publication was visibly senile and had severe trouble speaking is doubtful that he could have written them.

 

Nevertheless the fate of this literary opus is sad. In summer 1987, the books were removed from bookshops and turned into waste paper.

 

On the other hand - Архипелаг ГУЛАГ - The Gulag Archipelago: An Experiment in Literary Investigation by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn could be of interest.

 

[Fediuld]

On 12/1/2022 at 2:23 PM, chef_vvp said:

 I suggest that wargaming develop a new concept for premium content and, after its public hearings and agreement with the game community, release new ships.
 

Gaming is not democracy. 

[Yedwy]

@OP yeah they ll kill their prob 2nd best source of revenue after lootboxes couse some random guy suggested it on forums… Sure thing m8, lmao