[NWP] Bear__Necessities Players 5,291 posts 15,379 battles Report post #1 Posted August 23, 2021 https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/195 6 28 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PEZ] Yedwy Players 11,301 posts 39,586 battles Report post #2 Posted August 23, 2021 Impossible, its just another example of us peons not using the game correctly… 1 18 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NECRO] MementoMori_6030 [NECRO] Players 6,381 posts Report post #3 Posted August 23, 2021 Funny how their "analysis" matches their players' predictions. This must be surprising for WG, because this has never happened before. Oh, wait. 1 25 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-RNR-] Tanaka_15 Beta Tester 2,514 posts 20,269 battles Report post #4 Posted August 23, 2021 So not the CVs are problem but the smoke crusers? Big brain time 2 13 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ADRIA] nlegolass Players 125 posts 2,971 battles Report post #5 Posted August 23, 2021 Il y a 1 minute, Tanaka_15 a dit : So not the CVs are problem but the smoke crusers? Big brain time Well... They're banning the two most used CVs so... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-OOF-] Miscommunication Players 550 posts 6,680 battles Report post #6 Posted August 23, 2021 I really don't think this will change anything about the way this CB season is playing out. There are other T6 CVs that can be played instead (Ark Royal, Ranger, Furious), and for the whole smoke cruisers playstyle, my clan has been running 2 CVs, 2 Huanghes, 2 Leanders and a T61. All we have to do is swap out one of the Leanders for a Dallas/Pensacola (that will camp in smoke), and just add a second DD for more smoke. Joke of a season. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[AWG] blademansw Beta Tester 279 posts 7,500 battles Report post #7 Posted August 23, 2021 This just adds even more proof that they do not play their own game. As demonstrated by a certain RU Ex CC ;-) 25 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OYO] FooFaFie Players 837 posts Report post #8 Posted August 23, 2021 Why not say all ships may only be once in the team. Doesn't matter if it's a Pepsy, Aoba, Ise, Perth, ...Now making restrictions for some ships is just stupid and asking for problems. Secondly after a ship is played it's looked for 1/2h (or even 1h) for clan battles. This will force clans to play other ships, other setups, other strategies, ... (Also it will force players to have multiple ships in that class = money money money = happy bosses Just my 2 cents on the problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Camperdown Players 2,501 posts 17,258 battles Report post #9 Posted August 23, 2021 20 minutes ago, Bear__Necessities said: https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/195 I think you are being unnecessarily negative. They appreciate your feedback and have acted promptly on it 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sunleader Weekend Tester, In AlfaTesters 5,710 posts 13,400 battles Report post #10 Posted August 23, 2021 Bigger Problem here. Is that this does not really Fix the Problem. It just Masks the Statistics. Because by doing this they basicly make the Statistics look more Diverse due to the most Popular Ships being reduced later on so that the Final Picture of the Statistics then Says "Oh Yeah look here. We got alot of Variations of Ships used" 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CMWR] Lootboxer Players 3,817 posts 21,306 battles Report post #11 Posted August 23, 2021 They missed T61, next Monday maybe? 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WCBG] BrusilovX Beta Tester 2,838 posts 23,907 battles Report post #12 Posted August 23, 2021 12 minutes ago, WarGamblingUnlimited said: They missed T61, next Monday maybe? Isn't that when they ban all TVI ships from the game mode? Also, add submarines as they are well integrated after a week or two in co-op 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BS4] SeaWolf7 Players 1,818 posts 10,056 battles Report post #13 Posted August 23, 2021 Imagine having to ban ships you designed .....from your own game 20 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TF57] Fatal_Ramses Players 1,300 posts Report post #14 Posted August 23, 2021 For the pleasure of the playerbase we added dual-CVs to clanbattles. We also banned 1/3 of the CVs in that tier. Our carefully collected data from the past 7 days made us do this. Our carefully collected data for the past 3 years tell us: CVs are absolutely fine, carry on peo... players. In effort to reduce smoke emissions and greenhouse gasses we have put down "some" limits to some of the following cruisers.... 1 12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NMA] Prophecy82 Players 3,362 posts 26,028 battles Report post #15 Posted August 23, 2021 Except not really. Smoke train is still viable or wait, does that not mean you can have 2xHuanghe + 2xPerth? While the most OP CVs will be banned, I think, given the maps, BBs will still not be viable. Also: Oh Noes! *Suprised Piccatchu face* who would have thought that the meta would be that way?! Apparently Devs that have no clue about their own game.... 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Camperdown Players 2,501 posts 17,258 battles Report post #16 Posted August 23, 2021 21 minutes ago, SeaWolf7 said: Imagine having to ban ships you designed .....from your own game It would indeed be embarrassing for any organisation with any sense of dignity 2 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OZYR] Andrewbassg Players 3,800 posts 25,867 battles Report post #17 Posted August 23, 2021 1 hour ago, Bear__Necessities said: https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/195 When I told them on NA the way to utilize two Cv's is 1 DD 2 smoke cruisers and two HE spammers they looked at me like ..."um what?" Lulz.... When all the game devs have combined ~300 matches in a....year.......... what you can expect..... only meme's 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[_I_] Nibenay78 Players 3,266 posts 27,734 battles Report post #18 Posted August 23, 2021 Why not only CV and we can see how popular clan battles will be.. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TORAZ] El2aZeR Beta Tester 15,786 posts 26,801 battles Report post #19 Posted August 23, 2021 WG being comedians as always. 4 16 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TACHA] DeviousDave02 [TACHA] Players 679 posts 3,786 battles Report post #20 Posted August 23, 2021 Because having Ryujo and E.L. was never going to cause issues It's not like anyone could have seen that one coming. ... oh wait... 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TOXIC] Kartoffelmos Alpha Tester 2,237 posts 8,884 battles Report post #21 Posted August 23, 2021 3 hours ago, El2aZeR said: WG being comedians as always. Sooo... since the blue highlighted text is obviously incorrect based on the collected statistics, when can we see a global/t6 CV nerf? So much for using the spreadsheet to balance the game and not on "obviously biased opinions". Not that anyone's surprised... 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CptBarney Players 8,127 posts 245 battles Report post #22 Posted August 23, 2021 20 minutes ago, El2aZeR said: WG being comedians as always. They recognise queen Elizabeth's authority and superiority. Peasants be weegee 1 9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TACHA] DeviousDave02 [TACHA] Players 679 posts 3,786 battles Report post #23 Posted August 23, 2021 47 minutes ago, CptBarney said: They recognise queen Elizabeth's authority and superiority. Peasants be weegee tea drinking :Intensifies: Spoiler 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
King_Of_The_Potatoes ∞ Players 308 posts 4,564 battles Report post #24 Posted August 23, 2021 How dare you people mock WG the spreadsheet is working as intended. What that intention is who the hell knows but it is working. 11 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BODEM] FukushuNL Players 1,235 posts 8,476 battles Report post #25 Posted August 23, 2021 So adding CVs to CB triggers everyone to play smoke cruisers and now they are banning the smoke cruisers to "get rid of the problem"? Is this a correct assumption? If so, that's like shining a flashlight in someone's face, who covers his eyes with his/her hands and to get rid of the problem, you peel away his/her fingers instead of just turning of the flashlight. 5 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
