Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Miscommunication_dept

Ragnar coming for steel!

44 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[HABUS]
Freibeuter, WoWs Wiki Team
1,291 posts
10,716 battles

Not having Torps heavily reduced my interest in her :Smile_sad:

 

With Torps I would have get her, so I think I will buy shiki. 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
855 posts
7,183 battles

 

A tab bit expensive for a spammer on roids!  If I were to get a steel DD,  having good torps would be my primary concern over AA build or dakka. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,664 battles

Good timing: I've almost got enough steel (with a coupon used).

 

If she's any good, I suspect I'll feel the urge, although the lack of torps does make her more of a novelty item than - say - Smaland.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
Players
7,047 posts
32,326 battles

I'm 10k away. Almost sorry I used my coupon already.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,664 battles
3 minutes ago, nambr9 said:

Watching some play and it looks pretty crap.

I'll wait for some reviews; for me, it's between Ragnar, Plymouth, and that US 'T10 Atlanta' thing (whatever that's called)...

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BASIC]
Players
1,113 posts
27,820 battles
7 minutes ago, nambr9 said:

Watching some play and it looks pretty crap.

 

Remember that the final version is supposed to be even worse! (one less consumable?)

Handling and shell ballistics look awful, just watched some streams

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,512 posts
24,469 battles

It does look a bit of a long range spammer. When radar is on cool down it’s clumsiness and concealment will be big downsides.

It also doesn’t dispatch destroyers as well as I expected, Druid certainly does it faster.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
539 posts
8,558 battles

Ragnar sounds like a Smaland with harder hitting guns and more HP (26.5K base HP is quite high) while giving up torps and slower reload. I think it's a good DD since it has 30mm HE penetration and also can citadel cruisers like Elbing. I'll defo get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,512 posts
24,469 battles
10 minutes ago, MannequinSkywalker said:

Ragnar sounds like a Smaland with harder hitting guns and more HP (26.5K base HP is quite high) while giving up torps and slower reload. I think it's a good DD since it has 30mm HE penetration and also can citadel cruisers like Elbing. I'll defo get it.

The AP pen is more Druid than Elbing and it does not have improved ricochet angles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GJE]
Players
939 posts
11,373 battles

I was waiting for steel DD, but I'll pass for now, until I see reviews. Looks a bit boring... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,664 battles
19 minutes ago, MannequinSkywalker said:

Ragnar sounds like a Smaland with harder hitting guns and more HP (26.5K base HP is quite high) while giving up torps and slower reload.

Do we know what Ragnar's concealment is like? I recall reading she is from the 'spotted from Pluto' school of Destroyer design; Smaland isn't great for sneakiness (6.1 km from memory, although I could be wrong) but she isn't actively bad in this regard...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
539 posts
8,558 battles
4 minutes ago, gopher31 said:

The AP pen is more Druid than Elbing and it does not have improved ricochet angles.

True 45-60 degrees vs 60- 75 degrees but Ragnar is more accurate, has the best dispersion with 61m while for instance, Druid has 106m :Smile_great: Plus Druid has only AP which is not very useful on bow in targets while Ragnar can utilize its HE 11% fire chance and 30mm pen. Seems fine to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
539 posts
8,558 battles
1 minute ago, Verblonde said:

Do we know what Ragnar's concealment is like? I recall reading she is from the 'spotted from Pluto' school of Destroyer design; Smaland isn't great for sneakiness (6.1 km from memory, although I could be wrong) but she isn't actively bad in this regard...

Base concealment is Surface: 9.46km, Air: 4.66km. What does it make, 7 something after camo and all applied?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,362 posts
26,028 battles
1 minute ago, MannequinSkywalker said:

Base concealment is Surface: 9.46km, Air: 4.66km. What does it make, 7 something after camo and all applied?

Seems viable with 8.5(?) km radar...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
62,194 battles

I was hoping to see it for free exp... :cap_old:

And the amount of steel for it is a bit too high imho. 22k would be ok.

 

@Prophecy82 it doesn't have def AA and the long range is pretty meh dmg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
539 posts
8,558 battles
4 minutes ago, MacArthur92 said:

I was hoping to see it for free exp... :cap_old:

And the amount of steel for it is a bit too high imho. 22k would be ok.

Well if you have the coupon, you can get it for 20.250 steel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,828 posts
9 minutes ago, MannequinSkywalker said:

It has 7.5km radar, just pop the radar when you are spotted.and kill the dd.

 

You can try :)

 

But since Ragnar literally is a floating brick, you will most likely fail.

 

Add no torps and no hydro... fail guaranteed.

 

Smalland is far superior for this role.

WHat use would radar be to Elbing? None.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
539 posts
8,558 battles
6 minutes ago, nambr9 said:

 

You can try :)

 

But since Ragnar literally is a fliating brick, you will most likely fail.

Of course we will see after playing it but 4x152mm guns with best dispersion at 3 seconds (base) reload and high pen sounds good enough to fight off most dds except maybe Khaba and French DDs. Ragnar also comes with improved repair party which has HP restoration: 50%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,664 battles
8 minutes ago, gopher31 said:

7.5km max concealment and radar.

so when a radar is available the concealment is not a big problem. When it’s on cool down it’s a problem.

The problem (compared to things like Orkan/Smaland) is that the opposing DD has a much easier time baiting your radar; it's essentially the same trick you pull against radar cruisers - spot them on the edge of their radar range, then run away (bravely, of course) when the radar goes off, so making them waste their charge.

 

Would I assume correctly that Ragnar's radar run-time is similar to Orkan/Smaland?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×