Remove Submarines

[El2aZeR]

26 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

You said that you provided some proof or answers but the reality don't show that. Go and see how you and your league could not provide any answer to plenty of things.

 

Oh, the irony!

[ghostbuster_]

 

1 hour ago, Fastmotion said:

I asked you very clearly to explain how those images are not spam

2 hours ago, ghostbuster_ said:

I mean I kinda understand tho. You should have thought after you saw the picture, that it was directed at you. Its a good sign. You are starting to get the image you have been drawing here on forum.

these pictures supposed to tell you something. you dont get it. I wrote it to you as seen above. you didnt get it either. I would directly translate these to you but I dont think its worth doing. 

[Fastmotion]

10 minutes ago, Cammo1962 said:

1: I dont admitt to anything that is not wrong you failred again.

2: Cant admitt you anything that is a false claim from yourside but we are realists while you live in a pretend world.

You had 2 options:

 

1) admit that any upper random spam images defines all your leagues arguments to be wrong.

2) admit that your league is inadequate because spam images are inadequate.

 

How can you not admit the point 1 if you said that an image can say thousands of words and things? It is a fact that your league posts the images that say thousands of words andthose 1000 prove that all your league's arguments are wrong and you have lost the argumentation. If you now change your mind and say that you don't approve the spam images then you have to choose the point 2) admit that your league is inadequate because spam images are inadequate.

 

It is a very clear situation here: if you approve spam images then you have lost all argumentation because that is what a thousand word image do. And if you don't approve spam then you admit that the above spam proves to othat you have lost the argumentation because you just admitted that you don't have adequate skills and spamming is not adequate.

[Fastmotion]

2 minutes ago, ghostbuster_ said:

 

these pictures supposed to tell you something. you dont get it. I wrote it to you as seen above. you didnt get it either. I would directly translate these to you but I dont think its worth doing. 

You say that spam images should suppouse to tell something. But nobody can explain what they should tell. People above said that those images should tell with 1000 words things and i nthat case they tell that all your league's arguments are wrong. Where isa proof that the images should tell something different?

[ghostbuster_]

1 minute ago, Fastmotion said:

You say that spam images should suppouse to tell something. But nobody can explain what they should tell.

again.

6 minutes ago, ghostbuster_ said:

 

these pictures supposed to tell you something. you dont get it. I wrote it to you as seen above. you didnt get it either. I would directly translate these to you but I dont think its worth doing. 

1 minute ago, Fastmotion said:

People above said that those images should tell with 1000 words things and i nthat case they tell that all your league's arguments are wrong. Where isa proof that the images should tell something different?

whats you mother tongue? maybe you understand if we write in your mother tongue... because in english, it looks really hopeless. 

[anonym_cwVecOS6ecVy]

Can you return to the thread topic finally please and solve your personal hustle privately? I am tired of this off topic derailing.

[Cammo1962]

2 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

You had 2 options:

 

1) admit that any upper random spam images defines all your leagues arguments to be wrong.

2) admit that your league is inadequate because spam images are inadequate.

 

How can you not admit the point 1 if you said that an image can say thousands of words and things? It is a fact that your league posts the images that say thousands of words andthose 1000 prove that all your league's arguments are wrong and you have lost the argumentation. If you now change your mind and say that you don't approve the spam images then you have to choose the point 2) admit that your league is inadequate because spam images are inadequate.

 

It is a very clear situation here: if you approve spam images then you have lost all argumentation because that is what a thousand word image do. And if you don't approve spam then you admit that the above spam proves to othat you have lost the argumentation because you just admitted that you don't have adequate skills and spamming is not adequate.

You have 2 options:

 

1: Admitt that you dont understand the game

2: Admitt that you dont even understand what we are talking about.

 

It is a very clear situation here: if you dont approve images then you have lost all argumentation because that is what a thousand word image do. You have lost the argumentation because you just admitted that you don't have adequate skills.

[ghostbuster_]

1 minute ago, Von_Pruss said:

 I am tired of this off topic derailing.

there is an easy solution. see the X mark on the top right corner? click it. = problem solved. 

[Cammo1962]

1 minute ago, ghostbuster_ said:

again.

whats you mother tongue? maybe you understand if we write in your mother tongue... because in english, it looks really hopeless. 

Hey hey dont mix his mothers tongue into this she has nothing to do with that 

 

[ghostbuster_]

Just now, Cammo1962 said:

Hey hey dont mix his mothers tongue into this she has nothing to do with that 

 

for the records, it wasnt me. you pulled this to some other direction 

[anonym_cwVecOS6ecVy]

3 minutes ago, ghostbuster_ said:

there is an easy solution. see the X mark on the top right corner? click it. = problem solved. 

How about following the rules simply? There is a forum rule. If you want to discuss general topics on behaviour and argumentation schemes, move on to the respective sections or private messages please. This goes on for several pages now and it is all about everything but subs.

[Fastmotion]

Just now, Cammo1962 said:

You have 2 options:

 

1: Admitt that you dont understand the game

2: Admitt that you dont even understand what we are talking about.

 

It is a very clear situation here: if you dont approve images then you have lost all argumentation because that is what a thousand word image do. You have lost the argumentation because you just admitted that you don't have adequate skills.

 So you again agreed with my proofs because you didn't provide anything against them. I explained clearly that your spam images with 1000 interpretations prove that your league has lost the argumentation. You had nothing vlaid to say against it. So, we have clearly proved that your leage lost here and there is no value if you deny it.

 

You changed a topic to ask me a question. Well, i said that you must qualify to ask questions from me but we proved that you failed the qualification round. You can pick any above spam images as an answer from upwards.

 

And i already answered adequately for question 1 and many others above.

 

So, let's repeat:

 

1. we proved that your league is wrong and there is no point to deny it.

2. try to pass qualification round and find a guru and a forum to go through the arguments. If you don't pass the qualification then the argumentation ends by any random spam image.

 

[SolanumTuberosumRex]

33 minutes ago, Cammo1962 said:

OMG i am so so so afraid now 

Yeah 'cause no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!

 

[ghostbuster_]

Just now, Von_Pruss said:

How about following the rules simply? There is a forum rule. If you want to discuss general topics on behaviour and argumentation schemes, move on to the respective secrions or private messages please. This goes on for several pages now and it is all about everyhing but subs.

well it has been about subs. should we repeat ourselfs like that one guy? 

I didnt notice that you are a mod or stuff. or do you consider applying for the position? I also didnt notice that you were forced to stay here. like I said, simple, if you are getting annoyed or tired like you said, leave the topic. easy. 

[Shirakami_Kon]

7 minutes ago, Von_Pruss said:

How about following the rules simply? There is a forum rule. If you want to discuss general topics on behaviour and argumentation schemes, move on to the respective sections or private messages please. This goes on for several pages now and it is all about everything but subs.

The thing with this is that you'd also expect the forum to have moderators to control and enforce these rules, not to have us to call out these things, and yet here we are. @SkipperCH what may be your opinion on this?

[SV_Kompresor]

19 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

1. we proved that your league is wrong and there is no point to deny it.

Deciding something on your own does not make it true. You've made many claims about subs and CVs that were objectively false while claiming you've won something.

 

19 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

2. try to pass qualification round and find a guru and a forum to go through the arguments. If you don't pass the qualification then the argumentation ends by any random spam image.

The images are usually there to convey one's emotion, not to reinforce a point. You're more than welcome to translate them to text and write it down somewhere if it makes you feel better about it.

[NewHorizons_1]

25 minutes ago, Shirakami_Kon said:

SkipperCH what may be your opinion on this?

Probably something along the lines of

 

 

[Mad_Dog_Dante]

2 hours ago, Fastmotion said:

WG, me, science, Sub players, court, world, etc, they all agree that such spam images equals the loss in the argumentation.

Well, that escalated quickly.

 

I'm expecting a call on the gods or the universe next to assist in the crusade against the league of 1000 interpretations wielding the sword of 20 arguments. 

 

Spoiler

 

A message from our sponsor

Spoiler

Spoiler

I know. I'm a heretic. 

 

 

 

[Fastmotion]

30 minutes ago, SV_Kompresor said:

Deciding something on your own does not make it true. You've made many claims about subs and CVs that were objectively false while claiming you've won something.

 

The images are usually there to convey one's emotion, not to reinforce a point. You're more than welcome to translate them to text and write it down somewhere if it makes you feel better about it.

I didn't decide anything by me own. You and all of your league had a chance to respond adequately but you failed to do it. That fact doesn't require me to conclude that you failed in the argumentation. I repeat the earlier example: Your hands are bloody and you are asked what did you do in the victims house yesterday as the security cameras show you in there. You don't answer anything or you answer that "the day is sunny" or "i wasn't in the victims house"- all those answers arenot valid and very likely you will be put into prison. The same is here that your league failed to give valid answers to questions where you can clearly conclude that your league is wrong. There is no need that the whole world would vote if the criminal was guilty. Therefore it does not matter who concludes things from your inadequate respondings. All the conclusions are right and obvious.

 

If you want to say that you won the argumentation here then you must not fail to answer the opponent's questions. But you all failed in that matter and failed to even answer a simple spam question adequately. I represented ca 20 questions and arguments and you failed them all. Did you answered adequately that the brothers example above shows some kind of valid stats and can you say what it shows? No, your league didn't answer to that and  to anything else adequately. If i asked that do you think that Subs are OPand can you explain how OP they are then the league was again silent or provided contradicted opinions. If one asks what do you mean that all hate subs then you becaome silent. and so on. That all concludes that the loosing party failed in their argumentation because they couldn't answer things.

 

You are giving an another definition about spam images which contradicts other versions from your league. Go and find out who of you is right. Until then you are inadequate and failed the warmup round. By your definition spam images do something usually but not always. Such a misleading definition sounds like the definition that images give 1000 ways to interpret or the other definition that images prove that someone is wrong. Well if there are no single clear understanding what an image does then your image is inadequate or can be interpreted as your loss.

 

So, you don't seem to be adequate with the images opinion and contradicts with your league opinion. Such thing proves that you are not ready for any argumentation.

 

[Cammo1962]

41 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

 So you again agreed with my proofs because you didn't provide anything against them. I explained clearly that your spam images with 1000 interpretations prove that your league has lost the argumentation. You had nothing vlaid to say against it. So, we have clearly proved that your leage lost here and there is no value if you deny it.

 

You changed a topic to ask me a question. Well, i said that you must qualify to ask questions from me but we proved that you failed the qualification round. You can pick any above spam images as an answer from upwards.

 

And i already answered adequately for question 1 and many others above.

 

So, let's repeat:

 

1. we proved that your league is wrong and there is no point to deny it.

2. try to pass qualification round and find a guru and a forum to go through the arguments. If you don't pass the qualification then the argumentation ends by any random spam image.

 

No i did not and will never agree with yon because you are so diluted and absend from this world.

 

1: No yo did not you failed again 

2: Sorry fell asleep while trying to read number 2 

[SV_Kompresor]

2 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

I didn't decide anything by me own. You and all of your league had a chance to respond adequately but you failed to do it.

I beg to differ. There were many and I mean many well argumented responses to you. At least at the start of the thread when you were still taken seriously.

 

3 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

I repeat the earlier example: Your hands are bloody and you are asked what did you do in the victims house yesterday as the security cameras show you in there. You don't answer anything or you answer that "the day is sunny" or "i wasn't in the victims house"- all those answers arenot valid and very likely you will be put into prison.

I genuinely have no idea what you even said here or what it has to do with the main topic, so I'm going to pretend it's not here.

 

4 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

The same is here that your league failed to give valid answers to questions where you can clearly conclude that your league is wrong.

Em no. The original answers were clear and reasonable. You on the other hand started moving away from the topic while failing to understand what the responses were saying in the first place. All you have to do to see that is read the first 2 or 3 pages.

 

5 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

f you want to say that you won the argumentation here then you must not fail to answer the opponent's questions. But you all failed in that matter and failed to even answer a simple spam question adequately.

I very much doubt that, but okay, I'll bite. Ask me those questions and I'll attempt to answer them as honestly and truthfully as I can. (you didn't ask me anything valid before, maybe by "you" you meant someone else.

 

6 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

You are giving an another definition about spam images which contradicts other versions from your league. Go and find out who of you is right. Until then you are inadequate and failed the warmup round. By your definition spam images do something usually but not always. Such a misleading definition sounds like the definition that images give 1000 ways to interpret or the other definition that images prove that someone is wrong. Well if there are no single clear understanding what an image does then your image is inadequate or can be interpreted as your loss.

If you can't figure out what an image represents, that's your problem. Not anyone else's. Alternatively feel free to ignore the images altogether.

 

7 minutes ago, Fastmotion said:

So, you don't seem to be adequate with the images opinion and contradicts with your league opinion. Such thing proves that you are not ready for any argumentation.

Try me.

[Fastmotion]

5 minutes ago, Cammo1962 said:

No i did not and will never agree with yon because you are so diluted and absend from this world.

 

1: No yo did not you failed again 

2: Sorry fell asleep while trying to read number 2 

1. Yes, i did prove everything.

2. Number 2 says that your definition of a spam image tell that your league lost argumentation here.

 

If you deny everything then sooner or later you will be in the corner like with the warmup spam question and loose.

[Fastmotion]

1 minute ago, SV_Kompresor said:

I beg to differ. There were many and I mean many well argumented responses to you. At least at the start of the thread when you were still taken seriously.

 

I genuinely have no idea what you even said here or what it has to do with the main topic, so I'm going to pretend it's not here.

 

Em no. The original answers were clear and reasonable. You on the other hand started moving away from the topic while failing to understand what the responses were saying in the first place. All you have to do to see that is read the first 2 or 3 pages.

 

I very much doubt that, but okay, I'll bite. Ask me those questions and I'll attempt to answer them as honestly and truthfully as I can. (you didn't ask me anything valid before, maybe by "you" you meant someone else.

 

If you can't figure out what an image represents, that's your problem. Not anyone else's. Alternatively feel free to ignore the images altogether.

 

Try me.

 

You say that i got many responses but i proved that i didnt get valid responses and your league failed with even the warmup question and and the argument 1 so we didn't proceed.

You don't qualify and therefore there is no point to explain to you and most of the answers are already given above.

[Cammo1962]

Just now, Fastmotion said:

1. Yes, i did.

2. Number 2 says that your definition of a spam image tell that your league lost argumentation here.

Wauw thats a biiiig step you agree to that you failed and number 2 it clearly says that i fell asleep because it was so boring to read so you lost there again 

[Sunleader]

1 hour ago, Fastmotion said:

So, you avoid answering how such spam images are useful and you don't answer if it is appropriate to call them spam or not. That proves that you don't pass the warmup exam.

 

What you try to say here is that if someone posts a random picture then they disagree with me. Your opinion is wrong because spam pictures have different content and there is no database that defines what all the different images mean. Even if there were a definition for some images then it is impossible to know how different people could interpret such images. One person thinks that a spam image with an apple means that person agrees with you the other thinks that the apple symbolizes something else. That proves that your definition of the spam images is wrong if you say that images mean "Don't agree". Spam images sometimes express random emotions or make just jokes and are irrelevant and not understandable. They don't have to mean "i disagree". So, we proved that you cannot explain what it the meaning of the spam images. People don't understand such images and therefore they are irrelevant in argumentations. If you use spam in argumentation then you have lost the argumentation.

 

 

 

I dont need to give an Answer :)

You See. Arguments are not about convincing the other Person you are Arguing with.

Trying to Convince you of something is a Waste of time. Because you dont look for Information or Arguments. You look for Confirmation of your own Opinion.

As such anything that does not Confirm your Opinion will be Discarded by you anyways. ;)

 

Arguments are about Convincing the People watching the Argument between two People.

And here is why the Image is Perfectly fine.

Because guess what. Vast Majority of us knows perfectly well that CVs are completely Unbalanced Trash which is horribly Implemented in the Game right now and does not fit into the Games Systems at all.

Thats common knowledge by now.

As such there simply is no need for me to bother having an Argument with you about it :)

 

 

 

But thats not really Relevant in the First Place is it ?

Because lets face it. You are not Providing any Arguments for that Topic to begin with.

 

You See.

For at least 4 Pages of this Topic now.

You have been Desperately avoiding the Topic of  Submarines.

 

Instead constantly clinging to whatever else you could to somehow Say something about that.

Including but being limited to:

Any other Topic including CVs,

Personal Attacks on People to Discredit them,

Argumentation Rules and/or etiquette,

And Accusations of Bias, Stupidness or avoidance :)

 

I have been Watching this Topic for some Pages now.

And so far I have not Seen you Say ANYTHING at all about the Topic of Submarines :)

 

 

 

Dont you think its time you stop whining about others and throwing strawmans in every direction and start coming back to the Topic ?

While its hilarious seeing you Spam the Forum with your excuses while pretending that others are not providing proper arguments.

Its also getting someone tiring that you just keep running away into whatever little straw you can find :)