What we want from Wargaming

[Myrmix]

After the growing disaster of Wargaming's PR, we could try to tell them what we would love to see improved:

- Shredding the spreadsheet and a return to feedback from experienced players.

- Putting submarines on hold, until CVs are balanced, only using them in coop convoy scenarios

- Giving the whole premium shop a permanent 50% price cut

- Displaying drop chances of containers

- Easy dockyard missions (who don't need to be finished with doubloons and can be achieved by playing 2-3hrs a day) for one premium per month

- Return of flags for achievements and doubling them

- Increasing the credit gain for tech tree ships by creating new missions for permanent (community-designed?) camos in the campaigns.

I know, these are big requests, but WG's tactic was always "overshoot and dial back to a smaller scam". I think we can learn from that.

What would you love to see, as unrealistic as it seems?

[ColonelPete]

I want posts that I can read....

[Linkaex]

Management needs to resign
Terrible led company  

 

[MementoMori_6030]

For the game?

Debugging. No more lame excuses or denials.

And CV like submarines starting at T6, so you can evade everything bad in the game at T1 - T4.

 

 

[Camperdown]

I would like some common decency from WG.

[SV_Kompresor]

17 minutes ago, Myrmix said:

- Easy dockyard missions (who don't need to be finished with doubloons and can be achieved by playing 2-3hrs a day) for one premium per month

Okay, calm down your greed a little.

 

17 minutes ago, Myrmix said:

-Increasing the credit gain for tech tree ships by creating new missions for permanent (community-designed?) camos in the campaigns.

Please no

 

[DocStrangeFruit]

They also need to return the 5 missing Operations that were promised by them as even though they said they would not work the new CV rework but this was proved false after they returned on OP that has a CVs in it.

 

Fix Co-Op so that you can earn more xp and credits like you could several years ago.

[Myrmix]

36 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

I want posts that I can read....

Well that's a censorship I haven't seen yet

(Should work if you mark the text tho)

[von_chom]

57 minutes ago, Myrmix said:

 

- Giving the whole premium shop a permanent 50% price cut

 

- Easy dockyard missions (who don't need to be finished with doubloons and can be achieved by playing 2-3hrs a day) for one premium per month

 

- 50% off ,you are joking, right ?

- dockyards are ok now, look at it as a kind of season pass, pay or dont pay, both ways you will get something out of it

[Myrmix]

3 minutes ago, von_chom said:

- 50% off ,you are joking, right ?

- dockyards are ok now, look at it as a kind of season pass, pay or dont pay, both ways you will get something out of it

I'm not. I'd like to pay less for a single ship than for a tripleA game.

Dockyards used to be achievable without doubloons (see Kamikaze R) and season passes are a travesty initself.

[Dutchy_2019]

 

 

Things went wrong - disregard

[Bellegar]

59 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

I want posts that I can read....

 

Yeah... me too 

[rage1750]

A change in company ethos will be needed, with gameplay put above pumping out more ships for the premium shop.

I would settle for the current game decision maker(s) becoming unemployed.

It is abundantly clear that whoever has been calling the shots since the Great CV REEEEwork is not fit for purpose; unless that purpose is milking the playerbase dry and making WeeGee into the new EA.  

[Mastodon2]

We also want Napolk to be added to the armoury and / premium store again as I'm short on coal and still want to buy her.

[lovelacebeer]

I would certainly go for displaying drop chances on loot boxes, 

 

Halting the sub project or at least making a separate mode for it,

 

Return of the missing operations, ideally occasionally making new ones. 
 

A serious effort to fix bugs like curving torps. 
 

Actually taking feedback into consideration not blindly following spreadsheets 

[WorthyOpponent]

NOT taking popularity or total battles as a parameter for how balanced a ship is. 

 

Doing actual QnAs, not the ones we have which simply go "Our data says otherwise. You're wrong and stupid for asking. No changes."

 

EVENTS BASED ON HISTORY. 

 

MORE SPECIAL EVENTS.

 

Less tech tree lines to put more thought and testing into it.

 

LET STREAMERS USE TEST SHIPS IN STREAMS AGAIN.

 

More maps

 

More campaigns

 

Essex, Taihou and Shinano.

 

Return of achievements, more achievements and keeping the weekly flag missions for newer players.

 

A Research Bureau rework. 

 

More reasons to play T10 tech tree ships (Like tying Research Bureau to T10 ships, similar to WoWS: Legends and their T7s)

 

LESS LOOTBOXES AND RANDOM BUNDLES.

 

NO SELLING T10 SHIPS.

 

[Brinckie]

I understand where these request come from.

Wg is a company that needs to make money to actually keep in bussines.

They own it and they can do whatever they like, just don't be a huge fallus about that.

 

They don't need to be such a lousy one with their shady lootboxes(7yrs+ ! and unknown drop rates etc.), communication "errors" and misleading sales tactics and the likes, that is the main thing imho.

If they Screw things up they need to own it up and fix and improve things in the future.

 

We are all humans and we are prone to making mistakes, especially big companies are good @ that. 

Wish they tried improving the game playability,  and new player experience, No OP ships in in T4/5(CV/CL/CA/DD), better and more even MM, making less unbalanced ships and then accordingly the teams.

For instance multiple radars on one team and then none or only 1 on the other, same for CV, DD balance between the teams, and yada yada.

 

Making decent tutorials in game for the new and even returning players, just to improve the overall gameplay. 

Don't mind losing, the one sided rollovers are what gets me down.

[DaBung]

Maybe just showing players (including CCs) they are valued? I think for most the rest said here that’s a essential prerequisite which is sorely missing now and a big part of why this walkout and general outrage has happened. 
 

And I mean really valued, not some throwaway line, actual changes & compromises like the ones suggested. 

[SirAmra]

Giving the payers an option to have subs and cv in battle or not.

As long as they keep pushing the subs I stay away.

 

[KillStealBoss]

If they don't want to bring back the flags from achievements at least make them cost like the ramming flags cost now which is a decent price (240k credits for 20 flags) . And give more containers with flags each week. 

[Vork]

Specify "we" please, because I don't agree with most of your points.

 

1. You think experienced players agree on how to balance the game? Nope.

2. Testing subs in ranked is fine, and CVs are okish. Idon't like playing them, but I'm not bothered with them.

3. They can keep their prices, I'm just not going to pay full price for a ship. Even at 50% off a tier 9 I think a tier 9 is overpriced. And it's not I can't afford it, it's just I can spend my money better.

4. Agree, never bought them, maybe I will then.

5. Why do we need 1 premium ship for free per month? Play techline ships. And the dockyard is fine.

6. It will benefit good players and player who blow up a lot. So I think they are on the right track, but they schould give more flags maybe.

7. No need.

[WorthyOpponent]

5 minutes ago, Vork said:

Specify "we" please, because I don't agree with most of your points.

 

1. You think experienced players agree on how to balance the game? Nope.

 2. Testing subs in ranked is fine, and CVs are okish. Idon't like playing them, but I'm not bothered with them.

3. They can keep their prices, I'm just not going to pay full price for a ship. Even at 50% off a tier 9 I think a tier 9 is overpriced. And it's not I can't afford it, it's just I can spend my money better.

 4. Agree, never bought them, maybe I will then.

5. Why do we need 1 premium ship for free per month? Play techline ships. And the dockyard is fine.

6. It will benefit good players and player who blow up a lot. So I think they are on the right track, but they schould give more flags maybe.

7. No need.

Ehem.

2 hours ago, Myrmix said:

What would you love to see, as unrealistic as it seems?

Post your own ideas then. This topic isn't for discussing about what OP wants. It is for everyone to write what they want. Don't derail it. 

[HMS_Edinburgh_C16]

the game is dead, we just don't see it yet 

[Ze_Reckless]

This thread would fit into a fairytale, it has nothing to do with reality. You won't get anything.

 

Take what they give or leave it. Use the game like WG uses you. Or don't. All you do here is keep WG's shredder well fed.

[illy]

make the game fun and enjoyable again, no point playing if you're not having fun.... same happened with WOT many years ago