Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
The_EURL_Guy

Important Message for the World of Warships Community

42 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[R7S]
Players
2,179 posts
12,297 battles

Players now need to confirm that they are 18 year old.

Wow, a 7 year old cant click that..,wait he can.

Amazing solution.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 6
  • Boring 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
186 posts
5 minutes ago, Wulf_Ace said:

Players now need to confirm that they are 18 year old.

Wow, a 7 year old cant click that..,wait he can.

Amazing solution.

Wait a 7 year old has access to the adults digital id too?  Ah well, could be playing outside and get hit by a car..  so yeah.. gambling away a fortune online does not sound to bad. 

Now,  is the parent complaining or the 7 year old. Can you clear us up ?  

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BODEM]
Players
1,235 posts
8,476 battles

Finally, some words on CVs!!!! Pleaaaaase, please, please take their tools down a notch, even if it's not "realistic". I'd love for the class not to be such a hateful one and to be able to have fun playing it while it being balanced to the other classes. 

  • Cool 1
  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[YEET]
Players
46 posts
10,554 battles

Thanks so much for the update!

 

Great work, still really enjoying this positive communication :cap_horn:

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[R7S]
Players
2,179 posts
12,297 battles
3 minutes ago, admiraldelorin said:

Wait a 7 year old has access to the adults digital id too?  Ah well, could be playing outside and get hit by a car..  so yeah.. gambling away a fortune online does not sound to bad. 

Now,  is the parent complaining or the 7 year old. Can you clear us up ?  

I guess your explanation cleared how old are you.

  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,441 battles
9 minutes ago, CruisingForMermaids said:

If you're in the listening mood, can we please have achievement flags back?

Thank you for your suggestion. It is still an open question to devs, to have some kind of rewards for achievements back. 

But unfortunately, currently there is no update on this question.

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VPM]
Players
989 posts
20,631 battles

Okay, the communication may have improved, but none of what was heard is being implemented.

Unfortunately, nothing really changes for the player base. Maybe you should put that on your change list.

  • Cool 2
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[FALX]
Players
487 posts

Regarding ships for resources, you should also tell us if ships at other tiers than T8 will come for doubloons or not. Doubloons is also a resource. I was excited for Verdi and Dalian because I thought they will be for RP/coal but now WG seems to go for T9 doubloons-only.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
192 posts
6,375 battles

The article listing the droprates is nice, but where is the info on supercontainers? Or you are not ready to publish their droprates yet?

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,441 battles
8 minutes ago, Cheeky_chappie said:

The article listing the droprates is nice, but where is the info on supercontainers? Or you are not ready to publish their droprates yet?

The page with drop changes is being updated and populated with other containers. There are still plenty of containers, that need to be revised, so their drop changes can be added to the list.

Currently we have no info on when Supercontainers will be listed there.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
392 posts
27,112 battles

From experience, super containers drop chances increases when you buy things for real money.

That info will be quite complicated to display :)


Best Regards

Me

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MORIA]
Players
1,953 posts
25,232 battles

edit Only when player population started to dwindle they suddenly started to listen.

All this "we have changed" is nothing but a PR trick.

  • Cool 3
  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Players
2,012 posts

To be honest any movement by Wargaming away from the :etc_swear:t Hole of a Business Model/Attitude that had come to dominate by last summer has to be better (I'm not saying good, just better) I know the :etc_swear:Marines will be back to screw things over WG won't be able to help themselves so we will wait for the Pain :Smile_facepalm:

  • Cool 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BWOLF]
Players
261 posts
47,364 battles

Improved communication ? Then why lie constantly about BOT "improvements" in co op ? This mode has become an utter joke for disabled players like me limited to co ops.

 

Oh and dont get me started on the BS 3DD rule - 90% of games with 4 DDs. Another WG lie. And yes i watch the timer for the 30sec limit - still a fail on your part.

 

Or the ridiculous mercy rule.

 

Oh and why early access and missions ? Lets give new players ships they cant play and get rid of finding that little star ship at low tiers - imagine missing out on Clemson !!

 

 

 

 

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-NSC-]
Players
373 posts
14,995 battles
2 hours ago, FukushuNL said:

Finally, some words on CVs!!!! Pleaaaaase, please, please take their tools down a notch, even if it's not "realistic". I'd love for the class not to be such a hateful one and to be able to have fun playing it while it being balanced to the other classes. 

Balanced.. they're nerfed compared to other classes (not to mention from what they were before).. Being a good CV player now is still a challenge if you want to support your team and do damage.

 

I love to hear people whine and moan about CV's being OP, but having scarce few games in them, if any at all. Then you check what class they play the most, and lo and behold.. BB player... Jeeze. I could somewhat have understood a DD player for moaning about a CV, but seriously, you need to change how you play a bit if there are CV's in the match... CV's are not OP, they're not the class with the most OP stats in ANY WAY. Here are some wows-numbers for you:

 

1. CV with the highest winrating is in place #9 for all Ships, and it's T6 Bearn... 

2. CV with the highest avg frags per match is Nakhimov at place #38.

3. CV with the highest avg exp pr match is also Nakhimov at place #16

4. Now, the biggest and most scary of all, is how often does a CV survive a match (kill per death ratio), there Enterprise is at #1, in fact of the top 10 places 8 are CVs..  So if you want to survive a match, play a CV, but it clearly doesn't make you relevant or the deciding factor in a match.

 

I can understand why Farazelleth got pissed of the change, because CV's were a CHALLENGE to play before the change, and were op as F!"#%. But with high skill came high rewards. Now it's anybody that can play them, but they're mostly made irrelevant due to super nerfed mechanics and damage.. That's not saying you can farm damage, but nowhere like the golden olden days where a CV player could remove any 1 ship from the game and made all DD's irrelevant, spot all torps.. wow.. stop complaining about CVs, please. Adapt or go home. 

 

-Fes

 

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 1
  • Boring 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LEGIO]
Players
147 posts
12,346 battles

I got positive of this message, in fact, alot.  Its in the right way they are heading!

 

Good work Wg! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RO-RN]
Players
27 posts
28,470 battles

I would like to see a new operation for tier 8. 

Why tier 8? Because the great matchmaking from ''random battle'' have a nice habit to make tier 8 (most of the games) bottom tier.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-NSC-]
Players
373 posts
14,995 battles
48 minutes ago, tsounts said:

How about this?

Of course he rather make a video instead of reporting it as a bug. Reporting it as a bug would assist us, this only assists him, in getting his toxic squad to subscribe more. The guy is not helping the game, he is helping himself. He's akin to the guy laughing and filming people slipping and falling on the ice, instead of helping them he rather post videos of them for his own personal gains. I LOATHE such people.

 

The bug itself, nasty and should be fixed asap, but as it's not a BB bug. It'll take a patch :-).

 

-Fes

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 4
  • Bad 4
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EMPOR]
Players
982 posts
1 hour ago, Fesvil said:

Of course he rather make a video instead of reporting it as a bug. Reporting it as a bug would assist us, this only assists him, in getting his toxic squad to subscribe more. The guy is not helping the game, he is helping himself. He's akin to the guy laughing and filming people slipping and falling on the ice, instead of helping them he rather post videos of them for his own personal gains. I LOATHE such people.

 

The bug itself, nasty and should be fixed asap, but as it's not a BB bug. It'll take a patch :-).

 

-Fes

The server having a fixed tick rate isn't a bug. It would be a bug only, if WG would specify a specific tick rate and the one on the server would differ from it. But i'm pretty sure it's exactly what WG wants it to be.

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
143 posts
40,729 battles

A good idea as nobody seems to be using Submarines is to build 2 per nation and let em buy em for use. I will if you build 2 Royal Navy submarines buy em both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[P-W-C]
Beta Tester
117 posts
11,035 battles

There is a mistake in your article. You have already made changes to Zao, Petro and Roosevelt. Please fix that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×