Write here your biggest everyday annoyance when in WOW

[OldPappy]

2 hours ago, ghostbuster_ said:

• BBs who spawn at a flank and decide to go all the way to other flank.  if they do that in ships like vermont, this is insta chatban reason for me. 
• BBs who camp all the time
• Players who think kiting its the only thing they should do while playing ships like henry. even if enemy has like 900 points and 3 caps. 
• Cyclones
• Detonations
• CVs which try to snipe enemy CV...
• CVs which dont spot
• CVs which decide to strike an enemy ship, make it turn and avoid all the torps.
• CVs which fly right through enemy fighters and lose their planes
• CVs which roleplay an airfield and die. 
• CVs being immune to fires
• the fact your skill meaning absolutely nothing against CVs. (Lack of counterplay)
• AA being useless
• Bullsht smolensk
• WG adding new bullsht gimmicks like airdrops
• WG adding stealth radars despite all the feedback
• WG adding BBs with radar.
• Devs having no freaking clue about their own game
• incompetent testers/contributers/etc.
• SHELLS FALLING SHORT BUG AND WG IGNORING ITS EXISTENCE. (even now im annoyed.)

 

@YabbaCoe you (WG) do still ignore the existence of this bug, dont you? 

Don’t you like cvs???😳🤔

[Verblonde]

36 minutes ago, Prophecy82 said:

Made my day. Thank you!

<butler voice> I aim to be of service...! </voice>

 

(Thanks for helping me notice a typo I made too - now fixed.)

[Verblonde]

2 minutes ago, Psychological_Warfare said:

propaganda videos for so called "naval legend" russian ships

I have to admit this stuff rather does get on my Paridae too, although rather than engendering anger, I tend to feel pity instead - it must be sad to be so insecure as to need this sort of - for want of a better word - fluffing...

[anonym_cwVecOS6ecVy]

10 hours ago, tsounts said:

Horrible players buying their way into high tiers even though WG had stated completely the opposite few years ago when Missouri was first released....

 

Additionally, everything else that has been stated above by fellow players!

I actually put that one great sentence into my signature. I suggest anyone who is against this practice to continue, should do so too!

[NobleRipper]

5 hours ago, 159Hunter said:

The road taken by development of the game as this is the cause of almost all items listed above.

Agree with this so hard. Plus, it's still as true now as it was halfway down the second page of the thread...

 

For me, it's just the fact that every time I log in to WoWs, deal with the slow and sticky UI, wait through the enthusiasm-killing battle loadtimes and the extra couple of minutes at the beginning of a battle before anything actually happens (fortunately not an issue in Ops), at the end of it all I know that any fun I end up having isn't through the devs' efforts anymore, but virtually in spite of them.

[Foxhound421a]

Players who take a brawling and tank lines like the German BBs and hide at the back using spotting aircraft. 
 

DDs that leave me to take the Cap in a BB or cruiser.

 

Players who cry aim bot or hack when they get hit hard or sunk especially if they are sat stationary and broadside at point blank range.

 

British carrier bombers being under armed 

examples the swordfish could carry 6 250lb bombs (might be a tad OP at TIV and TVI!) 

Firebrand could carry 2 2000lb bombs 

Sea Hornet can carry 2 1000lb bombs 

All of which is a lot more than the current aircraft carry.

 

 

[ghostbuster_]

20 hours ago, YabbaCoe said:

You mean bug with shells falling short?

By saying "SHELLS FALLING SHORT BUG AND WG IGNORING ITS EXISTENCE", yes i mean that...

Quote

Well, it can be subjective,

Wait, what? How the f can it be subjective if i dont have any FPS or ping issues? And how the f every single player i know has the same issue. Enlighten me. How can it be subjective?

Quote

but there is a big possibility, there is a bug. Even though everytime it is good to have more data, when you experience a bug like this.

It happens literally in every time when shooting at ships which are grounded or sitting still. Its actually increadible that you need "more data"...

Quote

 But currently we don't have an info about ETA of the possible fix.

 

 Ofc you dont. See my original post: "AND WG IGNORING ITS EXISTENCE". Nothing new 

[Nibenay78]

20 hours ago, YabbaCoe said:

You mean bug with shells falling short? Well, it can be subjective, but there is a big possibility, there is a bug. Even though everytime it is good to have more data, when you experience a bug like this. But currently we don't have an info about ETA of the possible fix.

 

This happens frquently and is vastly annoying. 

My favorite happening was a non-moving, somewhat angled enemy on low hp (really close range and think some fast shooting cruiser). Due to the slight angle and its was no reason to actually go for a cit, i just aimed just below the deckline to simply hit with as many shells as possible.

 

Almost all went into the water in front. And i am like "fuuuu... it happened!!". Target still alive and starts to eat my hp fast. Now aim just above the deckline, and fire again. Like 70% went into the water, luckily a few hit...

[MementoMori_6030]

Am 29.7.2021 um 00:20, SodaBubbles sagte:

My teammates. 

Tbh I have long discarded the thought that there are teamates... or teams, in the first place. I firmly deny any association with that useless rabble and play as if they are not present (which, in most cases, is true, and in the majority of the rest rather detrimental than supportive).

[Foxhound421a]

Suggestion for upsetting Mouse and Chobitsu wargaming should make them a personal ship just for them as a surprise.

My idea is a refit warspite at tier 7 small tube boilers increase the speed to 28knots, guns are replaced with 15/45s, 4 inch guns are replaced with 4.5s and the 6 inch guns are kept if it’s possible.
My reasoning is it will get the community off wargamings back it will also get their biggest supporter back. It also goes without saying that you could also sell the ship easily everyone loves warspite an improved version like I described would be an easy money maker as it uses existing assets. what I am trying to say is they need to show the community that they care yes they have sorted out the Yukon incident but it doesn’t mean they should stop their damage control.

 

Next

we have had a number of soviet cold war naval legends while obviously these are easy for you to do we have yet to have a few classes that saw a lot of service.

we can start with the Oberon class an extremely popular sub class used around the world with a few preserved.
 

next suggestion Leander class frigates again used around the world and saw action.

 

Now 2 ships that everyone should know Conquerer and Invincible like who can forget when Conqs stole state of the art soviet hydrophones from an AGI without being detected!

there are plenty of ships they could do personally I’d put a few up to a vote it should bring down the number of complaints.

[NewHorizons_1]

Team mates in battleships, typically German as they "have" to brawl, that don't look where they're going and push your ship out of its smoke screen.

One had the grace to apologize and fessed up that it was the autopilot's "fault"

[SkollUlfr]

cartoon dispersion.

cartoon shell velocity.

cartoon ballistic arcs.

 

all the things that make the game stupid and make hiding behind a cliff a thing.

[Pandafaust]

For me, it has to be abysmal decision making from teammates.

[Bellegar]

On 7/29/2021 at 3:45 PM, Von_Pruss said:

I actually put that one great sentence into my signature. I suggest anyone who is against this practice to continue, should do so too!

My signature is already quite full, but I support every movement to include WG's insanity in signatures!

[Camperdown]

CVs that don't move when their flank collapses and get killed.

Ships that push wwww at start and yolo and die in 2 minutes.

BBs pressing F7 all game while camping at the back.

DDs hiding behind other ships. Same when there is a CV in the game cuz there is CV!

BBs with full HP at end of game while entire team has been killed.

Ships that change flank at start of game.

DDs smoking up in a cap and dying to torps.

Cruisers flipping on radar when 10 km behind their DDs.

Cruisers not using their radar even if you beg them. And no, radar is not on cool down.

Cruisers and BBs rushing to cap, then turn and deleted by cits.

 

The list is frankly endless 

 

[Karasu_Browarszky]

Rocks, small maps, HE spam, angry clouds both with supernatural and regular aim, island huggers, bad tactics... did I mention rocks?

[RenamedUser_92906789]

[Inked9]

A groups of nobs who want to temporarily bivouac on an island or even the biggest island ( maybe even taking samples) 3/4 of a set and piss and whine for support and or bark orders with out supporting anything but the beach their pitching their tent on.

[Mookle]

Not being able to see ship xp in port, or the tech tree, without hovering over the ship. 

[MementoMori_6030]

Vor 22 Stunden, Inked9 sagte:

bark orders with out supporting anything but the beach

I am in the comfortable situation that I do not play for credits, XP, new ships or shiny stats, so there is no incentive for me to play well and/or strive for victory if my "team" annoys me. I am playing torpedo destroyers most of the times.

You are correct - almost every game has the stereotypical bunch of BBs playing the cookie game behind an island at least 15 km distant from the enemy, pinging me and a cap zone like it's the only ability they possess, which is probably not too far from the truth. Everytime this happens, I stop my engines.

And wait.

Until the pinging resumes, intensifies, insults are filling the chat... and I reply: "Give me 5 minutes; I am meditating about the perfect course to that location." After the next ping: "I can't concentrate if you do this, now I have to start over."

Who needs karma if he can have fun?

 

 

[Cyclops_]

Your BB that never fire at a DD when it is spotted, yet when I get spotted in my DD every Red BB crap on me from a great height 😔

[Yedwy]

On 7/31/2021 at 7:40 PM, nambr9 said:

+1

[Aethervoxx]

Having so many unbalanced battle results - roflstomps whether a W or a L - and even battles where one side has half their team survive.

 

 

[Hades_warrior]

On 7/28/2021 at 10:02 PM, Genie_of_the_Lamp said:

Tell one of your biggest annoyances here.

 

mine:

 

If there is a division consisting of 2 or 3 destroyers and which is therefore automatically placed together on 1 flank by the system. While there are 3 Caps.... So the other flanks have no eyes at all. And you decently ask this division if they would please split up so that we have a better balance on each flank. And that they just ignore this; then all three sit on a CAP .... in their own smoke or not ... And that I warn them that this will certainly turn out to be a loss. And that I am being laughed at by them through the chat. But that after 4 minutes we still have not caught this CAP ..... in the meantime 2 destroyers of this platoon have already died and the 3rd is soon to follow the rest to the Seabottom ....died by radar or torps towards their precious smoke. Meanwhile The enemy has taken all the other CAPS with the greatest of ease and the battleships and cruisers there with ease could torpedoed away from the other CAPS and the remnants are fleeing badly battered..... and that this is the umpteenth match that day, with a bunch of stubborn stupid players that make you lose again even as a reasonably good player...they just refuse to take advice...

 

WG just plz stop these kind of setup of ships; especially when there is a division with Destroyers. Put them more balanced on the whole area.

This thread is easy - CVs.

Not even one but the one.

[Ubertron_X]

Container animations...