Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Prophecy82

Marco Polo buff, when?

40 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
3,362 posts
26,028 battles

Shouldnt be there enough data that this floating turd desperately needs a buff? 

Like give it Smoke or 2 secs better reload. 

Lelpanto is sooo much better its not funny imo. 

  • Cool 7
  • Funny 2
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
683 posts
4,171 battles
20 minuti fa, Prophecy82 ha scritto:

Shouldnt be there enough data that this floating turd desperately needs a buff? 

Like give it Smoke or 2 secs better reload. 

Lelpanto is sooo much better its not funny imo. 

I don't see marco polos anymore, what is a marco polo ? :Smile_trollface:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,533 posts
33 minutes ago, Prophecy82 said:

Shouldnt be there enough data that this floating turd desperately needs a buff? 

Like give it Smoke or 2 secs better reload. 

Lelpanto is sooo much better its not funny imo. 

better reload

better concealment

better HP

and better rudder shift

 

Plz plz plz

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
3,274 posts
16,879 battles
39 minutes ago, Prophecy82 said:

Shouldnt be there enough data that this floating turd desperately needs a buff? 

Like give it Smoke or 2 secs better reload. 

Lelpanto is sooo much better its not funny imo. 

Zao just went ......

say what now ? - confused baby 1 | Meme Generator

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
23 minutes ago, Spartan_Renegade said:

They also hinted at Guilio Cesare re-release for Tier 6 quite a while ago and still haven't kept their word. 

Because they did not give us their word?

They suggested a Tier change. Playerbase did not like it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,442 battles
25 minutes ago, Spartan_Renegade said:

They also hinted at Guilio Cesare re-release for Tier 6 quite a while ago and still haven't kept their word. 

We had that tier VI ship for testing as one idea how to get more balanced Guilio Cesare. But this wasn't taken positively from players and it would also mean direct nerf of a premium ship, which we don't want to do.

That is why this tier change didn't happen. 

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,368 posts
37,429 battles
32 minutes ago, Spartan_Renegade said:

They also hinted at Guilio Cesare re-release for Tier 6 quite a while ago and still haven't kept their word. 

There was never a promise. It was just an idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SVX]
Players
1,850 posts
20,871 battles

yea they might buff marco polo in about 5 years they need more data! #zao is doing fine  

 

meanwhile lets buff Alexander Nevsky FOR MOTHER RUSSIA 

  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,362 posts
26,028 battles
4 minutes ago, albin322 said:

 

meanwhile lets buff Alexander Nevsky FOR MOTHER RUSSIA 

Nevski isnt getting a buff, they actually fixed a bug that existed since its release. 

Im fine with that. 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SVX]
Players
1,850 posts
20,871 battles
5 minutes ago, Prophecy82 said:

Nevski isnt getting a buff, they actually fixed a bug that existed since its release. 

Im fine with that. 

my point still stands, you will have to wait atleast a few years before the buff it !

you just made my point how long did it take to fix the bug ? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HABUS]
Freibeuter, WoWs Wiki Team
1,291 posts
10,716 battles
Vor 21 Minuten, YabbaCoe sagte:

We had that tier VI ship for testing as one idea how to get more balanced Guilio Cesare. But this wasn't taken positively from players and it would also mean direct nerf of a premium ship, which we don't want to do.

That is why this tier change didn't happen. 

Could you ask if the balancing team is fine with the current Marco Polo? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,362 posts
26,028 battles
13 minutes ago, Chaoskraehe said:

Could you ask if the balancing team is fine with the current Marco Polo? 

 

 

No need, I can answer this for you already:

 

"We are monitoring the situation regarding Marco Polo closely"

 

Actually you can set this statement universal, since its always right. 

 

Here you go, no need to bother the balanz-homunculi:

 

"We are monitoring the situation regarding [Shipname] closely"

  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,362 posts
26,028 battles
47 minutes ago, OldschoolGaming_YouTube said:

Zao just went ......

say what now ? - confused baby 1 | Meme Generator

Polo is the premium BB version of the Zao, but worse. 

Zao can atleast hit shi+.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PEZ]
Players
11,301 posts
39,586 battles
1 hour ago, gopher31 said:

Why buff Marco Polo when instead they could release a buffer version called Parco Molo?

U mean Porco Malo? :Smile_hiding:

 

I ll get my coat… 

  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
62,190 battles
1 hour ago, Spartan_Renegade said:

They also hinted at Guilio Cesare re-release for Tier 6 quite a while ago and still haven't kept their word. 

Don't worry Comrade, you think they forgot about that? Naaaaah. There's a Novorossiysk battleship which was a Guilio Cesare taken by the Soviets as war reparations. Just swap a camo and you got a brand new premium that WG spent sooooo much time creating it. Yeah . :cap_haloween:

nov1.jpg

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,442 battles
27 minutes ago, Chaoskraehe said:

Could you ask if the balancing team is fine with the current Marco Polo? 

 

 

Well, I can ask, but it is more than certain, that I won't get any publishable info on when and how we will balance certain ships.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
855 posts
7,183 battles
46 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

We had that tier VI ship for testing as one idea how to get more balanced Guilio Cesare. But this wasn't taken positively from players and it would also mean direct nerf of a premium ship, which we don't want to do.

That is why this tier change didn't happen. 

Well, that's a bummer. I always wanted a GC for ranked. It was actually on discount during my initial days in this game but I impulse brought Dunker as my first premium because I was still stanning over Nolan's Dunkirk at that time and cause the ship looked much better...aesthetically. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PEZ]
Players
11,301 posts
39,586 battles
11 minutes ago, MacArthur92 said:

Don't worry Comrade, you think they forgot about that? Naaaaah. There's a Novorossiysk battleship which was a Guilio Cesare taken by the Soviets as war reparations. Just swap a camo and you got a brand new premium that WG spent sooooo many time creating it. Yeah . :cap_haloween:

nov1.jpg

In all honesty - give it a +15% speedboost consumable, normal HE/AP and some AAA buffs and she could make a fair T9 supercruiser…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LAFIE]
Beta Tester
7,707 posts
7,856 battles
1 hour ago, YabbaCoe said:

We had that tier VI ship for testing as one idea how to get more balanced Guilio Cesare. But this wasn't taken positively from players and it would also mean direct nerf of a premium ship, which we don't want to do.

That is why this tier change didn't happen. 

The Doria also does a great job of showing how much of a change for the worse this'd be.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,362 posts
26,028 battles
46 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

Well, I can ask, but it is more than certain, that I won't get any publishable info on when and how we will balance certain ships.

Im sure you will monitor the situation closely, tho.... right? :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×