Last team standing: We need this in randoms.

[The_Angry_Admiral]

Not counting the clock of course but we need a mode in randoms where it's last team standing because I am tired of the capturing aspect of the game. So many wins for one side could end up losses if we had this mode. 

 

Having one mode for points capture is fine but we need ship vs ship until either the clock runs out or one team is gone. 

.

We need this all the time. 

[Tanaka_15]

eeee NO.

[SV_Kompresor]

Why tho?

[Tanaka_15]

2 minutes ago, SV_Kompresor said:

Why tho?

camone standard battle is bad. Now remove base from it it will be so booring camp fiesta even more. 

[The_Angry_Admiral]

5 minutes ago, Tanaka_15 said:

camone standard battle is bad. Now remove base from it it will be so booring camp fiesta even more. 

Actually it would deter camping because the timer would run out and your team could lose very easily. 

[Tanaka_15]

1 minute ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

Actually it would deter camping because the timer would run out and your team could lose very easily. 

nach, it would be total camp fiesta. People would not want to be first dead. And you would have 0 reasons to push. So wy would you even try to push in this mode? 

[Yedwy]

17 minutes ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

Not counting the clock of course but we need a mode in randoms where it's last team standing because I am tired of the capturing aspect of the game. So many wins for one side could end up losses if we had this mode. 

 

Having one mode for points capture is fine but we need ship vs ship until either the clock runs out or one team is gone. 

.

We need this all the time. 

So one team goes corner camping at one map corner and the other diagonally from them and what next?

[Admiral_H_Nelson]

6 minutes ago, Tanaka_15 said:

camone standard battle is bad. Now remove base from it it will be so booring camp fiesta even more.

 

1 minute ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

Actually it would deter camping because the timer would run out and your team could lose very easily.

To settle the argument, Wargaming could introduce the "Last Man Standing (or whatever)" mode as a test and monitor the results in the famous Spreadsheet.

 

It's not as if they have anything else going on at the moment.

[Tanaka_15]

Just now, Admiral_H_Nelson said:

t's not as if they have anything else going on at the moment.

hehehe just imagine this mode with subs in it. just imagine :D 

[FooFaFie]

23 minutes ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

Not counting the clock of course but we need a mode in randoms where it's last team standing because I am tired of the capturing aspect of the game. So many wins for one side could end up losses if we had this mode. 

 

Having one mode for points capture is fine but we need ship vs ship until either the clock runs out or one team is gone. 

.

We need this all the time. 

maybe with an endless shrinking map. 

[Yedwy]

1 minute ago, Tanaka_15 said:

hehehe just imagine this mode with subs in it. just imagine :D 

If anything I would put the capping Circle of Standard match on the opposite side from spawn, ofc with a time delay say first 7-10min the cap is grayed out and then well if you didn’t secure it… 

[The_Angry_Admiral]

13 minutes ago, Tanaka_15 said:

nach, it would be total camp fiesta. People would not want to be first dead. And you would have 0 reasons to push. So wy would you even try to push in this mode? 

But if you camp the opposing team is just going to rush you from both sides and sink you quickly. 

[The_Angry_Admiral]

14 minutes ago, Yedwy said:

So one team goes corner camping at one map corner and the other diagonally from them and what next?

Very seriously doubt that would happen. 

[Tanaka_15]

1 minute ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

But if you camp the opposing team is just going to rush you from both sides and sink you quickly. 

In theory, but random players want to camp to not die. So yeach. Thats that. 

[ColonelPete]

1 hour ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

Not counting the clock of course but we need a mode in randoms where it's last team standing because I am tired of the capturing aspect of the game. So many wins for one side could end up losses if we had this mode. 

 

Having one mode for points capture is fine but we need ship vs ship until either the clock runs out or one team is gone. 

.

We need this all the time. 

Also known as the great camping competition

53 minutes ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

Actually it would deter camping because the timer would run out and your team could lose very easily. 

Oh, sweet summer child

I do not know if there is a more obvious way to tell everyone that one does not know the game and its community.

[lovelacebeer]

I can easily imagine just how painfully passive such a game mode would be.

[Molly_Delaney]

Oh, FFS, if you want a quick match just have both teams spawn in the middle of the map, on Two Brothers.....

 

Naval Warfare is about control of territory more than destroying the other side.

 

[Karasu_Browarszky]

18 minutes ago, Molly_Delaney said:

Oh, FFS, if you want a quick match just have both teams spawn in the middle of the map, on Two Brothers.....

 

Naval Warfare is about control of territory more than destroying the other side.

 

 

Yes, but... only indirectly.

 

That's why I think we have those gimmicky cap zones in the game. We could just have battles which are based on ships/tonnage (make that HP) lost over the course of the battle. This would work similar to the points count we currently have in the game. Since the caps are entirely just a gimmick with little or no tactical value per se, I'd find the points count method mostly preferable.

 

If neither side can score a decisive victory (in terms of points), the battle would be termed undecided (draw).

[Bear__Necessities]

[Gvozdika]

5 hours ago, ColonelPete said:

Also known as the great camping competition

Oh, sweet summer child

I do not know if there is a more obvious way to tell everyone that one does not know the game and its community.

Bloody hell. I'm actually finding myself in agreement with the Good Colonel in his assessment of the OP's idea being daft. I'm struggling here.

 

Yes folks - the idea is THAT BAD! 

 

 

[Karasu_Browarszky]

Perhaps we could have a rolling map, to discourage camping, I mean. If you camp, you drop off the battle... or something? I know it's arcadey, because it's straight out an arcade mechanic, but if it works?....

[TheAlba2014]

1 hour ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

Perhaps we could have a rolling map, to discourage camping, I mean. If you camp, you drop off the battle... or something? I know it's arcadey, because it's straight out an arcade mechanic, but if it works?....

Ah...the good old Viking Saga battle mode...just be careful that the flat earthers don't tell you it's real!

[GulvkluderGuld]

15 hours ago, The_Angry_Admiral said:

Actually it would deter camping because the timer would run out and your team could lose very easily. 

 

Think of how often a DD or CV who ran/sits in the corner of the map cannot be killed before battle timer expires.

 

Now imagine a game with subs being able to dive and stay under for 10 mins.

[Ze_Reckless]

As someone who was around when this game was released I can tell you we already had this. Standard battles without points, the amount of 20 minute draws was unbearable.

 

As a solution to this problem, WG added points and domination mode. One of the best additions over the whole game life time.

 

This is a tactical / strategic shooter, if you want to play a free for all just play call of duty.

 

Also, I completed your collection of smileys. No need to thank me, it's my pleasure. 

 

[Karasu_Browarszky]

6 minutes ago, Ze_Reckless said:

As someone who was around when this game was released I can tell you we already had this. Standard battles without points, the amount of 20 minute draws was unbearable.

 

As a solution to this problem, WG added points and domination mode. One of the best additions over the whole game life time.

 

This is a tactical / strategic shooter, if you want to play a free for all just play call of duty.

 

Also, I completed your collection of smileys. No need to thank me, it's my pleasure. 

 

 

Not sure when they added that but... if I got here early enough, I don't recall having a problem with battles lasting too long or being boring back in 2015...

 

... it's more like the exact opposite with Now vs. Then....