Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
CV_SUB_Report_Blacklist

Support carriers closed conceptual test

119 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
1,217 posts
13,126 battles

giphy.gif

 

I am really struggling with WG these days. Why can't we have a vanilla mode with only surface ships and leave the rest for the ones that really like this crap?

I  am happy to pay money for such a version!

WG are you listening?!!

  • Cool 14
  • Funny 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PEZ]
Players
11,301 posts
39,586 battles

So they add a cv sub-class with planes set to disable DCP

 

Griefer f* heaven now the 2xCVs and 2-3SSs can conplement each other…

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HALON]
Players
179 posts
14,867 battles

Interesting, but how do these ships gain experience or money if they don't do damage ?

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,045 posts
21,881 battles
7 minutes ago, conce69 said:

Interesting, but how do these ships gain experience or money if they don't do damage ?

  • Fire and flood damage done to a ship while under the effect of Stun bombs, regardless of which ship caused the status effect, will also count as damage done in the statistics of the Support carrier player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,656 battles

Okay, not going to reach for torches and pitchforks just yet; I'll wait and see what this really means in practice.

 

That said, stun? Because that particular mechanic is *so* popular in WOT...

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BURZA]
Players
514 posts
18,040 battles

If only Wargaming put equal effort into keeping existing game mechanics enjoyable, as they put into inventing new ones.... Ehhh....

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
76 posts
13,666 battles

Abandon all hope and ships too ... ...

 

constant disdain and stunning hate bombs dev team are dropping on player base is just stunning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PEZ]
Players
11,301 posts
39,586 battles

Ok I get the chaff and smoke part, what I would like to know WHO and ON WHAT PLATFORM asked for stun bombs… I am wating…

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Players
2,012 posts

The Devs won't be happy till they've put themselves out of a job with their Dopey Ideas, Just imagine a future employer looking at your CV ...Guy's ,, Your :etc_swear:d

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SPAST]
Players
67 posts
8,421 battles

Hmm if they keep CV slots in high tiers at one, I am happy that those could replace regular carriers. Sounds like an interesting concept. 

 

Only acceptable if they dont increase plane detection of DDs to 6km though... that would be really horrible.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,032 posts
19,168 battles

Oh look, all the whining about CVs not only brought you guys super CVs, now you even get a whole new tech tree line! It's working. Keep going guys.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LOKTR]
Players
381 posts
13,272 battles

"WG, support CVs that would be designed to counter strike CVs might not be a bad idea. It would feel more balanced for surface ships and would make playing CV more interesting."

"Understood. Here's a support CV that will further counter surface ships and play well in synergy with strike CVs."

 

Baffling.

  • Funny 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LADA]
[LADA]
Players
975 posts
10,423 battles

Took a long break at the beginning of the year - came back to look and see what sort of antics WG were up to..... I mean after subs, superships and everything else there is only so much hilarious self-sabotage that a single company can do.....

 

.....yep..... turns out there is....

 

 

Back to Warthunder (brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrt). 

 

 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTT]
Players
168 posts
18,273 battles

This hidden Playerbase that secretly really loves CV´s must be gigantic .......

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,656 battles
45 minutes ago, Yedwy said:

Ok I get the chaff and smoke part, what I would like to know WHO and ON WHAT PLATFORM asked for stun bombs…

Someone who'd just had an unhappy love affair, and didn't see why anyone else should have any fun...?

 

Given that adding the stun mechanic is obviously going to be as much fun as experimental bowel surgery, why not just have three flights of planes: one each of the new smoke and chaff types (which actually sound - to me - like a potentially useful addition), plus one of the existing 'attack' types so CVs still have something violent to do?

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×