Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Alex_steel_45

Soviet aircraft carriers branch

26 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
27 posts
9,545 battles

What the point make new  branch if all existed branches unplayable? 
CV ammunition super expensive, any BB have that expensive shells.
CV  planes weak, CV can't make enough damage.
After all these you create new MORE USELESS BRANCH !!! Why?
First correct and buff what we have, add more HP for planes, reduce cost of all planes and make aiming fast and easy.
Only then add new branch!

THX.

  • Funny 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,711 posts
12,557 battles
Just now, Alex_steel_45 said:

What the point make new  branch if all existed branches unplayable

Stopped reading. 

Verdict: typical case of GiddusGuddus. 

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EST]
[EST]
Players
1,859 posts
35,597 battles
5 minutes ago, GarrusBrutus said:

GiddusGuddus

Is this your younger relative?:cap_haloween:

  • Funny 16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMM]
[BBMM]
Players
8,818 posts
17,199 battles
1 hour ago, GarrusBrutus said:

Stopped reading. 

Verdict: typical case of GiddusGuddus. 

I thought Minimus Dickus but WTF do I know. :Smile_veryhappy:

  • Funny 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Privateer
791 posts
15,219 battles
2 hours ago, Alex_steel_45 said:

What the point make new  branch if all existed branches unplayable? CV ammunition super expensive, any BB have that expensive shells. CV  planes weak, CV can't make enough damage.

I stopped reading your tirade at this point and took a look at your stats. You have a few dozen games in the post-rework CV's, and you are correct when you imply that they didn't go well. 

 

If you like the post-rework CV gameplay, stick to one of for at least a few dozen matches -- maybe even a hundred. Work on it and try to get good. Ranger is great first CV. 

 

Plenty of players have got the current CV's to work great. They routinely deal out more damage than in BB's of the same tier. 

 

And don't stress about a new CV line being introduced. It's not really something for a CV beginner like yourself. The Russian CV's are something for us, who have played hundreds or even thousands of games in the CV's. We also deserve new content. 

  • Cool 2
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NECRO]
Players
6,381 posts
Vor 6 Stunden, Alex_steel_45 sagte:

First correct and buff what we have, add more HP for planes, reduce cost of all planes and make aiming fast and easy.

At that point, I would create an account for my pet rats to play CV.

  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,032 posts
19,168 battles
7 hours ago, GarrusBrutus said:

Stopped reading. 

Verdict: typical case of GiddusGuddus. 

remember when the forum claimed that CVs are broken even in the hands of potats? Now they need to git gud too X_X

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Beta Tester
2,514 posts
20,269 battles
8 hours ago, Alex_steel_45 said:

What the point make new  branch if all existed branches unplayable? 
CV ammunition super expensive, any BB have that expensive shells.
CV  planes weak, CV can't make enough damage.
After all these you create new MORE USELESS BRANCH !!! Why?
First correct and buff what we have, add more HP for planes, reduce cost of all planes and make aiming fast and easy.
Only then add new branch!

THX.

Well on my part pls make my curserrs inmortal. thnx. 

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OCTO]
Players
1,268 posts
36,636 battles

On another topic, has the main Soviet CV thread been nuked and contributors sent to Gulag? It is early morning, but I can't find it?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
4,528 posts
1 hour ago, Yosha_nai said:

remember when the forum claimed that CVs are broken even in the hands of potats? Now they need to git gud too X_X

Meanwhile at WG HQ: CV skillgap fixed.

 

On a serious note though: it's not only the damage. You need to take spotting into account as well.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,032 posts
19,168 battles
1 minute ago, 159Hunter said:

Meanwhile at WG HQ: CV skillgap fixed.

 

On a serious note though: it's not only the damage. You need to take spotting into account as well.

Yeah I know I know. spotting. 8s the only reason. why FDR was competitive in CBs too xD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,025 posts
13,785 battles
8 hours ago, BLUB__BLUB said:

I thought Minimus Dickus but WTF do I know. :Smile_veryhappy:

EzDEXfYSUOyk.gif

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,248 posts
17,480 battles
10 minuti fa, Yosha_nai ha scritto:

Yeah I know I know. spotting. 8s the only reason. why FDR was competitive in CBs too xD 

"My PlaNeS ArE InVulNerAblE SO I LikE ThiZ Cv!"

ok i wont make anyone laugh with this, have a great day everyone tbh

  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
6,636 posts
24,864 battles
16 hours ago, asalonen said:

I stopped reading your tirade at this point and took a look at your stats. You have a few dozen games in the post-rework CV's, and you are correct when you imply that they didn't go well. 

 

If you like the post-rework CV gameplay, stick to one of for at least a few dozen matches -- maybe even a hundred. Work on it and try to get good. Ranger is great first CV. 

 

Plenty of players have got the current CV's to work great. They routinely deal out more damage than in BB's of the same tier. 

 

And don't stress about a new CV line being introduced. It's not really something for a CV beginner like yourself. The Russian CV's are something for us, who have played hundreds or even thousands of games in the CV's. We also deserve new content. 

 

Your nearly got me with Your post, but really f*cked it all up with the bolded part. :Smile_trollface:

 

12 hours ago, Yosha_nai said:

remember when the forum claimed that CVs are broken even in the hands of potats? Now they need to git gud too X_X

 

They are. But some potatoes are so bad, that even broken ships don't work for them. Not even Smolensk... or Kamikaze... or Krispy Kreme... :Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
6,636 posts
On 6/19/2021 at 7:47 AM, Yosha_nai said:

remember when the forum claimed that CVs are broken even in the hands of potats? Now they need to git gud too X_X

Broken. Yep. OP? Nope. You dissapoint. Sad am I.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3 posts
3,197 battles

Ideas for new ships !!!

You could add Romanian ships. You have plenty of ships to choose like: Destroyer Regele Ferdinand(King Ferdinand), Destroyer Regina Maria(Queen Mary), Destroyer Mărășești, Destroyer Mărăști, the Submarine Delfinul( the Dolphin) which sunk Destroyer Moskva(Moscow) and damaged really bad cruisers Harkov and Voroshilov in the raid on Constanta, Submarine Rechinul(the Shark) or Submarine Marsuinul( the Porpoise). You could add them like premium ships to make money or tech tree ships. It would be something new, a great update. Many people would like it and you will have a huge success !

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts
5 minutes ago, FieFaFoo said:

More ship lines = more variation in team build ups. I just hope they aren't OP.

 

Yes... for the most part. But if Soviet paper CV's bring into this game variation in the form of flying Katyusha batteries... I'd rather forgo that particular bit of variation... :cap_yes:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,533 posts
2 hours ago, Nava_Regala said:

Ideas for new ships !!!

You could add Romanian ships. You have plenty of ships to choose like: Destroyer Regele Ferdinand(King Ferdinand), Destroyer Regina Maria(Queen Mary), Destroyer Mărășești, Destroyer Mărăști, the Submarine Delfinul( the Dolphin) which sunk Destroyer Moskva(Moscow) and damaged really bad cruisers Harkov and Voroshilov in the raid on Constanta, Submarine Rechinul(the Shark) or Submarine Marsuinul( the Porpoise). You could add them like premium ships to make money or tech tree ships. It would be something new, a great update. Many people would like it and you will have a huge success !

WG impression

 

WG (when looking at this): Idea for new ships (oh god, not this bs again) You could add romanian ships (this community is so tragic) 

You have plenty of ships to choose like: Destroyer eoifewodfhewivdiewdfiew, (confused unga bunga) 

(nope never heard of them, why do they keep giving us toilet paper for feedback) 

 

(anyway, lets add nuclear homing torpedoes and Swiss BB line coz they are atleast something we know of)

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts
1 hour ago, totally_potato said:

WG impression

 

WG (when looking at this): Idea for new ships (oh god, not this bs again) You could add romanian ships (this community is so tragic) 

You have plenty of ships to choose like: Destroyer eoifewodfhewivdiewdfiew, (confused unga bunga) 

(nope never heard of them, why do they keep giving us toilet paper for feedback) 

 

(anyway, lets add nuclear homing torpedoes and Swiss BB line coz they are atleast something we know of)

 

Do not joke about the Swiss Navy, it's no laughing matter! :Smile_ohmy:

 

I have a distant cousin who spent 900 days in Stalin's prison because he was suspected for having spied for the Swiss Navy. They never could find evidence, though... I suspect that means evidence of any Swiss Navy.. but in the end they had to let him go. He was formally rehabilited only posthumously in 1991.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,533 posts
15 hours ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

 

Do not joke about the Swiss Navy, it's no laughing matter! :Smile_ohmy:

 

I have a distant cousin who spent 900 days in Stalin's prison because he was suspected for having spied for the Swiss Navy. They never could find evidence, though... I suspect that means evidence of any Swiss Navy.. but in the end they had to let him go. He was formally rehabilited only posthumously in 1991.

image.jpeg.8914f9c62978d691b2ac931d5ad1caac.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
472 posts
20,205 battles
16 hours ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

 

Do not joke about the Swiss Navy, it's no laughing matter! :Smile_ohmy:

 

I have a distant cousin who spent 900 days in Stalin's prison because he was suspected for having spied for the Swiss Navy. They never could find evidence, though... I suspect that means evidence of any Swiss Navy.. but in the end they had to let him go. He was formally rehabilited only posthumously in 1991.

While the Swiss navy is indeed formidable they can't compare to the glorious Russian Navy :

 

 

What I want to know is when do we get fishing boats in WOWS to fight against, my Moskva needs targets!!

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×