Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Icecaptain10

So... The Missouri

34 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
50 posts
255 battles

Well well WG.  Seems you have screwed up again.  I was 100% ready to buy the Missouri outright.  You in your infinite wisdom decide to put it in "Random" bundles.  I guess my wallet will remain closed then :)

  • Cool 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
6,636 posts
25 minutes ago, Icecaptain10 said:

Well well WG.  Seems you have screwed up again.  I was 100% ready to buy the Missouri outright.  You in your infinite wisdom decide to put it in "Random" bundles.  I guess my wallet will remain closed then :)

Lol. What, where? I wanna have a good laugh.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
50 posts
255 battles
17 minutes ago, Kieodo said:

Good decision, without the extra credit earnings the Missouri is incredibly underwhelming

I don't care about the credit earnings nerf. Credits are not an issue for me.  Its the history if the Missouri that draws me.  Sadly WG wants to make us gamble for it soooo.  *closes wallet* I do not support this

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NECRO]
Players
6,381 posts
Vor 1 Stunde, Icecaptain10 sagte:

"Random" bundles

We know how this "randomness" is working... lowest odds first, increasing towards the end, so 2/3 of all financial supporters of WG have to go through at least 75% of the bundles.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
550 posts
6,680 battles

Such a frustrating thing to do. I was pleased to see Missouri back for the historical reasons - but then they go and ruin it like this.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,238 posts
16,405 battles
8 minutes ago, hellhound666 said:

i love this part:

misso.thumb.png.65b576f896a44381efd0402dbc0dee28.png

 

It is true.

Mission: Earn 1,000,000 credits

There goes my Missouri with every +% credits flag (and camo) you can get your hands on, job done in 1 Random battle.

 

Lol at how they are selling it and knowing it'll work. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,664 battles
1 hour ago, Kieodo said:

without the extra credit earnings the Missouri is incredibly underwhelming

This. The game has changed a lot since MO was first released; sure, the radar can be useful, but with all the CVs and radar not being uncommon, she strikes me as a rather unremarkable BB in most other respects.

 

As a DD enthusiast, I mainly worry about MOs because most of them have experienced captains in them; it's not because of anything inherent in the ship.

(Full disclosure: I have MO, but I'm entirely dreadful in her - ew, BB cooties!)

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
50 posts
255 battles
1 hour ago, Mavewreck said:

Such a frustrating thing to do. I was pleased to see Missouri back for the historical reasons - but then they go and ruin it like this.

To add to this; If it was there intent to make us gamble for it, the nerf was not necessary.  Leave it as is or nerf it and sell it for $ in the premium shop.  How hard is that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,664 battles

I suspect that WG may be experimenting with a 'new' release model, with ships they perceive as especially desirable (Agincourt being similar):

  1. Release them in gamble boxes, to extract maximum money from the really keen.
  2. Release them later via more normal means to hoover up any money left on the table.

The second part is assumed, of course, but it does make sense (unless they're keeping both Agincourt and MO as bait for Xmas boxes)...

 

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts
23 minutes ago, Icecaptain10 said:

To add to this; If it was there intent to make us gamble for it, the nerf was not necessary.  Leave it as is or nerf it and sell it for $ in the premium shop.  How hard is that?

 

Let's keep an eye on what the description on those containers will say... :cap_cool:

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,238 posts
16,405 battles
59 minutes ago, hellhound666 said:

it won't

 

Grinds and random bundles for silver ships you'll get for free in a few weeks time and permacamos that are worse than the hundreds of camos you're already swimming in... check

Dockyard ships with strategically placed intermediate prizes that you can only get if you pay cash... check

Famous BB in random bundles... check

 

They do it because it works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
50 posts
255 battles
1 hour ago, Verblonde said:

I suspect that WG may be experimenting with a 'new' release model, with ships they perceive as especially desirable (Agincourt being similar):

  1. Release them in gamble boxes, to extract maximum money from the really keen.
  2. Release them later via more normal means to hoover up any money left on the table.

The second part is assumed, of course, but it does make sense (unless they're keeping both Agincourt and MO as bait for Xmas boxes)...

 

If they keep MO as Xmas lootbox bait then the nerf is unwarranted, especially in light of them making it a random chance thing soon instead of just offering it up for straight up purchase.(this would warrant the change to its credit earning).

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONUS]
Beta Tester
1,866 posts
2 hours ago, hellhound666 said:

it won't

lol of course it will work. Most people don't read, they only see the words "Missouri" and "bundle" and instantly click buy. 

 

I expect to see a lot of threads pop up here soontm about how Missouri doesn't live up to their expectations regarding credit earnings. Why do you think they're selling it as Missouri, instead of New Jersey or Missouri Beta or something. 

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
50 posts
255 battles
4 minutes ago, Bellegar said:

lol of course it will work. Most people don't read, they only see the words "Missouri" and "bundle" and instantly click buy. 

 

I expect to see a lot of threads pop up here soontm about how Missouri doesn't live up to their expectations regarding credit earnings. Why do you think they're selling it as Missouri, instead of New Jersey or Missouri Beta or something. 

WG could have put Missouri in the shop for $100 and I would have paid that to guarentee getting it rather than however much it will cost to gamble away in loot boxes.  Credit earning be damned. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WCBG]
Beta Tester
2,838 posts
23,907 battles
1 hour ago, Verblonde said:

The second part is assumed, of course, but it does make sense (unless they're keeping both Agincourt and MO as bait for Xmas boxes)...

You mean I've missed my chance to get a Makarov in an Xmas box?

 

I was wondering with the MO if they would ever nerf the ship (with the usual line about balancing).  So, there are players that already have it and those that will somehow get their hands on it in the future.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×