Update 0.11.10: Japanese Light Cruisers

[The_EURL_Guy]

Get ready for Early Access to new Japanese cruisers; U.S. and German submarines in the Tech Tree; and a whole lot more!

Read it on the portal

[WorthyOpponent]

Quote

U.S. AND GERMAN SUBMARINES IN THE TECH TREE

Normally Early Access takes 2 patches but clearly WG wanted to make an exception with subs and gave us these marvelous designs earlier than normal. Ah, WG, what have we done as the playerbase to deserve such an act of generosity?  
 

Quote

More details about the Battle Pass will be available in a dedicated article.

Still not too late to announce it was just some Halloween trick and won't go live, since we got no treats, I think we deserve that. 

 

Quote

The unsporting conduct penalty system has received a number of improvements in Update 0.11.10.

The main goals of these changes are to improve and generally make the definition of inaction in battle more accurate, as well as to eliminate situations where players could, for various reasons, avoid penalties for unsporting conduct. We've finalized and added to the existing criteria, and we've also updated the procedure for checking players for the violator status.
 

For users with the Windows 10 operating system, a system notification has been added with a suggestion to return to the battle if the client was minimized during the battle.

Ah yes, improvement, also known as "Punishing players for Alt+Tab'ing during an already extremely slow paced game".

 

Quote

Black Friday

Black Friday content has been added to the game:

• "Black" versions of  X Napoli,  IX Kearsarge,  VIII Mainz,  VIII Chkalov, and  VI Shinonome.
• Five themed flags and five patches.

Because selling T10 ships directly at the shop is considered okay by WG and after ARP Yamato no one told them to cut it. Don't worry komrad we already got used to it like the rest of the bad changes.

 

Quote

New ships

The following ships have been added for testing by developers, supertesters, and community contributors:  VIII Nebraska,  IX Delaware,  X Louisiana

 Because the one thing missing from the game was obviously more planes!

[electro75]

yes, ryujo still had to be broken.. as you have already broken enough ships, with the so-called feedback from some whiners.. feedback, to break ryujo you should have at least 50 matches with him.. and so the aircraft carriers 6  -8 are crap.. at a random where you meet level 7-8 ryujo is like non-existent.. in the game balance like wows.. don't make improvements because they are cabbage .. just broken..

[quickr]

Quote

A new heroic achievement—Combat Scout—has been added to the game.

It only took them 7 years to figure this out. Just as subs are being released. DDs truly are the least favourite child.

 

And I don't see: "Fixed an artillery bug" anywhere on the list.

[electro75]

sorry for the bad english.. google knows how to translate well

[WorthyOpponent]

4 minutes ago, electro75 said:

feedback, to break ryujo you should have at least 50 matches with him..

Which is ironic since you don't have that amount, why would you eliminate your own feedback 
 

And yes, Ryujo is broken, in the sense that it is overpowered.

10 minutes ago, electro75 said:

with the so-called feedback from some whiners

Said the guy, as he whined...

 

[YabbaCoe]

12 minutes ago, WorthyOpponent said:

Normally Early Access takes 2 patches but clearly WG wanted to make an exception with subs and gave us these marvelous designs earlier than normal. Ah, WG, what have we done as the playerbase to deserve such an act of generosity?  
 

Still not too late to announce it was just some Halloween trick and won't go live, since we got no treats, I think we deserve that. 

 

Ah yes, improvement, also known as "Punishing players for Alt+Tab'ing during an already extremely slow paced game".

 

Because selling T10 ships directly at the shop is considered okay by WG and after ARP Yamato no one told them to cut it. Don't worry komrad we already got used to it like the rest of the bad changes.

 

 Because the one thing missing from the game was obviously more planes!

You are right, that usually we have 2 patches of Early Access when releasing a new line. But with Subs, it was actually very different to other ship line release we had in past. Generally with new ships, only testers actually can try those in advance. But with subs, everybody had the option to play with even tier X ones in past and also for quite a long time. Also this Early Access consisted of 2 lines at the same time, which is also unusal to previous EAs. 

And also, as it is visible, we still wanted to release japanese cruisers before Christmas.

Regarding Battle Pass article, it will be done closer to the release of the Update itself to live server. But generally the majority of details were already provided in DevBlogs and in this patchnotes we covered the basics.

[electro75]

4 minutes ago, WorthyOpponent said:

Ceea ce este ironic din moment ce nu ai acea sumă, de ce ai elimina propriul feedback 
 

Și da, Ryujo este rupt, în sensul că este copleșit.

A spus tipul, în timp ce se văita...

 

I don't know if you played with ryujo level 6 in random where many level 7-8 ships appear and if you could do something with him in that match.. yes if the balance is maintained to play with level 5-6-7 ships maybe  he was strong..but so...

[WorthyOpponent]

Just now, electro75 said:

I don't know if you played with ryujo level 6 in random where many level 7-8 ships appear and if you could do something with him in that match.. yes if the balance is maintained to play with level 5-6-7 ships maybe  he was strong..but so...

I have, I played her in ranked too. Just dodge the flak like you normally would and leave heavy AA targets to the last just like you would do with any other CV. It's a very simple logic really. 

[electro75]

I'm not complaining.. I played a lot with ryujo.. I think I have over 400 games with it.. but I think it's only good for scenarios after which it breaks

[quickr]

3 minutes ago, electro75 said:

I think I have more than 400 games with it

25 randoms + 143 in coop

[electro75]

6 minutes ago, WorthyOpponent said:

Am jucat-o și eu la ranked. Doar ocoliți atacul așa cum ați face de obicei și lăsați ținte grele AA la final, așa cum ați face cu orice alt CV. Este o logică foarte simplă. 

do not compare ranked where the same level or +1 is played with random level +2 above

[WorthyOpponent]

2 minutes ago, electro75 said:

I'm not complaining.. I played a lot with ryujo.. I think I have over 400 games with it.. but I think it's only good for scenarios after which it breaks

If this is your only account, you have 25 games with her, then an additional 18 in Ranked. 

[electro75]

4 minutes ago, quickr said:

25 aleatorii + 143 în coop

yes and 400+, in scenarios.. I have played a few in random because it's not worth it.. and after "improvement", it's really not worth it anymore

[Animalul2012]

None of the aiming bugs fixed, guess all the funds been relocated to the submarine development....

[WorthyOpponent]

12 minutes ago, electro75 said:

I have played a few in random because it's not worth it

Except it is, you just have to git gud instead of whining. 

 

12 minutes ago, electro75 said:

yes and 400+, in scenarios

Don't matter. Scenarios and co op don't determine nor demonstrate a ship's strength. 

[quickr]

15 minutes ago, electro75 said:

yes and 400+, in scenarios..

Yes, cos it's the same shooting at bots in coop/ops and bots in rand.... oh wait, nevermind

[MightyMac22]

Ok so if you insist on punishing players for unsporting conduct then lets have a clear definition of what that actually is and have a realistic way of proving it.

Say I play a DD and because my cruiser escort decides to unsportingly about turn and stop supporting me, I then cant contest the cap because maybe I am a Torp boat and the enemy is a gunboat that I have no chance against.

Do I then get punished for my lack of input intro the game if a team mate decides to report me as unsporting ?

 

 Also if you are dead why cant you leave the game and start another ? I have had a warning for trying to do this before. 

 

 

[YabbaCoe]

13 minutes ago, MightyMac22 said:

Ok so if you insist on punishing players for unsporting conduct then lets have a clear definition of what that actually is and have a realistic way of proving it.

Say I play a DD and because my cruiser escort decides to unsportingly about turn and stop supporting me, I then cant contest the cap because maybe I am a Torp boat and the enemy is a gunboat that I have no chance against.

Do I then get punished for my lack of input intro the game if a team mate decides to report me as unsporting ?

 

 Also if you are dead why cant you leave the game and start another ? I have had a warning for trying to do this before. 

 

 

No, if you are actively participating in the battle, than you won't get that "Unsportsmanlike" behaviour notification. Those requierements can vary for classes.

But if you are destroyed in the battle, you are allowed to leave. You also didn't receive punishment for exiting the battle once you are dead before. 

[Valkyrie_Hound]

29 minutes ago, MightyMac22 said:

Ok so if you insist on punishing players for unsporting conduct then lets have a clear definition of what that actually is and have a realistic way of proving it.

Say I play a DD and because my cruiser escort decides to unsportingly about turn and stop supporting me, I then cant contest the cap because maybe I am a Torp boat and the enemy is a gunboat that I have no chance against.

Do I then get punished for my lack of input intro the game if a team mate decides to report me as unsporting ?

 

 Also if you are dead why cant you leave the game and start another ? I have had a warning for trying to do this before. 

 

 

Are you suggesting that players would actually abuse the reporting system? Even if they do a member of WG staff personally watches the game to confirm the infraction. Don't they?

[MightyMac22]

40 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

No, if you are actively participating in the battle, than you won't get that "Unsportsmanlike" behaviour notification. Those requierements can vary for classes.

But if you are destroyed in the battle, you are allowed to leave. You also didn't receive punishment for exiting the battle once you are dead before. 

 

 Ok so what is the mechanic that decides if someone has been "Unsporting"  ?

We have established that leaving early counts, but the friendly fire counter is a huge number of shots before you are punished so would only logging out early once get you a warning ? seems heavy handed by comparison.

Do you just straight loose your credits etc with no warning ?

People do and will have issues they can not help and will from time to time have to leave the game/controls

Basically a little explanation of how its going to work would really be appreciated now that people stand to loose credits etc from it.

[charliecho]

This is what i am talking about.

They just made again a totaly [edited]pointless rule. If you send a video if a DD swimming at the A line the whole time they still dont give a [edited]about it. So where is the point this new system? If you push the wasd dont give nathing. If you die then go to the next battle. What is the different between? :D Some kidds cryed about this report function? You think achived again something? :D
The best way when someone have chat bann and they cant even say samthing why goes there or why do something. 1 usless idiot who dont know how the game work start screaming at the chat to " report him " and he give 2-3 report and done. What a nice fair play system. I wanna see how the BB's desapeer from the game. Couse every camping BB will give report.
Or look the CV's. xD They nowdays give report couse they are CV. Now they will banning unspupporting be couse the players reporting them for no reason just for funn and why nor couse it CV.

Maybe dear WG if you playing with your fucked up game wich going time to time worst and worst  then maybe but only maybe see where is or what is the problem. This rule as i said just turn away more player from your game. As the chat bann doing very well.

[buccaneer_invader]

very Nation should have at least one SUBMARINE TO USE BY NOW.

[S_h_i_v_a]

Subs, more Subs, Battlepass.....

 

 

[416taylor]

A miffo Dasha??????????????????????

We want Dasha back