Introduce a moratorium on the release of new premium ships

[evil_communist_from_ussr]

I suggest that the developer from lesta-games, and wargaming, as their general contractor, consider introducing a temporary moratorium on the production of premium ships, both for donations and for resources.
I explain my position.
I have been buying premiums in this game since 2015, the first was the battleship Nikolai 1, then warspite came out, tirpitz ... and so on. Each of these boats was excellent and a real pleasure to play on them. then, over time, some strange substances like Poltava, Boise, began to appear, the situation with premium content became like walking through a minefield, playing roulette - “how disgusting will the new premium be?”. the last straw was the release of Maya, anhalt and tokachi. Sorry, but this is very, very bad. You are letting the people who invest in your game. I have a 100% chance of hitting your anhalt on any other tier 8 premium battleship. Maya is much worse than myoko. I know what I'm writing. Tokachi is not bad in itself, but in the current meta of the game - a complete lack of fights in the top of the list, it's sad to get a one-shot anywhere from a tier 8 or 9 battleship. Was it weak to make this boat without a citadel, like a destroyer, thereby increasing its survivability in order to play in the current meta?
Next, we move on to ships for resources. Here the situation is better, but also needs to be revised. Either toxic imbs are produced - aircraft carriers and destroyers, or complete rubbish. from the game on "Sevastopol" is still nausea!  Or copy-pastes that do not give anything new in terms of gameplay - Mecklenburg is a pathetic parody of bourgogne, shikishima is a pathetic shadow of yamato, Why spend 30 thousand steel on them?
I suggest that wargaming develop a new concept for premium content and, after its public hearings and agreement with the game community, release new ships.
Sorry, but your "tokachi" have already got it!
The release of premium boats should be a holiday for a donator, but now it's the other way around!

[________________Morrison]

It's always a holiday for wg somewhere. ;)

 

Maya, Poltava, Anhalt & Cheshire. Aren't bad perse

 

But there are definitively better options.

 

But don't fret you'll either get OP trash that gets nerfed later on.

Or just straight up trash from the compactor

[evil_communist_from_ussr]

ok, you are releasing tirpitz in 2015! I still ride it! bend everything that swims around and the pleasure lasts 7 years!
you release tokachi and Maya ,,,... a month ago! I ride them 15 fights and will never do it again!
is this how it should be?

[Karasu_Browarszky]

The Accounting Department objects in the strongest possible terms.

 

Thank you for your understanding.

[Karasu_Browarszky]

13 minutes ago, Milfious said:

It's always a holiday for wg somewhere. ;)

 

Maya, Poltava, Anhalt & Cheshire. Aren't bad perse

 

But there are definitively better options.

 

But don't fret you'll either get OP trash that gets nerfed later on.

Or just straight up trash from the compactor

 

Per se is two words.

[MrWastee]

9 minutes ago, chef_vvp said:

ok, you are releasing tirpitz in 2015! I still ride it! bend everything that swims around and the pleasure lasts 7 years!
you release tokachi and Maya ,,,... a month ago! I ride them 15 fights and will never do it again!
is this how it should be?

kinda funny on how u prove urself on how subjective ur impression is ^^.... as 4 me, imo maya along with lazo is probably the most potent t7 kiting cruiser. yet only 6 matches 4 me, given that, but until now it's a powerhouse. in other words: no surprise that with growing diversity theres ships INDIVIDUAL players will like more or less or perform better/worse than others do. nothing to see here...

 

2cts

[Port_Authority]

"Moratorium"? Any company that uses such a word in official communique puts itself in a bad position to begin with. So good luck with that.
As for the influx of premiums vs taking care of the balancing, it is the financing model of the game currently.

WG knows there's a part of the playerbase that wants to spend monthly amounts into the game and not just "maybe open wallet" if WG gives them a bargain.

 

 

[NewHorizons_1]

Quote

Introduce a moratorium on the release of new premium ships

You are quite free to do that yourself.

No one has to buy a new premium ship when it comes out.

Or, at least, wait a while for reviews on it and see if it fits with your play-style.

[________________Morrison]

31 minutes ago, chef_vvp said:

ok, you are releasing tirpitz in 2015! I still ride it! bend everything that swims around and the pleasure lasts 7 years!
you release tokachi and Maya ,,,... a month ago! I ride them 15 fights and will never do it again!
is this how it should be?

Wel, its the digital equivelant of the modern version of anything.

 

We are capable of making things that can last for years.

 

Yet we refuse to do so because we want to make money.

 

So we intentionally make faulty things. 

Or in this games sense. Just produce trash straight up. Then replace it with new trash 6 months later.

[Karasu_Browarszky]

5 minutes ago, Milfious said:

Wel, its the digital equivelant of the modern version of anything.

 

We are capable of making things that can last for years.

 

Yet we refuse to do so because we want to make money.

 

So we intentionally make faulty things. 

Or in this games sense. Just produce trash straight up. Then replace it with new trash 6 months later.

 

Recycling?

[Varian_Dorn]

49 minutes ago, chef_vvp said:

I suggest that the developer from lesta-games, and wargaming, as their general contractor, consider introducing a temporary moratorium on the production of premium ships, both for donations and for resources.
I explain my position.
I have been buying premiums in this game since 2015, the first was the battleship Nikolai 1, then warspite came out, tirpitz ... and so on. Each of these boats was excellent and a real pleasure to play on them. then, over time, some strange substances like Poltava, Boise, began to appear, the situation with premium content became like walking through a minefield, playing roulette - “how disgusting will the new premium be?”. the last straw was the release of Maya, anhalt and tokachi. Sorry, but this is very, very bad. You are letting the people who invest in your game. I have a 100% chance of hitting your anhalt on any other tier 8 premium battleship. Maya is much worse than myoko. I know what I'm writing. Tokachi is not bad in itself, but in the current meta of the game - a complete lack of fights in the top of the list, it's sad to get a one-shot anywhere from a tier 8 or 9 battleship. Was it weak to make this boat without a citadel, like a destroyer, thereby increasing its survivability in order to play in the current meta?
Next, we move on to ships for resources. Here the situation is better, but also needs to be revised. Either toxic imbs are produced - aircraft carriers and destroyers, or complete rubbish. from the game on "Sevastopol" is still nausea!  Or copy-pastes that do not give anything new in terms of gameplay - Mecklenburg is a pathetic parody of bourgogne, shikishima is a pathetic shadow of yamato, Why spend 30 thousand steel on them?
I suggest that wargaming develop a new concept for premium content and, after its public hearings and agreement with the game community, release new ships.
Sorry, but your "tokachi" have already got it!
The release of premium boats should be a holiday for a donator, but now it's the other way around!

Do you have some compulsive premium ship buying disorder?

 

Nobody forces you to buy anything. The only actual vote one has in regards to offered premium content is whether or not one thinks its worth the money. You like it, you buy it. Don´t like it or you´re not sure, don´t buy it.

 

Did anyone force you to buy Maya? It was clear as day what this ship is from the first announcement. How about you inform yourself about a new release and then actually THINK about if you wanna buy it or not.

 

This posting is the most ridiculous thing I´ve read in a while. And thats saying something, especially on this forum.

[NewHorizons_1]

1 minute ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

Recycling?

That'll be the copy / paste department.

[evil_communist_from_ussr]

7 minutes ago, Varian_Dorn said:

Do you have some compulsive premium ship buying disorder?

 

Nobody forces you to buy anything. The only actual vote one has in regards to offered premium content is whether or not one thinks its worth the money. You like it, you buy it. Don´t like it or you´re not sure, don´t buy it.

 

Did anyone force you to buy Maya? It was clear as day what this ship is from the first announcement. How about you inform yourself about a new release and then actually THINK about if you wanna buy it or not.

 

This posting is the most ridiculous thing I´ve read in a while. And thats saying something, especially on this forum.

how smart you are!
Where are you from?
For example, my country has a Consumer Rights Act. According to which I can return any item to the store within 14 days, because it did not suit me. With a number of conditions, of course, such as the absence of visible traces of operation and the presence of commodity packaging. Restriction - medicines, food and so on.

before buying a car, I can run it in, steer, completely climb around and sit inside, in a car dealership, checking driving performance and ergonomics.
I don't see wargaming giving me the benefit of a test drive before buying or a return option.

[tocqueville8]

1 hour ago, chef_vvp said:

shikishima is a pathetic shadow of yamato

 

I'm not seeing it 

[evil_communist_from_ussr]

 

.

[evil_communist_from_ussr]

28 minutes ago, NewHorizons_1 said:

You are quite free to do that yourself.

No one has to buy a new premium ship when it comes out.

Or, at least, wait a while for reviews on it and see if it fits with your play-style.

reviews from whom? from super jedi or jellyfish?

funny....

[NewHorizons_1]

31 minutes ago, chef_vvp said:

reviews from whom? from super jedi or jellyfish?

funny....

In the past, LittleWhiteMouse used to do excellent reviews of premium ships.

But, in lieu of that you can still ask on the forum - there are plenty of experienced players here that can offer informed opinions on how good a ship is.

 

Edit : LWM's back catalogue of reviews - https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/210980-mouses-catalog-of-ship-reviews/

 

[________________Morrison]

20 minutes ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

 

Recycling?

Don't need to recycle digital waste.

 

Just make new digital waste.

[Karasu_Browarszky]

14 minutes ago, Milfious said:

Don't need to recycle digital waste.

 

Just make new digital waste.

 

Waste not want not.

[Fatal_Ramses]

1 hour ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

 

Per se is two words.

Not if you speak finnish 

[Karasu_Browarszky]

18 minutes ago, Fatal_Ramses said:

Not if you speak finnish 

 

Must make a note of that.

[________________Morrison]

 

10 minutes ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

 

Must make a note of that.

Well as a dutch person this does not apply to me.

[COPlUM]

2 hours ago, chef_vvp said:

Either toxic imbs are produced - aircraft carriers and destroyers, or complete rubbish.

I agree with the general sentiment that there are too many premiums coming out all the time and many of them are kinda useless but what's this about? What's your problem with destroyers lol. And nobody forces you to buy all premium ships?! Obviously if you buy all of them you won't be happy with some of them, that's just common sense. Do you walk into a bakery, buy and eat every cake they have without even checking what you're buying, then complain that you didn't like some of the cakes.

[________________Morrison]

22 minutes ago, COPlUM said:

I agree with the general sentiment that there are too many premiums coming out all the time and many of them are kinda useless but what's this about? What's your problem with destroyers lol. And nobody forces you to buy all premium ships?! Obviously if you buy all of them you won't be happy with some of them, that's just common sense. Do you walk into a bakery, buy and eat every cake they have without even checking what you're buying, then complain that you didn't like some of the cakes.

Well one valid way of giving an oppinion is buying and trying I guess so. Could be aplicable

[MrWastee]

2 hours ago, chef_vvp said:

[...]

I don't see wargaming giving me the benefit of a test drive before buying or a return option.

i won't comment on the fallacy in comparing actual goods to digital ones, BUT u can take a testride by company policy. buy a prem, do a max of >1< battle in it and support >mooost likely< will refund on request >in dubloons only(!!!)<.

 

they, by law, don't need to do this.

 

nther 2cts