Warning for unsporting conduct

[Maks0311]

If anyone from the World of warships staff ever reads this, consider it a first and last warning.

 

I am not quite sure yet why this popped up, but if I ever see this kind of threat again, rest assured that we will not stay together until the end of this countdown to 3. 

I did it once with another wargaming platform years ago, and I will do it again within a blink of an eye if I have to. 

 

So go ahead, test me.

 

Merry Christmas

 

[MementoMori_6030]

Vor 1 Minute, Maks0311 sagte:

consider it a first and last warning

Vor 1 Minute, Maks0311 sagte:

but if I ever see this kind of threat again

Vor 1 Minute, Maks0311 sagte:

rest assured that we will not stay together

💔

[pra3y]

Unless you're blind it says that u left the battle early, which could mean i guess either: 

 

a) you quit the battle while it was ongoing before yr ship sank; or

 

b) for some reason you d/ced.

 

Given yr tone im incline to go with (a).

 

[Sunleader]

5 minutes ago, Maks0311 said:

If anyone from the World of warships staff ever reads this, consider it a first and last warning.

 

I am not quite sure yet why this popped up, but if I ever see this kind of threat again, rest assured that we will not stay together until the end of this countdown to 3. 

I did it once with another wargaming platform years ago, and I will do it again within a blink of an eye if I have to. 

 

So go ahead, test me.

 

Merry Christmas

 

 

Ok Bye. lol

 

[ColonelPete]

Yes, they will quiver in fear. 

[Mad_Dog_Dante]

I do like this clip because it reenacts being in a toxic relationship at Xmas.

[Flaky26]

Před 11 minutami Maks0311 řekl/a:

I am not quite sure yet why this popped up

It tells you that you were hitting your teammates (friendly fire) or you were AFK or you left battle while you were still alive.

It doesnt mean much. You can ignore it.

You will lose that pink status after 2 battles (do not shoot in friednlies too much).

 

[RuruushuVuiBuritania]

Imagine threatening WG over having to be pink for 2 battles. A very measured response.

[RuruushuVuiBuritania]

4 minutes ago, Maks0311 said:

I don't think I've hit a friendly ship once so far. As for quitting battle a two seconds too early, I think they have much bigger problems to resolve, such as why it happened in the first place.

A problem Wargaming cant solve for years.

I am the last to be sanctioned for anything here. and I am never ever AFK.

If WG wants to play Hitler, they should randomly supervise in-game issues via moderators like other online gaming companies do.

So you admit to doing something that is not allowed, and find it surprising that you got punished for it, to the point where you compare WG with Hitler, but you are in a good mood? 

[Cyclops_]

Ooooh, posting a warning from WG will get you a warning for posting it in the forum 

[SV_Kompresor]

37 minutes ago, Maks0311 said:

If anyone from the World of warships staff ever reads this, consider it a first and last warning.

[MarChil]

I am more surprised WG has the brain to do something that is not completly broken or useless. Oh well, even a broken clock..... 

[AkerJack]

So...let me understand...you quit early and/or went AFK and it's WG fault? And the way to underline it is this one?

[Maks0311]

33 minutes ago, RuruushuVuiBuritania said:

 

 

The situation was hopeless anyway, otherwise I wouldnt click that Exit button obviously. It really was 2, or 3 seconds before I sunk. And I was sinking.

Mind that I was the only one against 5 or 6 with no support and no chance what so ever. In a sub. The entire team went on the other side. 

I am guessing, that is the only possible situation that could cause the warning today. But I was not AFK, and there was no friendly fire. And I will not tolerate possible bans on something I pay for, and I give my best into, unlike many.

 

The point is that no one is dealing with real problems, and this topic was not intended to be discussed with the players. You people are customers, and you should think like customers.

No hard feelings, and yes, Im in a good mood. Its Christmas after all. ha-ha

[RuruushuVuiBuritania]

3 minutes ago, Maks0311 said:

 

The situation was hopeless anyway, otherwise I wouldnt click that Exit button obviously. It really was 2, or 3 seconds before I sunk. And I was sinking.

Mind that I was the only one against 5 or 6 with no support and no chance what so ever. In a sub. The entire team went on the other side. 

I am guessing, that is the only possible situation that could cause the warning today. But I was not AFK, and there was no friendly fire. And I will not tolerate possible bans on something I pay for, and I give my best into, unlike many.

 

The point is that no one is dealing with real problems, and this topic was not intended to be discussed with the players. You people are customers, and you should think like customers.

- Quitting a game early is not allowed and also not really giving your best.
- Playing submarine is also not really a great option for giving your best.
- Even though you pay, you do not own your account and WG can see fit to change it at any time, which includes punishment.
- This is a forum, which is a place where things are discussed. You go to Customer Support if you want to appeal the decision, but you will get denied on the basis of the information that you have already given.

At least you are not someone that lies about their actions, but you still broke the rules.

[MarChil]

Hahaha, they brake their own rules constantly by promoting toxic gameplay, yet they give out a punishment to that. Oh well, it takes some level of self-awerenes to see your own faults I guess. Let's be happy they know how to keep the game functioning on the basic level.  

[Maks0311]

I see your point guys, no argue about that..

However, in that case rules are bad and need to be changed. 

Especially if they sanction those who work hard, and who will do the right thing in most cases.

And In this particular match, I was probably the only one.

 

The sub is just a coincidence now, and whatever I did, it could not change the outcome anymore. 

We all depend on each other in team games like this. And no one ever compensated me or you for wasting time and resources on catastrophic and ignorant players.

If that slightly too fast exit is a problem after all what happened there, than we all have a problem.

 

I am not mad, and I am dead serious about quitting. I left WoT because of that long time ago. 

 

 

 

[Cammo1962]

7 minutes ago, Maks0311 said:

However, in that case rules are bad and need to be changed. 

So if you leave battle before time and you are not dead or you keep hitting friendly ships the rules are bad and need changes because you get a warning ?? And the rules have been changed before thew changes you could do team damage that have been removed but you will still be warned about it and if you still hit team mates you will go pink.

[ColonelPete]

1 hour ago, MarChil said:

Hahaha, they brake their own rules constantly by promoting toxic gameplay, yet they give out a punishment to that. Oh well, it takes some level of self-awerenes to see your own faults I guess. Let's be happy they know how to keep the game functioning on the basic level.  

What is toxic gameplay and how is that promoted?

[MarChil]

By having Subs & CV's for example. One can't be spotted, the other can play without danger of being sunk. Both draw out decided battles for to long. They both make others play passive and they generaly do not promote teamplay. Both classes also attract a type of player that capitalise on that play style.

 

But you probably don't agree for some reason, yet that is the beauty of it. WG can decide what they think is toxic. 

[ColonelPete]

2 hours ago, MarChil said:

By having Subs & CV's for example. One can't be spotted, the other can play without danger of being sunk. Both draw out decided battles for to long. They both make others play passive and they generaly do not promote teamplay. Both classes also attract a type of player that capitalise on that play style.

 

But you probably don't agree for some reason, yet that is the beauty of it. WG can decide what they think is toxic. 

Both can be spotted and both can be sunk...

 

If understand you correctly, toxic gameplay is gameplay you do not like. Interesting.

[MarChil]

Like I said, you disagree. So do the Edited* at WG. But I think these classes display toxic behaviour for the reasons stated. And there in lays the problem that WG (and seemingly you) has no clue about. Every player that in your vieuw displays toxic gameplay can be sunk. So there is no toxic behaviour? Maybe think things through instead of making assumptions and black/white falacies. It might help :-) 

[KillStealBoss]

9 minutes ago, MarChil said:

So there is no toxic behaviour?

It's when your teammate goes to the corner of the map in a full hp DD and spams chat. Subs and CV are annoying, but such people as I described or those who deliberately push you out of smoke saying "stop camping noob" are an issue. You don't see them much it you don't play a lot. I do play a lot some days and I do see them quite often. 

[MarChil]

I never claimed that toxic behaviour isn't there. I was trying to point out the mistake in the reasoning of Col.Pete

[Yedwy]

4 hours ago, Maks0311 said:

I see your point guys, no argue about that..

However, in that case rules are bad and need to be changed. 

No they dont, dont f* leave the battle before its over and you wont get punished, if you want it to finish faster as 1 vs 5 or 6 then you go there and let them nuke you...

 

Here is what I see happened - you were to lose, you had plenty of dive capacity left in your sub so you decided to be a d*ck and dive to max depth ant then leave so the enemy has to sit there for the rest of the match looking for you and it backfired so you are sore...

 

Grow the f* up or get the f* out of the game

 

Bye