Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Ocsimano18

Many have gone

66 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
3,476 posts
13,949 battles

Compared to the stats about one month ago, many players have gone. Eg. we had  12148 Massachusetts (black and non black) players a month ago vs 7023 now who had been playing in the last 28 days.

 

Player numbers are next to the ship’s name.

10th of February, EU server T8 stats:

515CA6CE-3DCA-4D48-8543-EFE7530273D5.jpeg

 

21st of March, EU server T8 stats:

A1327D1F-8B3A-4882-B4CF-2D61DD19240C.png

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,476 posts
13,949 battles
Just now, ColonelPete said:

That only says that the ship was played less than before....

It’s true for all ships. E.g. Enterprise down from 1483 to 940, Cossack down from 5032 to 3100, and so on.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MMI-C]
Players
149 posts
9,873 battles

I don't have a safe explanation, but I suspect a lot of players opted to play other game modes than randoms last month. I for one played dirigible derby and ranked only and avoided randoms like the plague.

  • Cool 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,368 posts
37,429 battles
14 minutes ago, Ocsimano18 said:

It’s true for all ships. E.g. Enterprise down from 1483 to 940, Cossack down from 5032 to 3100, and so on.

i hope it gets down to zero.

  • Cool 4
  • Funny 2
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,476 posts
13,949 battles
3 minutes ago, stefanorgano said:

I don't have a safe explanation, but I suspect a lot of players opted to play other game modes than randoms last month. I for one played dirigible derby and ranked only and avoided randoms like the plague.

DD was T10, these are T8 stats. Not likely that a T10 mode draws so many T8s away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OGHF2]
Players
4,054 posts
5,647 battles

well wotapi shows a downward trend for the last 3 months ... however I did not check if that's a seasonal thing or not ...

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,927 posts
13,486 battles

In many countries Covid regulations have been relaxed and/or dropped.

 

Result: MANY people can or have to go into work or can do other activities now for multiple days of the week, reducing playing time directly as well as indirectly.

 

Also, people might be playing other modes (would have loved to play Dirigible Derby more, couldn't because of incompatible grinds) or other ship classes. That said, people on NA are allegedly noticing short matches even during 'normal' playing times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,553 posts
1,028 battles

I know many have gone. I switched clans on NA, because my own clan suffered a drop after subs hit Randoms the first time. Now I have lost both my longtime Randoms div mates in my old clan, 1 to the rework, 1 to subs. Lost a slew of other people I played with to the rework, and another round of drops now.

The devs are doing their best to kill WOWs. It's a testimony to how good the core game used to be that the game is still viable after all this time despite the run of stupid decisions.

 

 

  • Cool 10
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,532 posts
29,238 battles

It has absolutely nothing to do with current world affairs. Wargaming is definitely not owned by a complicit oligarch and none of these players left in protest of WG continuing to make tons of money in Russia.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-corporations-that-have-pulled-out/

Let alone over absurd security concerns. The mere insinuation is deplorable!

https://techcrunch.com/2022/03/15/germany-kaspersky-risk-invasion/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAEX3Cull5q0BK2PZZSnvo80OEpfIs4b-guQmICIcfutEClOT5q7Sbkmy2HMiGdhoe6S9kyRlseu47N_icc7DrExTLny9okY4HIGxGUAnvDqBHWHR0KyqlSvuHdRa1ADNaTRu7miFyC3LCW34KRQUMXhCgoD8iq7EYZfG6J5Nt0A5

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
231 posts
11,220 battles
9 hours ago, ColonelPete said:

That only says that the ship was played less than before....

I checked the player numbers on the EU server on Saturday evening: 20K.

 

As far as I remember, the top number was around 36K - many years back.

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
1 minute ago, Adm_Lindemann said:

I checked the player numbers on the EU server on Saturday evening: 20K.

 

As far as I remember, the top number was around 36K - many years back.

Singular points in time do not say much.

We also had 20k players sometimes many years back.

 

Fact is, that the game had more players during the past year than many years back.

  • Boring 3
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,146 posts
19,218 battles
10 hours ago, ColonelPete said:

That only says that the ship was played less than before....

You cannot deny that currently EU server numbers are lower by a factor of 20%-25%.... I haven't seen a day where the server is nearer 30,000 than 20,000 lately.

  • Cool 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
6 minutes ago, Migantium_Mashum said:

You cannot deny that currently EU server numbers are lower by a factor of 20%-25%.... I haven't seen a day where the server is nearer 30,000 than 20,000 lately.

Compared to what? Compared to the Christman Frenzy? As it happens every year since 2017?

  • Boring 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,476 posts
13,949 battles
5 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

Compared to what? Compared to the Christman Frenzy? As it happens every year since 2017?

Data is from 28 days back from 11th of February. The 14th of January is back to work/school time already.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,146 posts
19,218 battles
4 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

Compared to what? Compared to the Christman Frenzy? As it happens every year since 2017?

Steady on Colonel, you'll end up soiling your Pants, I meant that the EU server was nearer 30,000 than 20,000 whereas lately it's the other way around....

 

Oh and I have been here since 2016 too you know, you're not the only one, so I know the patterns.

 

 

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
Just now, Ocsimano18 said:

Data is from 28 days back from 11th of February. Back to work/school time already.

The event was still running.

  • Boring 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
Players
7,047 posts
32,322 battles

One look at the server stats shows clearly that EU is just having a normal fluctuation. Maybe a bit larger than normal, compared to last two years.

 

However one look at RU, and you just can't ignore the effect of current events. The first thing to go in an economic slump is the entertainment budget.

With the coming changes in Russia, we can almost bet as to when the RU server will collapse. The change in player numbers is too abrupt to ignore.

 

The problem with WoWS is that glorious Russian devs who can do no wrong and never make mistakes, don't listen to feedback and continue on their course.

A very Russian trait that elsewhere is causing massive issues and a hike in sunflower seed spread.

  • Cool 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
Just now, Migantium_Mashum said:

Steady on Colonel, you'll end up soiling your Pants, I meant that the EU server was nearer 30,000 than 20,000 whereas lately it's the other way around....

Once again, what times do you compare?

Singular comparisson do not say much. We had an 38k peak last December. The only time we had more players on the server was when the game launched in 2015.

  • Boring 2
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
231 posts
11,220 battles
28 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

Singular points in time do not say much.

We also had 20k players sometimes many years back.

 

Fact is, that the game had more players during the past year than many years back.

Yes, the numbers doesn't say anything - let's just get rid of them... :cap_win:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
Just now, Adm_Lindemann said:

Yes, the numbers doesn't say anything - let's just get rid of them... :cap_win:

If one is unable to make a structured comparission or establish context, then yes, some people are better without numbers.

  • Boring 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
231 posts
11,220 battles
4 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

If one is unable to make a structured comparission or establish context, then yes, some people are better without numbers.

The fact is that Ocsimano provided a context, so if you still don't believe to the numbers, then your rule applies to you...

 

You don't have to believe to any data someone else is providing, you can do it by yourself - maybe you will believe to your data.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×