Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
The_EURL_Guy

Update 0.11.9: Submarines

202 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[UK-RN]
Players
1,345 posts
35,699 battles
6 hours ago, ReDiR20 said:

The typical forum member here:

I hate everything new to the game, give me the same ship and I'll pay and play this for 10 years! Even if new addition is tested and fits into the theme I still hate it for the reason of hating! Learning to play against subs or CV? NEVER!!! Easier to just whine here spread the hate around! And I'm strictly free to play but I still speak for everyone! Only my opinion matters!

 

Pretty arrogant to label experienced forumites/players as "typical", wouldn`t you say? :fish_palm:

 

No, you are not speaking for everyone.

  • Cool 4
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UK-RN]
Players
1,345 posts
35,699 battles
7 hours ago, admiraldelorin said:

Amen.

 

To the ones looking forward,  have fun!

 

To the naysayers please quit, get out, go home.. make your own game.  DO IT ALREADY !!

 

Says a guy with hidden stats. *slowclap*

Where do you guys come from? Having probably only a fraction of the average Battle count of the forumites here - still you need to lecture us?

 

As hard it is to believe: Some of these very forumites care deeply about the game.

 

Subs in their current iteration are just broken and a bad design.

They add zero value to the game, except the "fun" potential of the sub player himself.

  • Cool 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DIE]
[DIE]
Players
10 posts

Hey WG, promise to keep playing if you go full retard and add cruise missiles and nuclear bombs ....

Totally forgot , I also want my UFO flying carrier or at least an I400 series sub / hybrid carrier as premium  , thanks a lot!

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
307 posts

I am sure that wargaming designers not able to make this beautiful super model in this 3Dgame............:Smile_Default:

A Super Submarine Aircraft-Carrier!  :Smile_great:  a wow for wows!  

 

 

 

Super Submarine Aircraft-Carrier.jpg

Edited by _3856794_561538473_
super 3d models
  • Cool 2
  • Funny 3
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AOLH]
[AOLH]
Players
31 posts

PURCHASE, PURCHASE, PURCHASE, PURCHASE, PURCHASE, PURCHASE, PURCHASE, PURCHASE,  the only word WOW understand. What's the point on purchase anything when 80% dont understand TEAM playing and ruin the game. It's time for me to save up some money right now starting today.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONI]
Players
1,622 posts
20,823 battles

Subs should have a larger variety of modifications available for the t6 and t8 slots, where currently the rudder mods are far and away the best options.

  • Boring 2
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DC_DK]
Players
351 posts
1 hour ago, MoveZig said:

Subs should have a larger variety of modifications available for t6 and t8, where currently the rudder mods are far and away the best options.

I think that homing torps should be removed ..... :cap_old:

I would of course prefer NO subs at all!

  • Cool 7
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester, In AlfaTesters
5,710 posts
13,399 battles

I Fully Support the Implementation of Submarines.

 

But Seriously. They are not Ready.

Implementing them in this State will turn it into a Dumpster Fire of similar proportions as CVs.

And this Dumpster Fire hasnt even been put out properly as of yet.

 

As such I cant say I am happy about this Move.

It will destroy Support for Submarines even Further and for the next 2 Years we are going to have the same rubbish as with CVs.

Where Subs will constantly receive Major Changes in an attempt to somehow make them work properly.

Of course accompanied by constant Fighting in the Forums...

 

And the Joke is. You say in the Update that you wont make any Big Changes to Subs for a few Months.

But at the same Time you make some MASSIVE Untested Changes to Subs....

This will already massively alter Game Balance and cause massive Complaints....

 

 

 

 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[IDDQD]
[IDDQD]
Korzár
1,048 posts
15,398 battles
Před 2 hodinami buccaneer_invader řekl/a:

Still no British Submarines.

British submarines will come in 0.11.9 for testing.

They will not be availible for players at least 2 updates. I think, we can expect early acces in december (or end of november).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONI]
Players
1,622 posts
20,823 battles
1 hour ago, MotomanDK said:

I think that homing torps should be removed ..... :cap_old:

I would of course prefer NO subs at all!

I'd be okay with only unguided torps if they're good enough, but then subs basically couldn't sink each other.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
604 posts
15,920 battles
16 hours ago, ReDiR20 said:

The typical forum member here:

I hate everything new to the game, give me the same ship and I'll pay and play this for 10 years! Even if new addition is tested and fits into the theme I still hate it for the reason of hating! Learning to play against subs or CV? NEVER!!! Easier to just whine here spread the hate around! And I'm strictly free to play but I still speak for everyone! Only my opinion matters!

You definitly NOT SPEAK INSTEAD OF ME! :etc_swear:

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DC_DK]
Players
351 posts
10 minutes ago, MoveZig said:

I'd be okay with only unguided torps if they're good enough, but then subs basically couldn't sink each other.

Well thats probably true.

I did some experiment during the latest PT, and the result - for me atleast - is, that i need to go minimum 30knots and have a turning circle of less than 600meters to dodge homing torps - i can press R to mitigate homing, but then the sub just ping me again. So this basically only apply to fast agile DD's.

PLUS if i am in a DD gun fight i cannot concentrate on dodging = so i die!  That is NOT fun.

  • Cool 4
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
604 posts
15,920 battles

Better not say what I think about this update or I will get very long ban. I guess if I stay, that will be in mode WITHOUT subs and also just right now start again regrind of dd line. Didn't plan to regrind, but obviously I will need Slava if I deside to stay... RIP my fun and great sec. bbs :Smile_sad:

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,510 posts
8,242 battles
On 10/3/2022 at 3:08 PM, YabbaCoe said:

 

Brand new class of ships can bring new frightening danger, but on the other hand also plenty new gameplay opportunities and changes. 

 

That smacks of something a doctor would say when they're informing a person they're going to have to lose their legs or something.

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MORIA]
Players
1,953 posts
25,221 battles
2 minutes ago, Sir_Sinksalot said:

That smacks of something a doctor would say when they're informing a person they're going to have lose their legs or something.

"You gonna lose a leg and an eye, but hey, you'll make a killer pirate on Halloween"

  • Funny 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DC_DK]
Players
351 posts
7 minutes ago, quickr said:

"You gonna lose a leg and an eye, but hey, you'll make a killer pirate on Halloween"

Exactly!!  That is also how i read the excuses!!! :cap_like:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,510 posts
8,242 battles
49 minutes ago, WildWind84 said:

Better not say what I think about this update or I will get very long ban. I guess if I stay, that will be in mode WITHOUT subs and also just right now start again regrind of dd line. Didn't plan to regrind, but obviously I will need Slava if I deside to stay... RIP my fun and great sec. bbs :Smile_sad:

 

Well, you do inadvertently raise the very valid question of what's the point in WG devs sending out these meme-sub surveys when the vast majority of feedback is undoubtedly going to be a massively negative and over-dramatized response which doesn't actually fairly reflect a players encounters with and against subs, which WG devs will ultimately ignore and drive on with anyway. 

 

It's kinda like asking "Now, we've inserted an unusually large variety of garden gnome in your backside, please let us know your experience with that" and then they take that feedback and change the color of the gnomes hat in the next patch "There, we've taken your feedback and made the necessary improvements" 

  • Cool 5
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NLD2]
Players
226 posts
21,307 battles

I am very sad to see this game moving to some carnival type. The way this goes has nothing left from the WOWS I installed 7 years ago. In my clan a lot of players go to other games, since they do not like the game anymore.

 

The mere fact that you are merging servers all over the world shows that a lot of players elsewhere have the same experience.

 

Very sorry to see this game going down the drain.

 

 

  • Cool 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VL-NL]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
165 posts
29,501 battles

Great more subs ruining the gameplay.

Subs are good idea in a seperate game mode. Thoose who want to play them feel free without harnassing the whole community .... Again

The guys that say history is repeating itself ? Well WG fits that uniform real good. It succeeds giving the player base 1 dissapointment after another.

Gues PR manager got his diplome from vlad himself.

Sink yourself

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RO-GF]
Players
218 posts

maybe you eliminated the small errors from the scenarios... but the big errors of equalizing the game in operations, no... it doesn't take into account that: 2 players play with level 6, 3 with level 7 and 2 with level 8... the game is rated full  level 8..regardless of the levels of ships present in the game..this is the biggest error

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RO-GF]
Players
218 posts

errors, errors, errors.. if the planes of the level 8 aircraft carriers were shot down in the second world war, how do you stay without them in wows and never get to launch even a torpedo.. of course aviation is no longer of any interest to mankind..  that's why I think the level 8 cv.. is a joke .. a stupidity or an error

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RO-GF]
Players
218 posts

I don't know if anyone has noticed what incredible hp bots have from operations.. as well as superguns, dispersion sigma 3 and 80% fire on HE.. example: fuso from 57 thousand hp to 70 thousand hp, yamato from 97 thousand hp to  130 thousand hp, aoba from 29 thousand hp to 40 thousand hp..and the guns do a lot of damage, which in the reality of the game are much lower..that's why the operations became difficult to complete

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×