Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
gabberworld

ships Radar

88 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[P-A-R]
Players
1,012 posts
13,896 battles

So looking at my ships in port I wondered :" hey why does this one have this nice rotating radar antenna but it doesn't have radar? And this one, and this... Hey where are my radars?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Beta Tester
2,514 posts
20,222 battles
48 minutes ago, gabberworld said:

nothing much as radar have limit range expect those op  russian ships

apart ofc of making ALL concilment Bulid ships usless. And this also means, no more CL and CA stealch gameplay. Mate it is Balancing and for me there is way to many radar ships and radars in game. ANd you want to make it even worse. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
1 minute ago, stefanorgano said:

But wait, we already have permanent radar in game! It's called "aircraft carriers".

 

only if some CV players actually know that, would be nice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
Just now, gopher31 said:

Do you play destroyer?

yeah, 99% times, i not scare radars as i know that they run them out, and then i todo whatever i want

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
3 minutes ago, gopher31 said:

And you see no problem with radar giving you an effective 10km concealment for the whole game?

 

not really when team does his job part as well.

 

 problematic starts be when you feel like you alone in battle

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
1 minute ago, CastorTolagi said:

straight_line.gif

 

that's not what i say here really, in this topic i mean more like Missouri

 

tenor.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,362 posts
26,028 battles
1 minute ago, gabberworld said:

 

that's not what i say here really, in this topic i mean more like Missouri

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Beta Tester
2,514 posts
20,222 battles
5 minutes ago, gabberworld said:

i mean more like Missouri

jup bbs should not have radar. At all. Thats right. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,450 posts
Vor 11 Minuten, gabberworld sagte:

that's not what i say here really, in this topic i mean more like Missouri

ahhh:

Vor 1 Stunde, gabberworld sagte:

with Missouri  i cant protect myself from dds because they have unlimited torpedoes, would not say that its balanced 

 

as for dd player myself, i like that unbalance

Instead of stupid ideas how about:

gud2.thumb.png.418cdc03d857f0b2a9d9537c1610a9ab.png

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
5 minutes ago, CastorTolagi said:

Instead of stupid ideas how about

 

 

i not see that i propose the idea in here really,  i say more like something else, like Missouri Radar crew fill be killed at by end off every battle. i not see that i need ship like that

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CMWR]
Players
3,817 posts
21,306 battles
2 hours ago, gabberworld said:

First pop me up ok it have radar. but now there is problem  why the hell ships have limited radars? 

For the same reason that my  Asashio does not have permanent Torpedo Reload Booster or smoke generator.

Imagine me spamming 8 torps every few seconds in your direction.

Game balance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
Just now, DariusJacek said:

For the same reason that my  Asashio does not have permanent Torpedo Reload Booster or smoke generator.

Imagine me spamming 8 torps every few seconds in your direction.

Game balance.

 

well, that was more like others players idea for constant radar. i  would just take off the radar limit like dd have that limit for torpedoes self

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Beta Tester
2,514 posts
20,222 battles
1 minute ago, gabberworld said:

 

well, that was more like others players idea for constant radar. i  would just take off the radar limit like dd have that limit for torpedoes self

hmm so you still dont think that constant radar is game breaking? Amazing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CMWR]
Players
3,817 posts
21,306 battles
1 minute ago, gabberworld said:

well, that was more like others players idea for constant radar. i  would just take off the radar limit like dd have that limit for torpedoes self

You do not have limit on ammo, why DDs should? Radar is no ammo, it's consumable like TRB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
6 minutes ago, Tanaka_15 said:

hmm so you still dont think that constant radar is game breaking? Amazing. 

 

its not constant as there like 2 min pause or something , for  30 sec radar

 

you can make it constant if you have 4 radar ships in battle and they work as team

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Beta Tester
2,514 posts
20,222 battles
21 minutes ago, gabberworld said:

its not constant as there like 2 min pause or something , for  30 sec radar

Radar last longer than 30s, for DM it is over 60s. 

 

21 minutes ago, gabberworld said:

 

you can make it constant if you have 4 radar ships in battle and they work as team

And this shuld laso be limited. There is way to many radars in this game.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
4,528 posts
2 hours ago, gabberworld said:

Soo i been thinking little bit in here 

<snip>

After reading your post the emphasis of this phrase should be on "little bit" and not on "thinking".

  • Funny 3
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BAD-F]
Players
758 posts
21,892 battles
2 hours ago, gabberworld said:

 

with Missouri  i cant protect myself from dds because they have unlimited torpedoes, would not say that its balanced 

 

as for dd player myself, i like that unbalance

If a bb had no protection from dds then all bbs in the matches would be torped and sunk before the end. It is very hard to torp a bb that has one eye on the minimap and use WASD hacks on regular basis. And a dd that gets spotted have a hard time for 20 odd seconds even if he stays cool and goes dark asap. 
So the odds are about even on paper and then it depends on the players in each ship. A dd who knows his trade will never be spotted in a 1v1 situation, but against an equal ”non-potatoe-player” in the bb, the bb will not get torped to death either. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles

 

 

12 minutes ago, OldPappy said:

A dd who knows his trade will never be spotted in a 1v1 situation, but against an equal ”non-potatoe-player” in the bb, the bb will not get torped to death either. 

 

yeah can be, dd is not easy kill with guns either from bb and as for that risk you can  go and rush bb to broadside  and kill him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BAD-F]
Players
758 posts
21,892 battles
1 hour ago, gabberworld said:

 

 

 

yeah can be, dd is not easy kill with guns either from bb and as for that risk you can  go and rush bb to broadside  and kill him

True. That risk is there!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
3,801 posts
10,499 battles
10 hours ago, gabberworld said:

yeah, 99% times, i not scare radars as i know that they run them out, and then i todo whatever i want

2,445  (31.06%)
Battleships
525  (6.67%)
Aircraft carriers
2,738  (34.78%)
Cruisers
2,165  (27.50%)
Destroyers

 

 

Glad you're not making up easily verifiable claims.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×