Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
The_EURL_Guy

Developer Bulletin for Update 0.10.7

120 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
3,368 posts
37,429 battles
Just now, WWDragon said:

It already did, Jean Bart Black.

Re-read what i wrote " the ships available for resources now could be removed", keyword "now". 

 

Just now, WWDragon said:

But that wasnt the point,

What was the point?

 

2 minutes ago, WWDragon said:

Tier IX ships are available as well for resources and some only with resources,

and? again what is the relevance of what you wrote with Missouri coming back to shop for doubloons?

 

3 minutes ago, WWDragon said:

I already said what my problems with this is.  

Am i supposed to follow up with your probs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,314 posts
52,321 battles

I have Missouri and the thing this ship really needs is to get her reload to 28 seconds. I'm using the accuracy mod which makes these guns reload on 30 seconds and that's not good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-F-K]
Players
237 posts
15,078 battles

Missouri was an unique ship, now downgrade to a "one from a dozen". This is about WG money hungry.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WHO]
Players
36 posts
5,468 battles

Maan i'm so sad.

I started to play in january 2018. That was the time when the missouri got pulled out from the tech tree and the store. I've had like few weeks to decide: "Do i want to pay this much money on a "digital ship"?" And of course, after a few weeks of playing the game, i decided not to. That was my biggest mistake since i play this game :)

I didn't even knew about the credit earning capabilitities of the ship. I was just the ordinary casual playing guy who only knew about some ships. And ofc Missouri was the first and almost only ship that i knew of.

Since then, i was always "dreamed" about getting Mo some day in a santa/super crate. I was not that lucky sadly. I've got Kutuzov and Belfast, but no Missouri (i think thats the most rare ship you can get from even a santa crate).
And now here we are... "Here you go: You can buy the Missouri again! Oh did we mentioned that we're gonna nerf the income modifier for you?" I feel a little bit scammed. I know that it's not a scam ofc, but i feel it that way. I seriously thinking on not even buying the ship. And i didn't thought that i would say this if i get the chance to buy her. I have JB, Kron, Musa and i rarely play them (the game at all tbh) at all as well.

I'm a fully casual player. I mean, i'm 37 and i have a full time job. I not even have the time to play the game even if i would want to. I almost only play at weekends. In the last more than 3,5 years i only played 3k games. Not even 1k per year. Thats why i would not only wanted to get Missouri because of the name, but because of the help in credit earnings. For a casual player like me, it would have been a really BIG help :)

I feel that i've been slapped in the face tbh :D I've waited for this since i realised my mistake, about at the end of 2018. And now it feels like a face slap with a fish :D "Here you go: Missouri! Buuuuuuut it's actually not that one..."
I've never thought that i will say this ever but: It would be better FOR ME that it stays unreachable, than it returns as any other plain t9 prem ship. :Smile_sad:

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HART]
[HART]
Players
43 posts

I would have liked the OLD Missouri. Guess now I'll be sticking with good old reliable Iowa! Oh while I'm on a quick question. Can anyone explain the planned new secondary battery mechanic? Sorry but I cannot figure (feeble minded) if it is a buff back towards what we have lost, or a further nerf. It seems overly complex. Do we start at the current level 35% plus the 10% and work up towards 50% or is it starting at a ludicrous 10% and work up over the best part of a minutes continual firing (that would truly kill them) Why can't WG simply restore what they ruined! :Smile-angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
226 posts
5 hours ago, DarthDon49 said:

I'm another player that will stop when subs are in regular matches. I'll put this profile up for sale at that point.:Smile-angry:

It's a buyers' market already. Subs will just inflate the value even more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[O-V]
Players
390 posts
16,087 battles

You could gold plate the mighty mo put 2 gold type 59s on it and i still wouldn't give your company money 

 

You can't be trusted to take the game in the direction i would like ...there for its going to be free to play ALL DAY 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
161 posts
8,250 battles

This resulted in some Captains playing flag_USA_dd9fc06d19a8638f4077ab2fe200d22 premium_1d0cabf1997104fd727039ab9c098192IX Missouri more often than they planned.

 

And who are these people WG??? They spoiled everything... Was it me too???

 

I have played Mighty Mo 74 times as wows says... how many times it was unplanned??? How should I avoid to play unplaned games??? Or could you show to me how does look proper plan??? Where I have to post my plan??? Who must be aware of it???

:Smile-angry:

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
312 posts
15,158 battles

I was about to request a refund for my Missouri but luckily enough, WG thought about this possibility from all Missouri owners.

 

So my suggesetion would be to rename new 10.7 Missouri to Missouri(B) (for Bargain)

 

Anyway, its a tier 9 BB with radar, not great armor, long range guns. Still playable and useful in Ranked.

 

 

Ps, Put Enterprise back on sale.

Im so furious on myself that i was 1 click away from buying it for 34 and back then i thought, nah, this time i need my money, i will buy it after my holidays. 3 days later it was removed from sales without notice.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-BES-]
Players
83 posts
17,137 battles

Why dont you just bring another Iowa class battleship into the game?  Now there is confusion about new and old Missouri and you practicaly spit into the face of the proud owners of that ship who play your game for many years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ROUGH]
Players
6 posts
11,987 battles
5 hours ago, LonesomePolecat said:

Some. And that's the thing. Some won't buy an many WILL buy! WG don't care about "some" ppl they care about the newbies willing to play and pay.(!) And there's a lot of ppl out there wanting Mo, willing to pay cash&doubloons for her regardless what actions taken with her. Also, not everyone buying ships in this game based on credit, xp or whatever profitability, they buying names! Historic names. Just look at Belfast, how ppl badly wanted (what actually happened is a diff story). But is Belfast (VII) still as she was before? Off course not, she is quite power crept. But still ppl was willing to pay 50-100 quid for her. not long ago!   So lets not underestimate ppl desires for a pixel ship :)   

I am well aware of that, no need to type your fingers off for nothing :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
22 posts
10,840 battles

Never mind Missouri , if you are going to buff secondaries on BBs please bring our secondary builds back on Seigfried and Agir ( amongst others ) instead of the stupid torpedo skills for cruisers

 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[H-O-E]
Players
59 posts
8,431 battles

@YabbaCoe If it's not a nerf indeed, one of the best way to reassure us would be to have camo flags and signals applied to this specific mission. That way we could be sure that the credit earned would stay the same. I doubt it's credit printing abilities are a real problem nowadays given how far between they are in battle. Got mine back in the days it was available for Free Xp, then you saw many of them. But not anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
183 posts
13,263 battles

You wouldn't remove the special credit mission after a while, right WG? Riiiiight, WH? Because I can remember another set of missions that used to be permanent but removed for more profits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,440 battles
18 hours ago, Amaha said:

Want to buy Missouri for her original price (750.000 Free EXP)!

Unfortunately that won't be possible anymore.

 

15 hours ago, Iniour said:

Will the Missouri be available for other ressources as well?

Most likely not for now. It will be available for doubloons. 

 

11 hours ago, Admirality said:

This resulted in some Captains playing flag_USA_dd9fc06d19a8638f4077ab2fe200d22 premium_1d0cabf1997104fd727039ab9c098192IX Missouri more often than they planned.

 

And who are these people WG??? They spoiled everything... Was it me too???

 

I have played Mighty Mo 74 times as wows says... how many times it was unplanned??? How should I avoid to play unplaned games??? Or could you show to me how does look proper plan??? Where I have to post my plan??? Who must be aware of it???

:Smile-angry:

 

During the time, when she was available for purchase, we had quite plenty battles with several Missouris per team. And overpopulation of certain ships is not really good. Basically the same happened with Jean Bart and Smolensk. We would like to have battles with more variety of setups. That is why some ships are removed from sales because of their huge popularity in battles. 

 

1 hour ago, Arnianor said:

@YabbaCoe If it's not a nerf indeed, one of the best way to reassure us would be to have camo flags and signals applied to this specific mission. That way we could be sure that the credit earned would stay the same. I doubt it's credit printing abilities are a real problem nowadays given how far between they are in battle. Got mine back in the days it was available for Free Xp, then you saw many of them. But not anymore.

I still haven't received an answer for my question about that mission and "how much the nerf would be". But imo it should consider other factors, so this mission should give more credits in percentage, than what the nerf of base income would be. 

 

34 minutes ago, Battleship_Nagato said:

You wouldn't remove the special credit mission after a while, right WG? Riiiiight, WH? Because I can remember another set of missions that used to be permanent but removed for more profits.

This mission should be permanent.

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BLING]
[BLING]
Players
2,468 posts
25,182 battles
20 hours ago, The_EURL_Guy said:

Submarines slink stealthily into Ranked Battles, Early Access to Dutch cruisers continues, and a new Dockyard is ready to welcome you!


Read it on the portal

So basically @YabbaCoe WG takes in a rare ship so it wont be rare anymore and put it up for sale WG and sorry I say that, but it's a mockery of those who have toiled and towed to get it for free XP. Is it greed on the part of WGs side since they do that ??

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,440 battles
8 minutes ago, Cammo1962 said:

So basically @YabbaCoe WG takes in a rare ship so it wont be rare anymore and put it up for sale WG and sorry I say that, but it's a mockery of those who have toiled and towed to get it for free XP. Is it greed on the part of WGs side since they do that ??

True is, that with this decision we basically removed the rarity status from the ship. But still, mostly it is meant to give the option for those, who desire to have this ship, to have the chance to have it. Especially when we are speaking here about one of the most legendary ships ever built. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
183 posts
13,263 battles
12 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

This mission should be permanent.

 

The special module missions were supposed to be permanent too. What makes this one different? Who is to say it won't be removed after a year?

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BLING]
[BLING]
Players
2,468 posts
25,182 battles
1 minute ago, YabbaCoe said:

True is, that with this decision we basically removed the rarity status from the ship. But still, mostly it is meant to give the option for those, who desire to have this ship, to have the chance to have it. Especially when we are speaking here about one of the most legendary ships ever built. 

You are still mockerying people that have grinded their way in free XP to get that ship (I was lucky to get the ship in a Santa Crate after it was removed). And i still haved got the answer is it greed from WGs since they does this @YabbaCoe because in my eyes it seems and looks like greed from WGs side ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BLEZO]
Players
342 posts
17,031 battles
16 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

True is, that with this decision we basically removed the rarity status from the ship. But still, mostly it is meant to give the option for those, who desire to have this ship, to have the chance to have it. Especially when we are speaking here about one of the most legendary ships ever built. 

NO, NO CHANGE TO MISSOURI.

Do FRIESLAND way using a sister ship.

Or made a new MISSOURI(1945) for example to be on sale.

 

A BIG NO to any changes on MISSOURI.

 

Best regards.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×