The "Soviet Aircraft Carriers" and "Aircraft Bureaus Rivalry" Events

[The_EURL_Guy]

Early Access to the new ship branch, plus a new temporary event!

Read it on the portal

[quickr]

[Aragathor]

I have a feeling the Chkalov won't be available for long.

[KHS01]

I love CVs I love this event! Thanks!

[SPIDERBAIT]

All looks interesting

 

Are the random bundles for doubloons weighted in anyway, or is it an equal chance to get across the board. Eg is it a 1 in 30 chance of getting a Nakhimov or is the chance less than 1 in 30

 

thanks

[Khaba_Gandalf]

Vor 2 Minuten, SPIDERBAIT sagte:

All looks interesting

 

Are the random bundles for doubloons weighted in anyway, or is it an equal chance to get across the board. Eg is it a 1 in 30 chance of getting a Nakhimov or is the chance less than 1 in 30

 

thanks

You don't get a Nakhimov, you only get the perma camouflage... 

[gnist0s]

23 minutes ago, Khaba_Gandalf said:

You don't get a Nakhimov, you only get the perma camouflage... 

YEP - lot of permanent camo to ships you eventually dont have - i have 100+ permanent camo's to ship i don't have or never have had, gathered in different missions - and you cant get rid of them      

 

   zzzzz

[Spartan_Renegade]

[slugford]

I am trying to be the change I'd like to see in the game, so I will not play Soviet CVs, but the perma-camos do look nice. 

[De4d_one]

Great...

 

At least give us tools to deal with those cvs, i feel like a damage pinata 90% of the time... Not to mention the issue of being perma-spotted

[tankzalott]

if only AA worked! all those AA ships pre reeeework were very good.. now they can't stop a cv attack!  cv's in their current state do not belong in this game and are detrimental to the fun of everyone else !

[416taylor]

nobody wants them and still they are coming more and more and then the subs.  doing the pacific force you in to coop three ship destroed and 2 top 3 among your team coop was full of US flags yesterday 

[Cronos]

BUYERS BEWARE!

 

Think twice before spending money on the Russian CVs and here is why:

 

As we have seen with the German CVs, the nerf to the Russian CVs will come shortly. 

After the release of the German CVs, the AP bombs accuracy got nerfed hard. This ruined the whole German CV line and turned the AP bombs into a dmg lottery. 

I foresee a nerf to the skip bombers in the near future. 

 

 

However, feel free to buy into the pre-release and/or premium russian CV if you want superunicum stats in 3 simple steps:

1) Play the fuk out of the ships (superunicum division mates is recommended)

2) Stop playing as soon as the nerf comes

3) Sit on your stats and never touch the ships again

 

 

This post doesn't say anything about the balancing of CVs of any nation in general and only criticises WG to deliver a not reliable product.

[CV_SUB_Report_Blacklist]

i have a question , what is the point of AA if it doesn't defend the ship  ?

 

the cvs were fair balanced before cv rework ,

 

you make it more enjoyable to play a cv , 1 player enjoy , and 11 players suffers in a team ...

 

 

[Hakssor]

8 hours ago, Aragathor said:

I have a feeling the Chkalov won't be available for long.

I'm guessing she is gonna get nerfed instead of being pulled. We haven't seen the disclaimer but I think it's gonna be in the article about her.

[KyraTiger]

6 hours ago, Cronos said:

BUYERS BEWARE!

 

Think twice before spending money on the Russian CVs and here is why:

 

As we have seen with the German CVs, the nerf to the Russian CVs will come shortly. 

After the release of the German CVs, the AP bombs accuracy got nerfed hard. This ruined the whole German CV line and turned the AP bombs into a dmg lottery. 

I foresee a nerf to the skip bombers in the near future. 

 

 

However, feel free to buy into the pre-release and/or premium russian CV if you want superunicum stats in 3 simple steps:

1) Play the fuk out of the ships (superunicum division mates is recommended)

2) Stop playing as soon as the nerf comes

3) Sit on your stats and never touch the ships again

 

 

This post doesn't say anything about the balancing of CVs of any nation in general and only criticises WG to deliver a not reliable product.

I do not agree (something to do with Russian Bias......)

 

Plus, the CIS players will NOT accept that their Nation's pride will be devastated by such a nerf 

[Van_Bazel]

Always get the ctrl C ctrl V feeling.

Must be me 

[Miscommunication]

An update literally nobody cares about. Who asked for RU CVs?

[Aragathor]

23 minutes ago, Miscommunication said:

Who asked for RU CVs?

Management at Lesta, which is never wrong.

[Blackjackjim69]

And another load of old cobblers, well done on ignoring the player base, subs and more cvs,  and i predict more players leaving, and less money in the wows coffer 

 

[Wicket_Boomber]

On 9/8/2021 at 9:29 AM, Miscommunication said:

An update literally nobody cares about. Who asked for RU CVs?

I dunno , but I wonder if they will make soviet/russian cv accurate , and everyone will be towed by tug boat...

 

AP , HE , SAP are not the biggest treat for soviet aircraft carriers , the biggest treat for soviet aircraft carriers are ... soviet crews ... so I have proposition for new soviet captain :

Ivan Ivanovich  - 

special skill

- Final call ( 5% quicker arrival of tug boat + 10% bust to tug boat speed)

- Dark whale ( - 5%/-15% to detectability , for every 10%/5% of heath lost , depend on amount dobloons bought in last 30 days)

 

 

 

[KHS01]

07.09.2021 saat 20:30'de, Cronos dedi:

BUYERS BEWARE!

 

Think twice before spending money on the Russian CVs and here is why:

 

As we have seen with the German CVs, the nerf to the Russian CVs will come shortly. 

After the release of the German CVs, the AP bombs accuracy got nerfed hard. This ruined the whole German CV line and turned the AP bombs into a dmg lottery. 

I foresee a nerf to the skip bombers in the near future. 

 

 

However, feel free to buy into the pre-release and/or premium russian CV if you want superunicum stats in 3 simple steps:

1) Play the fuk out of the ships (superunicum division mates is recommended)

2) Stop playing as soon as the nerf comes

3) Sit on your stats and never touch the ships again

 

 

This post doesn't say anything about the balancing of CVs of any nation in general and only criticises WG to deliver a not reliable product.

 

I agree with you. I'm considering getting a Chkalov, but I'm hesitant to buy it due to the danger of nerfs. WG should change this policy! Ships assigned to the game should no longer undergo modifications. Otherwise, the trust in the game ends.

[Benser33]

14 hours ago, KHS01 said:

I agree with you. I'm considering getting a Chkalov, but I'm hesitant to buy it due to the danger of nerfs. WG should change this policy! Ships assigned to the game should no longer undergo modifications. Otherwise, the trust in the game ends.

This attitude really does sound like "if I buy it because it's overpowered it should stay that way".

[arcticstorm123]

7 hours ago, Astolfo_Is_My_Waifu said:

This attitude really does sound like "if I buy it because it's overpowered it should stay that way".

Lol, of course everyone wants the overpowered ships, look at what's been removed, Belfast, the Kamikaze triplets,  Smolensk, Missouri (ok more for it's original credit earning potential), Kuznetzov and many more

 

People play this game to win battles and the best way is to have the OP ship, therefore people are now willing to pay stupid sums in "auctions" to get a legendary overpowered ship, I think that's human nature.

 

Problem is WG are using this psychology against us now by releasing something that's OP initially to drive up sales, which they can then nerf a few months later which is a particularly scummy trick.

 

They can't be trusted at this point not to mess with a ship once it's been bought as all ships are effectively tested live in game now, and instead of having to remove a ship as they used to they now merely nerf it.

 

What would you prefer to get from a crate, or to buy from the shop, Krasny Krym or a Kamikaze?

 

Would you buy a phone or a car if you knew it's performance would be substantially reduced 6 months later?

 

[Benser33]

6 hours ago, arcticstorm123 said:

Would you buy a phone or a car if you knew it's performance would be substantially reduced 6 months later?

Do I battle other people with my phone or car? Does me having a high performance phone directly impact other peoples phones?