Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Steel1nvader

Brawls are complete FAIL!!

69 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[P-W-C]
Beta Tester
117 posts
11,060 battles
14 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

I suggest to not enter them alone.

This doesnt  change the thing, it is something could happen in alpha version of the game, but not now, this is shame. i cant comprehend how this is even possible.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
4 minutes ago, Steel1nvader said:

This doesnt  change the thing, it is something could happen in alpha version of the game, but not now, this is shame. i cant comprehend how this is even possible.

It changes a lot when you select the right teammates.

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,717 posts
6,192 battles

I don't see the point of this brawl.
Your screenshot essentially shows a strong CB team against the usual random team.
Can't see this being fun, regardless of which team you're on.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RONIN]
Players
403 posts
16,501 battles

It's not only the skill balance of full clan Divs against total random players, but why the hell did WG suddenly drop the no more of 1 same ship rule!? it's ridiculous, we had that for multiple clan seaons and now suddenly it's removed? making using certain ships even more useless than before. A clan buddy of mine played against a 6 player TORAZ Division with 3 other guys and 4 of them used the Sherman. So I guess everyone will also run multiple Stalingrads (since Petro was banned), multiple Ragnars, Smalands, Somers, Ohios, etc. I'm not even going to try these failed brawls. Why remove a rule that was very useful before, in fact it should be made even more strict imo. and use a max number of radar per team, the 5 out of 7 ships META at Clan Battles Seasons is stupid too.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMM]
[BBMM]
Players
8,818 posts
17,199 battles
4 minutes ago, Mrs_Ragdoll said:

a 6 player TORAZ Division with 3 other guys and 4 of them used the Sherman.

How many CVs and subs can we use? :Smile_trollface:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VIBES]
Players
3,717 posts
39,413 battles

Honestly, the MM should've just put those divs on opposing teams. It's not rocket science.


That screenshot tells the story of basically a bullying session :Smile_sceptic:

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CUP2D]
Players
79 posts
2,789 battles

It's an absolute dumpster fire of a Brawl. Just did 3 brawls in a row, all three complete div's against a bunch of randoms. WG should have a short, but hard look at the MM...

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VIBES]
Players
3,717 posts
39,413 battles
48 minutes ago, Mrs_Ragdoll said:

It's not only the skill balance of full clan Divs against total random players, but why the hell did WG suddenly drop the no more of 1 same ship rule!? it's ridiculous, we had that for multiple clan seaons and now suddenly it's removed? making using certain ships even more useless than before. A clan buddy of mine played against a 6 player TORAZ Division with 3 other guys and 4 of them used the Sherman. So I guess everyone will also run multiple Stalingrads (since Petro was banned), multiple Ragnars, Smalands, Somers, Ohios, etc. I'm not even going to try these failed brawls. Why remove a rule that was very useful before, in fact it should be made even more strict imo. and use a max number of radar per team, the 5 out of 7 ships META at Clan Battles Seasons is stupid too.

 

There's a screenshot on Reddit of a Brawl team with:

  • Nakhimov
  • Kramlin
  • Kremlin
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Cool 1
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,381 posts
6,643 battles

I really don't understand WHY they even allowed divisions in this game mode, and especially full team divisions like i Ops and CBs.

This is nothing but a time waste.

 

My advice to you would be go farm some Steel in Ranked (if you are after that Coal reward). And there is another 3000 Coal for 17.5k base exp earned (combat mission).

And farm eggs for 200 eggs milestone for another 10k Coal, where you get 2x 10k Coal (sprint 1 + sprint 2) which is in total 20k Coal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
3 minutes ago, Hades_warrior said:

I really don't understand WHY they even allowed divisions in this game mode, and especially full team divisions like i Ops and CBs.

This is nothing but a time waste.

 

My advice to you would be go farm some Steel in Ranked (if you are after that Coal reward). And there is another 3000 Coal for 17.5k base exp earned (combat mission).

And farm eggs for 200 eggs milestone for another 10k Coal, where you get 2x 10k Coal (sprint 1 + sprint 2) which is in total 20k Coal.

The game mode is made for divisions...

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5 posts
13,276 battles

We actually did that too and many other fun stuff.

2 hours ago, tocqueville8 said:

 

There's a screenshot on Reddit of a Brawl team with:

  • Nakhimov
  • Kramlin
  • Kremlin
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VIBES]
Players
3,717 posts
39,413 battles
5 minutes ago, Pathfinder said:

We actually did that too and many other fun stuff.

2 hours ago, tocqueville8 said:

 

How is that "fun", honestly? :Smile_amazed:

 

If it had been 6 Colberts and 2 Schlieffens, sure, I could see that. But Kremlin+Petro sounds very...stationary, attrition warfare-y.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5 posts
13,276 battles

Just try it and no its not stationary. You just set up and start pushing as one team, really funny to see the reds falling apart.

3 minutes ago, tocqueville8 said:

 

How is that "fun", honestly? :Smile_amazed:

 

If it had been 6 Colberts and 2 Schlieffens, sure, I could see that. But Kremlin+Petro sounds very...stationary, attrition warfare-y.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CUPID]
Players
266 posts
12,721 battles

Hi all.

 

We did a couple of brawls this evening, just members of chat on a pro-strimmers channel. We literally just divved up and went for it. First match, not good, we didn't balance it right. 2nd and third, went well, we balanced and took the opposition down.

 

Teams against us were, in the main, clans (the whole scenario seemed very clan orientated) but our b'stard crew worked well together, held positions, caused x fires etc. Fun? Yes but felt like a clan battle scenario throughout.

 

Worth running as it is presently? No. Its already a mode in the game .

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,553 posts
1,028 battles
4 hours ago, tocqueville8 said:

 

There's a screenshot on Reddit of a Brawl team with:

  • Nakhimov
  • Kramlin
  • Kremlin
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk
  • Petropavlovsk

 

It's a good thing Russian ships aren't broken.

 

So glad I havent entered this pointless waste of time. Look how obsessed WG is with CVs: letting them in this mode which they are totally unsuited for. What kind of mind thinks that is "fun"? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PEZ]
Players
11,301 posts
39,586 battles

Wg dictates the climate by allowing large divisions and by making the prizes win only grindfest they sack their own mode for anybody wanting to play individually…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×