Would you pay for a improved (elitte) matchmaking like premium time ?

[Cirno9999]

Since so many people nagging about bad matchmaking i thought a bit , would you pay or not

 

 

[B051LjKo]

Only if the offer is available via loot boxes, then for sure! 

[Aethervoxx]

Until & when WoWS rolls back all their alterations since & including the CV rework, my wallet  will remain closed  *.

* except for a dedicated clan flag slot   - I'd spend for 'that' (hint, hint) 

[PaxtonQuigly]

What the f**k is even "elite" matchmaking?

Ban everyone lower than X% wr? Nice, now someone else will fill that void and have that winrate. Oh ban that person too? Nice, now someone else will fill that void and have that winrate.... see where this is going?

Besides, will this divide the already overstretched playerbase even more between those who pay for premium matchmaking and those who do not? Inb4 epic queue times yo.

 

[ColonelPete]

11 minutes ago, Cirno9999 said:

Since so many people nagging about bad matchmaking i thought a bit , would you pay or not

 

 

What is that supposed to mean? Buy wins?

[Cirno9999]

better matchmaking depending on your winrate on the selected ship

[PaxtonQuigly]

Just now, Cirno9999 said:

better matchmaking depending on your winrate on the selected ship

Better in what way? "Better" is really generic and subjective.

[RenamedUser_92906789]

Define better.

 

No wonder wg trying to milk us everywhere ... people would pay regardless of whats in the box.

[OldschoolGaming_YouTube]

23 minutes ago, Cirno9999 said:

Since so many people nagging about bad matchmaking i thought a bit , would you pay or not

 

 

Im not gonna pay WG for making a working MM, that should be in the free game, and I have zero confidence they even could make that because then why not implement it?

 

Pay for a CV free MM? Thats another story. But that will never happen because money loss for WeeGee.

[tocqueville8]

I would pay for a MM that makes steamrolls less common, possibly by keeping the average winrate of the two teams within a certain interval.

 

Then again, some steamrolls are going to happen anyway: unavoidable randomness + Lanchester's square law, or something like that...

 

With fewer steamrolls, games would last longer and generally be more profitable, as least for a decent player like myself. Sure, they would also take longer, so maybe at low-mid tiers they would turn out to be *less* profitable per unit of time, but not at high tiers, I think.

In a way, it would be a bit like premium time, except it would feel earned, not an artificial bonus.

[ColonelPete]

19 minutes ago, Cirno9999 said:

better matchmaking depending on your winrate on the selected ship

So paying to get weaker players on your team, when you are good?

[Cirno9999]

20 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

So paying to get weaker players on your team, when you are good?

more even matched one like 30-40% 40-50 and so on

[ColonelPete]

1 minute ago, Cirno9999 said:

more even matched one like 30-40% 40-50 and so on

So paying to wait 3-7 minutes?

[lafeel]

I'd quit on the spot, as then the game truly has gone pay to win.

[Taliesn]

7 minutes ago, lafeel said:

I'd quit on the spot, as then the game truly has gone pay to win.

 

This. It is pretty clear what the OP is hinting at. I shouldn't even have bothered to check his stats.

[Procrastes]

11 minutes ago, lafeel said:

I'd quit on the spot, as then the game truly has gone pay to win.

This.

[HMS_Britannia]

I would pay to be in a MM that had no CVs or subs in it, back to the good old days

 

 

[Aethervoxx]

.... err, umm, I know everyone can vote as they wish,  but you think OP is the first one here to vote 'yes'? 

[anonym_cwVecOS6ecVy]

The question alone shows what kind of sheeps still stick to WG, it is unbelievable to even think about such nonsense.

[Mad_Dog_Dante]

Bizarre.

[Bindolaf_Werebane]

For ELO matchmaking? Yes. For WR? No.

[B051LjKo]

3 hours ago, PaxtonQuigly said:

Better in what way? "Better" is really generic and subjective.

Well, you buy a loot box and have 3% chance to receive an uber haxor cammo, that enables you - 3 tier matchmaking, so you can take your Georgia, and end up in a match against Fuso.

 

I am sure this would be greatly appreciated by the player base and could be advertises as a unique player experience. 

 

PS. Hmmm, maybe Georgia vs. Fuso is not motivating enough, something like Kitakaze vs Bayern, or Alaska vs Pepsicola sounds even better!

 

I fully support this idea and hope they introduce it in paralel with the new set of rigged santa containers.

[Hirohito]

The poll results are probably way off here (5% saying yes).
I think most people interpret this answer as "do you want it in the game" (clear majority no), but I have no doubt that if this was implemented, a lot more people would buy it.

[johncl]

Its been happening from the start of the game ...

 

Whale MM

Premium account  premium ship MM

Premium account  MM

free to play MM

 

 

[bloodynicknames]

3 hours ago, Cirno9999 said:

Since so many people nagging about bad matchmaking i thought a bit , would you pay or not

 

 

dont give them any f*cking ideas

split the MM between below and above 51% and all is good but f*ck no I aint paying for that, WG created this crappy meta and incentivized players skipping tiers and rush to T10 without knowing how the f*cking game works so now its their turn to alleviate that problem