Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Camperdown

Still the number 1 issue in the game

33 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
2,501 posts
17,258 battles

Lousy player skills.

Played 2 games so far, both stomps. I will not even begin to describe the idiocy. 

As long as WG does not give a flying :etc_swear: for game quality, this game will continue to founder. 

Too bad.

  • Cool 8
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[_PDW_]
Players
177 posts
17,743 battles

Let me quote one of my friends. 

 

"Why should I learn anything about this game if everything is random anyways."

 

I wanted to explain it to him, the problem I don't have much arguments to disprove him.

Edited by SobanRe
Wording
  • Cool 5
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
5 minutes ago, SobanRe said:

Let me quote one of my friends. 

 

"Why should I learn anything about this game if everything is random anyways."

 

I wanted to explain it to him, the problem I don't have much arguments to disprove him.

Easy. If everything is random, he can try to play the game blindfolded while hearing loud music and still get the same results as before. If he does not get the same results that way, then the game is not that random.

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 3
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[_PDW_]
Players
177 posts
17,743 battles
4 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

Easy. If everything is random, he can try to play the game blindfolded while hearing loud music and still get the same results as before. If he does not get the same results that way, then the game is not that random.

If you look at the performance of some players they probably trying this.:cap_hmm:

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
11 minutes ago, SobanRe said:

If you look at the performance of some players they probably trying this.:cap_hmm:

Nope. Not nearly there.

  • Boring 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1 post
1,072 battles

There are always going to be awful matches. There will also be great matches.

Any of these sound familiar;

You set yourself, check the other ships with you on your flank, start to push and notice 4 of your team are dead & the other flank has collapsed.

You're trying to fight carefully but all your teams DDs are rushing to cap zones rather than spotting and enemy ships keep disappearing before you can hurt them.

Enemy DDs are keeping you detected for incoming fire & occasionally a spread of torpedoes makes your life a misery. Your DDs, instead of hunting their DDs, are hiding behind an island 10k behind the front line.

 

When this happens don't rage. Don't cry. Reload & you'll get the match where the other side has this problem. 

 

Maybe 1 battle in 3 or 4 is a great match. Play for those. Remember those. Discuss those. Don't waste energy worrying about the others.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RODS]
Players
3,002 posts
10,002 battles
3 hours ago, Camperdown said:

Lousy player skills.

Played 2 games so far, both stomps. I will not even begin to describe the idiocy. 

As long as WG does not give a flying :etc_swear: for game quality, this game will continue to founder. 

Too bad.

MM would most likely do a better job if it was 100% random

3 hours ago, ColonelPete said:

Easy. If everything is random, he can try to play the game blindfolded while hearing loud music and still get the same results as before. If he does not get the same results that way, then the game is not that random.

Lol, pretty sure more than a few would improve.

 

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BS4]
Players
1,818 posts
10,056 battles
9 hours ago, Camperdown said:

Lousy player skills.

Played 2 games so far, both stomps. I will not even begin to describe the idiocy. 

As long as WG does not give a flying :etc_swear: for game quality, this game will continue to founder. 

Too bad.

2 games?

Half term

Its the Weekend.

Qy4CgxV.jpg

 

 

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BS4]
Players
1,818 posts
10,056 battles
2 hours ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

Perhaps WG will soon have 'Skill Bundles' available in the Premium Shop. :Smile_Default:

It would probably be discontinued due to "bellow average sales".

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
1 hour ago, Ronchabale said:

Lol, pretty sure more than a few would improve.

Try it out. Please tell us how many hundred battles you needed to land your first main battery hit.

  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[S-O-M]
Players
1,355 posts
5 hours ago, Camperdown said:

Lousy player skills.

Played 2 games so far, both stomps. I will not even begin to describe the idiocy. 

As long as WG does not give a flying :etc_swear: for game quality, this game will continue to founder. 

Too bad.

Haven’t I been saying that for a while; WGs inept management of noobs and greed to push out high tier premiums to those who couldn’t skipper an island.   The skills rework also didn’t help,   
 

Whist I agree that skill levels and the ability of a lot of idiots kill any enjoyment and our Win Rates for me the biggest issue is the MM,  for example all those with less than 1000 games should be in one queue and the rest of us in another one, it’s also unfair that a T8 BB, say monarch faces a Petro, fdr, Shiki, Kremlin, etc,etc,etc. lightning 5.5km detection and 8km torps vs Petro with 12km radar, that’s very balanced.   
 

We all know WG will do sweet FA about the playerbase because there’s no money in it,  what about the departing players (those that spend money, care and who’ve played for years).   

  • Cool 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts
6 minutes ago, MadBadDave said:

... all those with less than 1000 games should be in one queue and the rest is us in another one...

 

Which queue do you think would take longer?....

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[G-O-M]
Players
2,597 posts
13,191 battles
7 hours ago, Camperdown said:

both stomps

I played yesterday on NA server where I have a respectable 51% WR & I saw seven (that's 7!) roflstomp losses in a row. Total bull crap. Not one of these farces was even close.

Then I see a W which ended as a close battle (ofc) & we won by a time out (I sank 4 on that one).  7 Ls to 1 W. This just goes to show how blatantly BAD the garbage MM actually is.

  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[G-O-M]
Players
2,597 posts
13,191 battles
6 hours ago, ColonelPete said:

the game is not that random.

It certainly isn't 'random' - never was & never will be.

Wedgie says the battle queue is 'random' - that may be ...

However, how Wedgie determines who goes onto each side of the battle queue is not (although we will never be able to prove this as Wedgie hides it's battle queue coding under the excuse of a 'patent').

I saw 7 roflstomp losses in a row on NA server & every one of those battles were complete jokes of a random MM.

Then I saw a close W via a timed out battle (& I did my part on every battle so it wasn't 'git gud' as so many 'Turds' here like to barf out).

Hence, I 100% agree with the post topic by Camperdown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
1 minute ago, Aethervoxx said:

It certainly isn't 'random' - never was & never will be.

Wedgie says the battle queue is 'random' - that may be ...

However, how Wedgie determines who goes onto each side of the battle queue is not (although we will never be able to prove this as Wedgie hides it's battle queue coding under the excuse of a 'patent').

I saw 7 roflstomp losses in a row on NA server & every one of those battles were complete jokes of a random MM.

Then I saw a close W via a timed out battle (& I did my part on every battle so it wasn't 'git gud' as so many 'Turds' here like to barf out).

Hence, I 100% agree with the post topic by Camperdown.

:cap_old:

We have a thread for that...

Maybe you should read it.

  • Boring 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts
6 minutes ago, Aethervoxx said:

It certainly isn't 'random' - never was & never will be.

Wedgie says the battle queue is 'random' - that may be ...

However, how Wedgie determines who goes onto each side of the battle queue is not (although we will never be able to prove this as Wedgie hides it's battle queue coding under the excuse of a 'patent').

I saw 7 roflstomp losses in a row on NA server & every one of those battles were complete jokes of a random MM.

Then I saw a close W via a timed out battle (& I did my part on every battle so it wasn't 'git gud' as so many 'Turds' here like to barf out).

Hence, I 100% agree with the post topic by Camperdown.

 

I sometimes put on my fancy tinfoil hat. :cap_happy:

 

(Yes, it's made of those colored foils. It's special!)

 

During those moments I brainstorm all sorts of things. One of them is that the 'random' MM also serves the function of producing predetermined battle results. How else can you explain those complete, total, inexplicably unavoidable battles where you get steamrolled flat. That is, of course, if you could have steamrolls on water.... that part I still haven't completely worked out... :cap_hmm:

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[G-O-M]
Players
2,597 posts
13,191 battles
1 minute ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

During those moments I brainstorm all sorts of things. One of them is that the 'random' MM also serves the function of producing predetermined battle results. How else can you explain those complete, total, inexplicably unavoidable battles where you get steamrolled flat. That is, of course, if you could have steamrolls on water.... that part I still haven't completely worked out... :cap_hmm:

100% correct, Karas_Hidesuke, +1. :cap_like: Very accurate response.:Smile_Default:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[G-O-M]
Players
2,597 posts
13,191 battles
9 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

We have a thread for that...

Tell the OP who began this topic - not me. I'm just replying & agreeing with him (unlike you).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
11 minutes ago, Aethervoxx said:

Tell the OP who began this topic - not me. I'm just replying & agreeing with him (unlike you).

  • he talks about player skill, not MM
  • and I am agreeing with him that many players have lousy skills...
  • Cool 1
  • Boring 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[S-O-M]
Players
1,355 posts
4 hours ago, TymmiBoi said:

There are always going to be awful matches. There will also be great matches.

Any of these sound familiar;

You set yourself, check the other ships with you on your flank, start to push and notice 4 of your team are dead & the other flank has collapsed.

You're trying to fight carefully but all your teams DDs are rushing to cap zones rather than spotting and enemy ships keep disappearing before you can hurt them.

Enemy DDs are keeping you detected for incoming fire & occasionally a spread of torpedoes makes your life a misery. Your DDs, instead of hunting their DDs, are hiding behind an island 10k behind the front line.

 

When this happens don't rage. Don't cry. Reload & you'll get the match where the other side has this problem. 

 

Maybe 1 battle in 3 or 4 is a great match. Play for those. Remember those. Discuss those. Don't waste energy worrying about the others.

Says someone with less than 1000 games, invested much time and money in the game ? come back in 2 years time and repeat the above comment,  I spent ages going from sub 50% wr to over 50% and although average at best I’ve continued to improve and am a much better player than when I’d play 700 games.    The standard of the player base has definitely slipped even more over the last year,   Rofl stomps are a regular occurrence and carrying is seen less, now games are over within 5 mins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
705 posts
12,918 battles

Agreed

 

More stomps now than before 

 

Still some good games and good players 

 

Play it as a free to play game like I do now and it’s quite fun 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,200 posts
4,600 battles

WoWs is a totally accurate simulation of modern military.....

Expect everyone to be a 'Butterbar' or worse and you'll have fun.

Especially at weekends and during school holidays; oh look it's the end of half-term holiday in the UK.......

 

Quote 'The most dangerous thing on a Battlefield is a Junior Officer with a map and a plan'..........

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×