[FBC] Logan_MountStuart Players 416 posts 10,715 battles Report post #1 Posted January 13, 2022 With Wargaming announcing new Superships today and introducing Carriers that are essentially Tier 11 and above, let's see what they said when they first introduced Superships. Dear oh dear oh dear. 3 7 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[N_R_A] Hopeless_Guppy Players 3,753 posts Report post #2 Posted January 13, 2022 Tier 11 CV's ah no problem, I can't even play the tier 10 ones, lol 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PEZ] Yedwy Players 11,301 posts 39,586 battles Report post #3 Posted January 13, 2022 They lied as many times before, managenent lied so hardcore fans open the wallets for the hollidays, it passed, bonuses secured and its buissness as usual in St.Petrsbourg... 9 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FBC] Logan_MountStuart Players 416 posts 10,715 battles Report post #4 Posted January 13, 2022 3 minutes ago, Yedwy said: They lied as many times before, managenent lied so hardcore fans open the wallets for the hollidays, it passed, bonuses secured and its buissness as usual in St.Petrsbourg You are not wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[R7S] lovelacebeer Players 4,158 posts 25,226 battles Report post #5 Posted January 13, 2022 Sadly not surprising WGs statements are more disingenuous than those of politicians. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SYTHE] yagron_the_real Players 76 posts 4,822 battles Report post #6 Posted January 13, 2022 Not so dear WG, stop being retarded and put these supercarriers with their jets in the trash folder where they belong. Cheers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[RDNT] ZeuSueZ1337 Players 434 posts Report post #7 Posted January 13, 2022 At least its not CCCP subs with ICBMs..... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PEZ] Yedwy Players 11,301 posts 39,586 battles Report post #8 Posted January 13, 2022 2 minutes ago, ZeuSueZ1337 said: At least its not CCCP subs with ICBMs..... Wait till the 2022 Santa Dockyard... 4 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HAKUY] Yosha_AtaIante Players 8,032 posts 19,168 battles Report post #9 Posted January 13, 2022 49 minutes ago, ZeuSueZ1337 said: At least its not CCCP subs with ICBMs..... You mean outdated, sold Russian Charlie models that can barely launch when surfaced and are heard across the globe as loud as they are? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CPC] NoirLotus [CPC] Quality Poster 2,545 posts 13,201 battles Report post #10 Posted January 13, 2022 2 hours ago, Logan_MountStuart said: With Wargaming announcing new Superships today and introducing Carriers that are essentially Tier 11 and above, let's see what they said when they first introduced Superships. Dear oh dear oh dear. Yeah I thought exactly the same thing when I read the devblog !! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[R7S] Wulf_Ace Players 2,179 posts 12,310 battles Report post #11 Posted January 13, 2022 1 hour ago, lovelacebeer said: Sadly not surprising WGs statements are more disingenuous than those of politicians. i think someone in charge of WG is a guy like your profile picture 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobtherterrible Players 867 posts 14,307 battles Report post #12 Posted January 13, 2022 Hang on though, Super CVs can't be 11 as they are only for even tiers, so are these the first T12 ships? 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[KOKOS] ZeroSkillPureLuck Players 190 posts 24,945 battles Report post #13 Posted January 13, 2022 2 hours ago, Yedwy said: They lied as many times before, managenent lied so hardcore fans open the wallets for the hollidays, it passed, bonuses secured and its buissness as usual in St.Petrsbourg... The game is evolving.. grow up. 4 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TAYTO] ThePopesHolyFinger Players 1,101 posts 15,043 battles Report post #14 Posted January 13, 2022 1 hour ago, ZeroSkillPureLuck said: The game is devolving.. grow up. ftfy 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FALX] Hakssor Players 487 posts Report post #15 Posted January 14, 2022 3 hours ago, bobtherterrible said: Hang on though, Super CVs can't be 11 as they are only for even tiers, so are these the first T12 ships? This is the reason why they're not calling them Tier XI, so we can have CVs and subs 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SodaBubbles Players 1,553 posts 1,028 battles Report post #16 Posted January 14, 2022 6 hours ago, Yedwy said: They lied as many times before, managenent lied so hardcore fans open the wallets for the hollidays, it passed, bonuses secured and its buissness as usual in St.Petrsbourg... Pretty much this. I was delighted to see the more open presentation of information and how they think about things. Was thinking about cracking open the wallet. And then, they announce this trash, showing that there has been no fundamental change in the malicious, contemptuous attitude they have toward the playerbase and the game itself. Makes me sad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NODDY] Sprockett Beta Tester 220 posts 18,024 battles Report post #17 Posted January 14, 2022 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Panocek Players 13,176 posts 13,617 battles Report post #18 Posted January 14, 2022 14 hours ago, Yuu5Eleven said: You mean outdated, sold Russian Charlie models that can barely launch when surfaced and are heard across the globe as loud as they are? You mean they will live in their intended glory in World of Warships, where realism is optional? On second thought, I very much can imagine ballistic missile as "consumable", akin to airstrikes, that requires sub to be on surface and probably spotted for entire launch procedure duration. Instaclap on one in the open, but very much feasible for island camping Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FAM] tom_kat Players 147 posts 31,069 battles Report post #19 Posted January 14, 2022 First thing I though when I saw this new Dev Blog was "Wow, how fast time goes by, it's April Fool's day!". But no. Giving TXI to people with less than 200 battles and without any game knowledge it's a terrible idea. You don't read any feedback, right? Why did you ask for them if you literally don't listen to the playerbase? It's so hard to understand the bad impact of newcomers with TX subs will be as bad, if not worst, with TXI ships on random battles? I will beg to Jesus, Alláh, Buda, Michael Jordan and the Flying Spaghetti Monster that this was just a bad joke posted on the wrong date. And I'm atheist. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SWN] Asatori Players 377 posts 11,666 battles Report post #20 Posted January 14, 2022 Noone should be surprised that WG's stated reasons for doing things is always a lie. The only real reason for superships is simple: - WG has flooded the game with premium T9s and that tier is now pretty much saturated, a lot of players have multiple T9 premiums and are less likely to draw their wallet when the next one comes. Each new T9 will have deminishing returns for WG. - The best fix for that is: make them irrelevant by introducing T11, this way you can legitimise selling T10 for money instead of just for harder to obtain resources like steel or RP. With the introduction of T11 they will also open the flood gates for new T10 premiums that will be available for money. With anything WG does: scrap the reason they give, this is 100% always the BS reasons, ask yourself how are they going to monetise this, this will be the real reason WG does things. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[RODS] Ronchabale Players 3,002 posts 10,002 battles Report post #21 Posted January 14, 2022 We need a tier 11 for the "superships"... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SSDZA] PyroA [SSDZA] Players 83 posts 8,827 battles Report post #22 Posted January 14, 2022 Jeeeez... No comment No more words on how idiotic this game has become with all the broken junk they are adding. GG wg WP to destroy something that was actually really good. You really know how to fk up a good thing hey? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HAKUY] Yosha_AtaIante Players 8,032 posts 19,168 battles Report post #23 Posted January 14, 2022 11 hours ago, Panocek said: You mean they will live in their intended glory in World of Warships, where realism is optional? On second thought, I very much can imagine ballistic missile as "consumable", akin to airstrikes, that requires sub to be on surface and probably spotted for entire launch procedure duration. Instaclap on one in the open, but very much feasible for island camping They barely had that working around 1968. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Panocek Players 13,176 posts 13,617 battles Report post #24 Posted January 14, 2022 12 minutes ago, Yuu5Eleven said: They barely had that working around 1968. Russian naval guns IRL, especially early on had life expectancy of their barrels that can be charitably described as "optimistic" and had to be redesigned to not have to swap barrels mid fight, with each revision requiring different ammo, making logistics only tad more annoying. Sure, case of "teething problems" but that didn't stop WG from delivering "Russian Railguns", did it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-LD-] jagd64 Beta Tester 11 posts 22,475 battles Report post #25 Posted January 14, 2022 Yeah sure DO NOT FIX CV spotting first !!! morons!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
