Roadmap for 2022

[Maximalni_Drak]

I must say, that I have nothing against CVs or subs. I even welcome them, as they were part of the real history. 

But the superships and now announced Super Race, where a ship is changing her parameters during the battle, are most probably over my acceptance line. This is unreal and if I want to play some phantasy game, there is plenty of them, they look well and are cheaper. I'd probably go to play some Mechs or similar. Please consider this. Already the phantasy camos are not acceptable for me. Continue this way and I am out.

[Panocek]

1 hour ago, affie said:

What is the point of the European tree when even smaller navies (Spain & Netherland) are getting their own nations?

Pan Eu tech tree had its point until spreadshiet said it would be more profitable to split nations as much as possible with upcoming Commander REEEwork, so players spend more on premium ships and Free Exp conversions for Captains

 

 

why my scam senses are tingling 

[FrankvC_Jr]

1 hora antes, affie dijo:

What is the point of the European tree when even smaller navies (Spain & Netherland) are getting their own nations?

 

When will Sweden get their own nation since the major part of European tech tree is made of Swedish mostly historical ships?!

While I agree with on the fact that European tree should be properly named Sweden, there are still 2 ships which are not from there. So unless they actually rework those, they will stick to panEuro.

 

 

Also, calling small navies both the Dutch and Spanish ones seems to be a misunderstanding. Sure they were not world leading navies, but they still got much more action than some others. 

[BanzaiPiluso]

So you will take all of our camos,make them irrelevant and make us buy new flags for economic and XP bonuses?

Thanks WG!

FFS.

[tsounts]

WG, are you serious? Have you been paying any sort of attention to any of the actual feedback your players are providing? (short answer: NOOOOOO)!

[Walter300]

„Signals and camouflages will serve as elements of the exterior and yield combat bonuses only.“

 

For a decade I've served WG as probably one of the fatter whales. It would be important to know what happens to the countless signals and camouflage that are deliberately kept in reserve. In my opinion, items that have already been purchased should not be touched, since real money was involved and it would be a fundamental breach of trust. Timely enlightenment is required!

 

PS: The communications team should learn to put themselves in the psyche of pathologically addicted collectors and hoarders. :|

[ARE_YOU_HUMAN]

2 minutes ago, Walter300 said:

„Signals and camouflages will serve as elements of the exterior and yield combat bonuses only.“

 

For a decade I've served WG as probably one of the fatter whales. It would be important to know what happens to the countless signals and camouflage that are deliberately kept in reserve. In my opinion, items that have already been purchased should not be touched, since real money was involved and it would be a fundamental breach of trust. Timely enlightenment is required!

Get ready for disappointment 

I think this is going to cause another drama.

[johncl]

Super Ships in the tech tree THATS BYE BYE FROM ME ......Pay 50£ for T9 Premium only to see the MM nerfed by 50%

 

Its hard enough to play things like the Lion / FDGs  against Shittyshima and Stalingrad's Or any other steal Tier 10.5 ship .But to pay 50£  for the pleasure then to bring in tier Tier 11 ...Well [edited]you to  

[_Houmer_]

2 hours ago, Spezieh said:

Economic stats go away from signals and camos. How about premium camos. I bought them for exactly these economic bonuses. 

 

Do not worry. I am pretty sure they will "compensate" their valuable and beloved players in an appropriate way. As they always do, no? 

 

Superships in tech tree, hm....  

I hope you are ready to give money back for T9 premiums that people bought just for one simple reason. Not to fight ships two tiers stronger. 

 

[Aragathor]

3 hours ago, hellhound666 said:

what amazed me is the clever scheduling of the eu stream - most of the people are working but lesta is streaming their stuff

and even more amazing is that while ru is ahead of eu in time zones their stream was after eu

How do you show your contempt to your customers while maintaining a polite lie that you care? You make sure those people cannot attend.

 

2 hours ago, affie said:

What is the point of the European tree when even smaller navies (Spain & Netherland) are getting their own nations?

 

When will Sweden get their own nation since the major part of European tech tree is made of Swedish mostly historical ships?!

So that they can deny Polish players their own line?

 

The economic changes will punish people who have paid cash, instead they will introduce "new" mechanics that can be bought. WG will keep moving the goalposts to the detriment of the community. Tha t is sure.

[Starkaddd]

And the operations?
They said they would put back ancient operations in 2022...

Not a word about this? Liar.com, like Trudeau?

Damn, I regret having bought containers lately with this hope in mind.
 

[Johnny_Moneto]

Vor 5 Stunden, Hakssor sagte:

What's gonna happen with the current expendable camos we have in inventory? Do we get the economic bonuses mirrored and separated? Or they're gonna lose their economic bonuses.

I would like to expand this question to economic flag signals (Zulu, India Bravo Terrathree).

 

I got so many flag signals and expendable camouflages with credit modifiers that I need to start using them now in case they will lose any value in summer.

[Hanse77SWE]

Feedback...right!

* Italian DDs: I have the Leone and I don't like the feel of her so if the rest of the line is the same then it won't be a joy for me.

* 2nd line of french cruisers? OK, I'll try it.

* Superships: Why!? I haven't been able to try them because every time I collect four tokens I get coal but the whole deal with a 11th tier is pointless to me. We don't need more ships, we need more things to do with the ships we got.

* Submarines: I'm against it. They don't fit the game but that doesn't matter since WG will do what they want no matter what we say.

* British battlecruisers: Fine by me.

* Changes to the economy: There's not enough info to draw any conclusions but I have a lot of questions. What happens to the thousands of cammos and flags that I already have? Will the grind be even longer? I feel that a slower grind early in the game would be better and to speed it up at the higher tiers. Waiting for the details.

 

I'll just wait and see.

[WascallyWabbit]

2022 roadmap, employ more knee bending hashtagging  simps, rip off the player base, ignore the playerbase, more CV's exactly what the player base wants, more rip offs, loot crates, more rip offs, sell foolish players tech tree ships, more rip offs, more CV's.....nft's more cv's and finally more loot crates, more ignoring what the players actually want, rip off's cash grabs and one last finally....more CV's.

 

So the same as every other year, just ramped up a notch or five.

[Dorian_Warwick]

Economy overhaul... Why do I have the feeling that PvE players will get the short end of the stick again...?

[Johnny_Moneto]

Vor 9 Stunden, Aragathor sagte:

How do you show your contempt to your customers while maintaining a polite lie that you care? You make sure those people cannot attend.

 

I didn't watch the stream live but later as a VOD. Now I am here to give feedback. I don't see anything wrong with what WG did in this respect.

[DeletedUser]

13 hours ago, neverbright said:

When i read economic changes, that should mean less money and xp for players. Like the captains xp rework, it will be a way to lengthen the grind. This will be bad. Lets see how bad...

 Indeed players must be earning too much or some such aspect which has to be 'improved'...my current 2022 roadmap is to earn as many credits as possible during my current premium time so that once used up i am done.

[Walther_K_Nehring]

12 hours ago, 1MajorKoenig said:

British Battlecruisers 

 

@linkum / @Walther_K_Nehring

 

Spanish Ships!!!!

 

 

[pzkpfwv1d]

Finally the other half of the British Fleet is arriving 

[1MajorKoenig]

1 hour ago, Walther_K_Nehring said:

 

Spanish Ships!!!!

 

 

Did you say “MiGs”? 

[YabbaCoe]

15 hours ago, Hakssor said:

What's gonna happen with the current expendable camos we have in inventory? Do we get the economic bonuses mirrored and separated? Or they're gonna lose their economic bonuses.

 

14 hours ago, Spezieh said:

Economic stats go away from signals and camos. How about premium camos. I bought them for exactly these economic bonuses. 

 

 

Regarding exact details on how this economy separation of camouflages will work, it is still too soon. We will make sure to inform you on all the details on how it will work in advance. So definitely check our DevBlog.

 

14 hours ago, affie said:

What is the point of the European tree when even smaller navies (Spain & Netherland) are getting their own nations?

 

When will Sweden get their own nation since the major part of European tech tree is made of Swedish mostly historical ships?!

European tree is for the nations, that doesn't have much data, historical ships and plans to make entire tech tree with few different branches. 

 

14 hours ago, Walter300 said:

I welcome any graphical improvement. The announced effects sound interesting. Adjusting the old ship models to the richness of detail of the newer branches would be very important to me. For example, the "glass" view of the bridge.

I am glad, that you like those. True is, that Gearing line was waiting long for its HD models. 

 

55 minutes ago, pzkpfwv1d said:

Finally the other half of the British Fleet is arriving 

Yes! Which ships you think can appear in that tech tree?

[Walther_K_Nehring]

23 minutes ago, 1MajorKoenig said:

Did you say “MiGs”? 

 

Missing in Gefecht?

[pzkpfwv1d]

23 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

Yes! Which ships you think can appear in that tech tree?

Invincble or a sister ship at T3 or 4

Lion or a sister ship at T5

Renown at T6 seeing as Repulse is a premium

Or maybe bump all of those down a teir and add courageous or glorious as designed at T6

Or maybe bump the first two down and insert Courargeous/Glorious at T5

One of Hood's cancelled sister ships at T7 (Anson, Howe and the third cancelled ship)

Not sure what ships to include for Tier's 8, 9 and 10 though 

[IntrepidCap]

13 hours ago, tsounts said:

WG, are you serious? Have you been paying any sort of attention to any of the actual feedback your players are providing? (short answer: NOOOOOO)!

That's the long answer.

 

Short answer: No

[BruceRKF]

28 minutes ago, pzkpfwv1d said:

Invincble or a sister ship at T3 or 4

Lion or a sister ship at T5

Renown at T6 seeing as Repulse is a premium

Or maybe bump all of those down a teir and add courageous or glorious as designed at T6

Or maybe bump the first two down and insert Courargeous/Glorious at T5

One of Hood's cancelled sister ships at T7 (Anson, Howe and the third cancelled ship)

Not sure what ships to include for Tier's 8, 9 and 10 though 

Agree with your t3 (Invincible), 6 (Renown) and 7 (modernised Hood sister), although I would put one of the Lions at t4 and then Queen Mary or, more likely, Tiger at t5 (Tiger being quite similar to Kongo).

Surely G3 has to be either t8 or t9. In fact, you could put different designs of that battlecruiser at t8 (e.g. with 3x3 381 mm guns) and t9 (3x3 406 mm guns). Not sure about t10, some other combination of a letter and a number, I suppose (e.g. K2, K3, J3, I3,...).

Edit: @Tzoli made a very nice overview over various RN battlecruiser designs way back in the day.