[MORIA] quickr Players 1,953 posts 25,232 battles Report post #1 Posted October 7, 2022 Taken from my NA acc as I don't have a clan on EU to check: Bonus points for subs that are not even in tech tree? woot? 23 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] T0byJug Quality Poster 5,358 posts 25,524 battles Report post #2 Posted October 7, 2022 3 minutes ago, quickr said: Taken from my NA acc as I don't have a clan on EU to check: Bonus points for subs that are not even in tech tree? woot? Ok that is suprising and a little dumb as we have never had Comonwealth ships in Naval Battles (as there are only Prems ) or Pan Asian BB as again they are only prems. It supprises me they have added IJN subs 10 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POT80] SurfaceFish [POT80] Players 1,261 posts 11,256 battles Report post #3 Posted October 7, 2022 EU here, looks the same. Where the Hell are ribbons for French and Italian CV? They don't have tech tree and only premiums. So why does only IJN and Soviet subs get special treatment? When it comes to early access money making, WG have no standard. 12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[R7S] lovelacebeer Players 4,158 posts 25,223 battles Report post #4 Posted October 7, 2022 This doesn’t reek of desperation whatsoever… 4 18 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BYOB] Aragathor Players 7,047 posts 32,314 battles Report post #5 Posted October 7, 2022 The WoWS team is desperate to show executives that subs are liked, wanted, and played. Anyone who saw yesterday's update stream knows better. If this keeps up, someone might get promoted out. 12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POT80] SurfaceFish [POT80] Players 1,261 posts 11,256 battles Report post #6 Posted October 7, 2022 8 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CDD] Dutchy_2019 Players 1,927 posts 13,486 battles Report post #7 Posted October 7, 2022 4 hours ago, quickr said: Taken from my NA acc as I don't have a clan on EU to check: Bonus points for subs that are not even in tech tree? woot? This is also the case for EU, my clan had 2x for the Soviet and IJN submarine. Absolutely unacceptable that this happens. And I know that some CCs at least have already started yelling at WG in the WG CC Discord about this. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] Seraphice WG Staff 1,664 posts 7,808 battles Report post #8 Posted October 7, 2022 Hey guys, We're seeing if we can adjust this ASAP or at least adjust it starting next week. Fair seas captain! ~Sera 2 16 4 6 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ROUGH] Yamashiro42 Players 1,065 posts 26,558 battles Report post #9 Posted October 7, 2022 5 minutes ago, Seraphice said: Hey guys, We're seeing if we can adjust this ASAP or at least adjust it starting next week. Fair seas captain! ~Sera Adjust which way? By adding other combinations of nation+class that only have premium ships? Or by removing these two premium-only combinations (Soviet and Japanese submarines)? 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] Seraphice WG Staff 1,664 posts 7,808 battles Report post #10 Posted October 7, 2022 7 minutes ago, Yamashiro42 said: Adjust which way? By adding other combinations of nation+class that only have premium ships? Or by removing these two premium-only combinations (Soviet and Japanese submarines)? I'm afraid that I don't have the details for this right now. Fair seas captain! ~Sera 1 14 3 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TRSW] M_A_E_stro Players 109 posts 8,816 battles Report post #11 Posted October 7, 2022 Guys, look at this what i saw in the video of Flamu. Haha you can't be serious. 16 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-NSC-] Ansell74 [-NSC-] Players 10 posts 45,908 battles Report post #12 Posted October 7, 2022 Is this another case of "miscommunication"? 2 11 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NSVE] iFax [NSVE] Players 535 posts 20,281 battles Report post #13 Posted October 7, 2022 36 minutes ago, Seraphice said: Hey guys, We're seeing if we can adjust this ASAP or at least adjust it starting next week. Fair seas captain! ~Sera Seeing as those options were selected and deployed on the server, that's not a fix... Although legally it is... "A fix"... 2 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] Seraphice WG Staff 1,664 posts 7,808 battles Report post #14 Posted October 7, 2022 33 minutes ago, M_A_E_stro said: Guys, look at this. Haha you can't be serious. This is not the case. Please dont spread fake screenshots 1 13 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guest 0 posts Report post #15 Posted October 7, 2022 52 minutes ago, Seraphice said: Hey guys, We're seeing if we can adjust this ASAP or at least adjust it starting next week. Fair seas captain! ~Sera Oh, another accidental "bug" and miscommunication both at once? How surprising. 1 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CMWR] Lootboxer Players 3,817 posts 21,306 battles Report post #16 Posted October 7, 2022 There is still potential for more... . 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CMWR] Lootboxer Players 3,817 posts 21,306 battles Report post #17 Posted October 7, 2022 13 minutes ago, Seraphice said: This is not the case. Please dont spread fake screenshots You know it looks even worse as premiums only have 2x multiplier. Nice self trolling 6 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-NSC-] Ansell74 [-NSC-] Players 10 posts 45,908 battles Report post #18 Posted October 7, 2022 7 minutes ago, Seraphice said: This is not the case. Please dont spread fake screenshots Uhm.. don't think so. Though the IJN and RU SS are fixed, it doesn't mean that you can't get more subs in naval battle. Since the rest are selected random there is a chance that the rest can be selected to. 3 SS missions can occur, which i've seen, while 4 might be very seldom. Still... kind of weird you get upset about this, when the case is that there isn't a tech-tree for IJN and RU, and you lock these 2. I won't claim it is to make people buy more of these... But it looks extremely suspicious. 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ZED] _Kokushibo_ Players 146 posts 26,084 battles Report post #19 Posted October 7, 2022 53 minutes ago, Seraphice said: I'm afraid that I don't have the details for this right now. Fair seas captain! ~Sera At least your predecessors were better at lying. But then, the standards were higher too. 4 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HAIFU] Easha Players 368 posts Report post #20 Posted October 7, 2022 16 minutes ago, Seraphice said: Please dont spread fake screenshots Yes, how dare you! Only the IJN and Soviet submarine bonuses are rigged server-wide after all. Wargaming would always be subtle about increasing their income with every game mechanic change. As subtle as only making the visual camo for the Hawke during the last early access available for free - while you had to pay for the bonus package. How convenient they were able to split that instead of granting you a perma camo with economical advantages like back then when they were still combined. But hey, what do we expect? The removal of free flags for achievement was explained with UI-changes. Eagle Eye being removed was explained by stating it was not strong enough (because they just explained it in the same sentence alongside the plenty other skills that really were useless). There is no need for miscommunication when you have confidence in your own ridiculous statements. And now shut up and pay them instead of spreading fake screenshots. Yours sincerely, Easha 15 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ROUGH] Yamashiro42 Players 1,065 posts 26,558 battles Report post #21 Posted October 7, 2022 21 minutes ago, Seraphice said: This is not the case. Please dont spread fake screenshots So do you admit that the naval battle is set in a way that two double bonuses are always assigned to Soviet and Japanese submarines, while the other three are random? Just like in the case of my clan: 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SEK-A] ArendB_2018 Players 640 posts 35,762 battles Report post #22 Posted October 7, 2022 Vor 54 Minuten, Ansell74 sagte: Is this another case of "miscommunication"? No just another non-communication. And WG just promoting the subs and try to sell more packages 1000 dubloons each to people trying to get the premium subs. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TRSW] M_A_E_stro Players 109 posts 8,816 battles Report post #23 Posted October 7, 2022 29 dakika önce, Seraphice dedi: This is not the case. Please dont spread fake screenshots An image taken from the last video of Flamu is not related to me, I don't know if it's fake or not, but right now, I don't think the photo is fake when there are 2x for exactly 3 different Subs in our fleet's naval battles: 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HAKUY] Yosha_AtaIante Players 8,032 posts 19,168 battles Report post #24 Posted October 7, 2022 2 minutes ago, M_A_E_stro said: An image taken from the last video of Flamu is not related to me, I don't know if it's fake or not, but right now, I don't think the photo is fake when there are 2x for exactly 3 different Subs in our fleet's naval battles: you posted this one originally. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TRSW] M_A_E_stro Players 109 posts 8,816 battles Report post #25 Posted October 7, 2022 4 dakika önce, AtaIante dedi: you posted this one originally. As I said, the visual is in the video of Flamu. 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
