Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
The_EURL_Guy

Submarines Are Again Lurking in the Depths of Our Seas for Testing Purposes

135 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[NOS]
Beta Tester
62 posts
13,525 battles

no thank you, didnt miss them at all , and everytime i looked at this debth charge button i felt sad knowing they would dare come back one day 

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AMOC]
Players
3,860 posts
46,764 battles
4 hours ago, YabbaCoe said:

You can try them in the Training Room:

In the training room can you pick sub bots, to add to the team lists, as well?

 

2 hours ago, undutchable80 said:

I know Dutch cruisers have regular airstrikes but to my knowledge they don't do dmg to Subs. 

Well, being pedantic, Dutch cruiser airstrikes can damage a sub ... when it's on the surface, but so can everyone else ... with gun fire.

But, yes, Dutch cruisers have no counter to a submerged sub.

Having said that, cruiser ASW airstrikes are such short range that the Dutch ones are not missing out on much.

Actually, it would be quite nice to give Dutch cruisers ASW airstrikes with the same range as their conventional ones.

That would then give the Dutch cruisers an actual role - ASW cruiser.

Something that, at the moment, is a job best performed by BBs.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[O-V]
Players
390 posts
16,087 battles

90% of the player base don't  give a fuc8 about your subs are you lot to thick to understand ?? PS ban away ..zero forks given 

  • Cool 6
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VIBES]
Players
3,717 posts
39,293 battles
2 hours ago, Astolfo_Is_My_Waifu said:

They didn't have ASW in reality.

 

I'm pretty sure my Colbert and D7P had a radar or two in reality... :Smile_sceptic:

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
73 posts
1,953 battles

Ahhh finally my favorite hunters are back :cap_rambo:

 

I'll be able to go back to playing my favorite style of play, that of "silent hunter" :cap_rambo:

 

Because yes, contrary to what one might believe looking at the forums, there are also people very happy with the addition of these little marine killers, me the first :cap_rambo:

  • Cool 3
  • Boring 3
  • Bad 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1 post
4,699 battles

Unlike most players here i think...i actually LIKE submarines and prefer playing with them in the game. Can it not be organised in such a way that those who want to play with submarines have access to certain games and not others and people can choose?

  • Cool 3
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
604 posts
15,920 battles
2 hours ago, asgardwarrior1 said:

Can it not be organised in such a way that those who want to play with submarines have access to certain games and not others and people can choose?

That is all I ask for. Hate subs in every way, and all I wanna is possibility that we can choose if we wish or we don't wish to play with them or against them. WG should put them in some new mode of game, not in random/ranked, but new mode with all ships and subs and who wish play - then go there.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
11 posts
15,512 battles

Absolute stupidity reintroducing subs, they are way overpowered and surface so rarely hitting them is a joke, depth charges do minimal damage and they are wat to fast. I swear to god i'm not spending a cent with WG until the arrogant idiots listen to players.

  • Cool 2
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
378 posts
5,259 battles
11 hours ago, Astolfo_Is_My_Waifu said:

They didn't have ASW in reality.

neither did some ships in the game exist in RL, thats never stopped WG from being creative... 

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,021 posts

You cannot blame the players but just like with super ships they are curious to try them. And just like that you have rather new unexperienced players or players who did not understand the basics of the game after 10.000 battles sailing along in the most powerful ships. But just like super ships incompetent subs mostly sink and do nothing else. And they make a dramatic long journey out of games that are already lost on the loading screen when the rest of the team is trying to win. All games with super ships and subs were such games yesterday. GG on allowing players immediate access to tier X and XI. This is like the dumbest idea ever WG and you are really motivated to repeat them over and over again. GG also on "collecting data" from such games to ruin the live servers even more.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AMOC]
Players
3,860 posts
46,764 battles
9 hours ago, tocqueville8 said:

I'm pretty sure my Colbert and D7P had a radar or two in reality... :Smile_sceptic:

Don't worry Colbert & D7P, you're not missing out on much as no one else's radar can detect a periscope .... like they could in real life. :Smile_sceptic:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NOFUN]
Players
125 posts
24,124 battles

Why do you keep trying to hammer that square peg into a round hole? 

Player base says they don't want subs, WG says they value our feedback and give us subs.

Why bother with the forums and feedback when you obviously don't care what we think?

 

 

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[4WARD]
Players
3 posts

Maybe it's time to boycott wg till until they understand, that we DO NOT WANT @#˘* subs. We really don't. If wg wants them, keep them in sub matches, but not in random. If they stay in random, ill DELETE the game. Many others will too...

Can't understand why wg likes to make its own playerbase angry.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1 post
872 battles

i don't get all the hate here...
played for like 8h today and had a great time playing subs.
not that easy to survive when you get hunted down but the issue is that nobody ever bothers to do that and then complains in chat about subs being crap..

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1
  • Boring 2
  • Bad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LAI]
Beta Tester
680 posts
3,140 battles
44 minutes ago, Hollendorfer said:

Maybe it's time to boycott wg till until they understand, that we DO NOT WANT @#˘* subs. We really don't. If wg wants them, keep them in sub matches, but not in random. If they stay in random, ill DELETE the game. Many others will too...

Can't understand why wg likes to make its own playerbase angry.

I wonder, who is that "we"? I want @#˘* subs, other (NOT EVERY!) players want them. Since this ship game really needs to break that WOT style meta (playing WOT is still an option for those who like it).

  • Boring 1
  • Bad 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,021 posts
2 hours ago, NewHorizons_1 said:

Don't worry Colbert & D7P, you're not missing out on much as no one else's radar can detect a periscope .... like they could in real life. :Smile_sceptic:

At least they can detect through hundred meters of mountains.

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LAI]
Beta Tester
680 posts
3,140 battles
20 hours ago, Von_Pruss said:

5B8B93B5-2456-415A-926A-6D6F1DBC0074.thumb.jpeg.77ff1c61420591bc2fb37e2c03eb30ac.jpeg

 

Hm, 73% of players are against subs, while 24% vote for them. More than one fifth of players is kinda big number (if we assume that such mini polls with attached comments "ban who vote yes" reliably reflect opinion of all players).

  • Cool 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[4WARD]
Players
3 posts

U dont get the point. Play your beloved subs in SUB matches, but keep random battles clean. And if wg prefers to favor the 1/5, so be it, with all the consequences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VPM]
Players
989 posts
20,595 battles
1 minute ago, NewHorizons_1 said:

I thought that was the other way around.

Yes, also possible. But the community doesn't want to hear anything from Subamrines in this case..

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
376 posts
1,378 battles

WARGAMING, WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO WAKE UP TO THE FACT THAT NOBODY WANTS SUBS IN THE GAME EXCEPT YOU.

 

I have enjoyed playing again since subs were removed.

 

But I will not play random battles with submarines in them, EVER.

I have not seen subs in Ranked battles, so at the moment I will play ranked only.

 

I have some premium account time left.

But once that is gone, I will not spend one more penny on your game.

Your continued pushing of subs into the games, proves beyond doubt that you do not give a monkeys t____ for your own player base.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Players
2,012 posts

Dear Weasely G, Stick Unwanted Special Submarine  Operations Right Up Your collective :etc_swear:s, No Money from me whilst those Unpolished Turds are infecting the game :Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×