Jump to content
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
YabbaCoe

PSA: Recent community incidents and our actions

567 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[BLITZ]
Modder
5,484 posts
10,103 battles
4 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

there are a few specific points we’d like to comment on

And the rest remains unanswered?

 

And I cannot find an apology at all in those words above? Will there be one or is that all we got?

  • Cool 21
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
406 posts
13,832 battles

I mean..... HOW is this statement different from any of your other ¨incidents¨?
And calling this CC exodus an incident... that's quite the insult. 

  • Cool 21

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POP]
Beta Tester
304 posts
10,162 battles
4 minutes ago, Blivonops said:

And this statement took you several days? Hello?

IMO it's good that they took their time (also, weekend). Hastily scribbling together a poor response would only made things worse. Not that this response is in anyway comprehensive enough though.

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VELOS]
Players
226 posts
3,430 battles
4 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

We appreciate the community feedback about Missouri being obtainable via Random Bundles exclusively in 0.10.7. We've been discussing this since last week and decided to add an alternative way to purchase the ship. We will provide details on our Devblog soon

A simple damage and most efficient control is to make it available for an amount of doubloons just to calm the s&*&^storm.

Instead you are making things more complexed and makes us the clients to hmmmmm...

 

AND I ASK YOU, WARGAMING. HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO TRUST YOU AGAIN AND SPEND MY MONEY IN YOUR GAME. MONEY DON'T GROW ON TREES YOU KNOW...

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,436 posts
10 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

On the topic of Missouri, we know that there is an open question whether her earnings are on par with the pre-update version, especially considering signal flags and camouflage bonuses. We're carefully analyzing her adjusted earnings following the update, and will share our decision whether any adjustments to the mission are to be made.

You mean the changes and adjustments you literally already made without even saying a word?

Is this a out of season April fools joke?

Mo.thumb.png.3ca120b9f23313d8b1a38b02d1620715.png

 

  • Cool 9
  • Funny 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3 posts
1,002 battles
1 minute ago, MixuS said:

IMO it's good that they took their time (also, weekend). Hastily scribbling together a poor response would only made things worse. Not that this response is comprehensive though.

This so called statement does not even scratch the surface. It utterly disgusts me that such a large company can't come up with something decent. I wonder why I even expected some sort of decency from them...

  • Cool 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CATS]
Alpha Tester
630 posts
12,775 battles
8 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

Hello everyone, 

 

We are awfully sorry that AprilWhiteMouse and other CCs are no longer a part of our Community Contributors Program, and we’d like them to know they will be missed. We respect their decision and want to thank them for their contributions, devotion, and passion for the game and program over several years. We wish all of them best of luck and hope that they will stay in touch with us nevertheless, we will always be here to talk. 

 

We understand that there are several causes that have led us to this situation and that we have upset and disappointed many of our CCs and players. While some of these causes are self-explanatory, and our commitment to fix them remains, there are a few specific points we’d like to comment on: 

 

  • We appreciate the community feedback about Missouri being obtainable via Random Bundles exclusively in 0.10.7. We've been discussing this since last week and decided to add an alternative way to purchase the ship. We will provide details on our Devblog soon.
  • On the topic of Missouri, we know that there is an open question whether her earnings are on par with the pre-update version, especially considering signal flags and camouflage bonuses. We're carefully analyzing her adjusted earnings following the update, and will share our decision whether any adjustments to the mission are to be made.
  • Regardless of AprilWhiteMouse's CC membership status, we will stay true to our commitment to release HMCS Huron in 2022. She’s been added to our production plans and is scheduled to arrive around late Summer 2022.  

 

Best regards, 

WoWS Team

You made very clear in the last years that you don't give a flying f*** about the feedback they gave, and a lot of other things too. You only cared about them as long as they gave you reach and new players. Now that the damage is done and they HAD to do this last possible option to show you what you did you start to rethink SOME of your newest horrible missteps. As always, this is just a damage control move and even in this one you fail to be honest. *slow clap*

  • Cool 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WGP2W]
Players
3 posts
12,050 battles
7 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

On the topic of Missouri, we know that there is an open question whether her earnings are on par with the pre-update version, especially considering signal flags and camouflage bonuses. We're carefully analyzing her adjusted earnings following the update, and will share our decision whether any adjustments to the mission are to be made.

How is it an "open question" whether signal bonuses can be applied to new Missouri combat bonus mission or not? It was proven that signals do not apply to combat mission, thus earnings are not on par with old Missouri. Please explain this, because this makes no sense whatsoever. The whole point is to stack percentage bonuses. Altering a constant variable does not solve this. 

  • Cool 5
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Clan Test Coordinator
138 posts
1,454 battles
1 minute ago, S1d3wind3r said:

That is such a lame statement,and that took you 2 days?

Investigation always take time and jumping to conclusions abrupt is not very healthy.

  • Funny 14
  • Boring 4
  • Bad 24
  • Angry 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
25 posts
11,762 battles

Do you guys at Wargaming have no shame at all? How can you even look at yourself in the mirror? No apology and no proper explanation about anything, disgusting is the right word.

  • Cool 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×