Schnellboot S-100

[Vbeest]

11 hours ago, Shirakami_Kon said:

No. After submarines I don't want to see any more crap added to the game with some BS to make them work, thank you.

 

OP was asking whether we will have it, not if we want to have it.

 

Besides, it's not up to us to decide but the guys that spend thousands in premium store (lol, just saw a thread on Maya, short summary: "terrible ship" but "must buy" in the second sentence. Yes, you will have dragons here at some point).

[ghostbuster_]

12 hours ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

Do you think we would ever get one of these in WoWs and would you want one?.

 

did you finally figure out what passive gameplay means? 

 

To the question: if these things are gonna carry s ton of dept charges to one shot subs, im all for it. Give them 2 km detection and speed boost which boots their speed up to 70 knots.  

 

Btw. Rip DDs ofc

[The_Angry_Admiral]

What I find funny is the people thinking we aren't going to get anything else in this game and after the abomination of subs, Super CV's, and Super ships that anything mentioned is just far worse. 

 

This game has already been nuked to death so you really couldn't make it any worse. 

[Bland_42]

Not so sure about this one... BUT it could be a good thing if they specialized those S-Boot (and similiar for other nations) to be sub hunters.

Because they have so low draft that colud be immune from torps.

 

So they could give them: very low life (5-6k hp), around 50+ kn, 250 m turning circle with 1.5 seconds of rudder time, 4.5 km of base detection range from sea, 2 fast but low damage torpedos, 2 very fast but low range 47-57 mm guns (eventually some 20 mm AA), and... a lot (for the size) of depth charges.

 

Could be crazy to hunt subs with this, I think.

[Flaky26]

Před 2 hodinami The_Angry_Admiral řekl/a:

Max speed 50 knots but a very good turning circle because the boat itself is your torp launcher so in order to aim you need to move the boat quickly. 

I´m not sure if average player could handle such vessel. Lot of players struggle in CVs (and they are not that difficult to play) and even in submarines (they are even asier).

 

Před 37 minutami The_Angry_Admiral řekl/a:

This game has already been nuked to death so you really couldn't make it any worse. 

You underestimate WG capabilities. 

[The_Angry_Admiral]

3 minutes ago, Flaky26 said:

 

You underestimate WG capabilities. 

If you got any worse you would be intentionally trying to destroy the game with lasers, nukes, and magic. 

[MarChil]

Sure, because the strong point of WG is adding new classes to the game that are fun, engaging and balanced. I mean, what could go wrong? It's not that just about anything not visual related in the last year is an epic failure of biblical proportions.

[lovelacebeer]

12 minutes ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

If you got any worse you would be intentionally trying to destroy the game with lasers, nukes, and magic. 

Considering WG I wouldn’t put it past them to plan to add nukes and lasers by 2023, wizards, elves and dragons for 2024. 

[SV_Kompresor]

2 hours ago, WalkingDutchman said:

Why is that? You think there's something worse than CV's? If you're thinking of saying super CV's, I'll give you that one but other than that they're still the worst thing for the game. Planehater first, subhater second.

I consider subs to be far worse than CVs yes.

[The_Angry_Admiral]

53 minutes ago, MarChil said:

Sure, because the strong point of WG is adding new classes to the game that are fun, engaging and balanced. I mean, what could go wrong? It's not that just about anything not visual related in the last year is an epic failure of biblical proportions.

So what you think they aren't going to add anymore content to the game?

[MarChil]

38 minutes ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

So what you think they aren't going to add anymore content to the game?

Oh, they sure will. Doesn't mean that it's gonna be a suces. Just like subs, CV's and just about anything they layed their hands on the past 2 years, it gonna fail because they are clueless. They don't seem to get that it's the basics that are getting more broken by the patch and adding things makes it worse. 

[BrusilovX]

3 hours ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

This game has already been nuked to death so you really couldn't make it any worse. 

You're suggesting things that could make it worse.  But I guess that is lost on you.

[The_Angry_Admiral]

20 minutes ago, BrusilovX said:

You're suggesting things that could make it worse.  But I guess that is lost on you.

I guess what's lost on you is the fact you have 0 proof to back you up. 

 

What sly remark you got to come back with?

[BrusilovX]

3 minutes ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

I guess what's lost on you is the fact you have 0 proof to back you up. 

A bit like most things you post - nothing to back it up apart from desire for attention.  You kept on going on about 'passive play' but took ages to define what that was.

 

As others have already posted - these boats were in an Operation that from WG's news is coming back.

[Cammo1962]

14 hours ago, WalkingDutchman said:

Fixed your list for you.

No no you forgot one class aka subs they rank up beside CVs @WalkingDutchman  

[The_Angry_Admiral]

1 minute ago, BrusilovX said:

A bit like most things you post - nothing to back it up apart from desire for attention.  You kept on going on about 'passive play' but took ages to define what that was.

Attention?? WTF cares about attention when I get all I need from my wife.

 

Sorry mate but your attempts at coming off as superior in some way are failing badly. Maybe you should have a rethink of yourself and maybe I will bless you with my attention when you actually formulate something that isn't snark. 

[Shirakami_Kon]

5 hours ago, Vbeest said:

 

OP was asking whether we will have it, not if we want to have it.

It's kinda both. If we'll have them and if we would want one, but you're right I focused mostly on the second part.

 

5 hours ago, Vbeest said:

Besides, it's not up to us to decide but the guys that spend thousands in premium store (lol, just saw a thread on Maya, short summary: "terrible ship" but "must buy" in the second sentence. Yes, you will have dragons here at some point).

As for if we'll get these things in here I agree with you here completely. Best you can do is hope it doesn't cross their minds as something that would make them enough money for the effort.

[Shirakami_Kon]

4 hours ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

If you got any worse you would be intentionally trying to destroy the game with lasers, nukes, and magic. 

You seem to still think that's out of the lenghts they'd go if it makes them money.

[Shirakami_Kon]

3 hours ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

So what you think they aren't going to add anymore content to the game?

I don't think so, no. I would hope so though. For the foreseeable future this game doesn't need any more content, but get the current one fixed, and that seems out of their capability already.

[The_Angry_Admiral]

13 minutes ago, Shirakami_Kon said:

I don't think so, no. I would hope so though. For the foreseeable future this game doesn't need any more content, but get the current one fixed, and that seems out of their capability already.

Well I've been saying for years about all of Wargaming's products they should actually just fix the basics before bringing in new stuff but sure they just continue to pile on the next thing so it's screaming in a wind tunnel. 

[The_Angry_Admiral]

17 minutes ago, Shirakami_Kon said:

You seem to still think that's out of the lenghts they'd go if it makes them money.

But they will is the thing so might as well push for something that people may actually like. 

[Shirakami_Kon]

11 minutes ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

But they will is the thing so might as well push for something that people may actually like. 

Oh, and there's people that love submarines, don't worry. But that makes them a prime example of just dumping everything people may like into the game not being good for the game.

[The_Angry_Admiral]

21 minutes ago, Shirakami_Kon said:

Oh, and there's people that love submarines, don't worry. But that makes them a prime example of just dumping everything people may like into the game not being good for the game.

Sure they might as well shut up shop then. 

[Hopeless_Guppy]

18 hours ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

Do you think we would ever get one of these in WoWs and would you want one?.

 

I always loved the look of them, but adding these, would that not be like the EBR effect in WoT's?

[anonym_cwVecOS6ecVy]

5 minutes ago, Inappropriate_noob said:

I always loved the look of them, but adding these, would that not be like the EBR effect in WoT's?

EBRs can turn on a dime without a lot of speed loss, they can suck up enormous amounts of damage and bounce even the largest calber rounds a lot of times.