Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Hugh_Ruka

PSA: WG now deciding which ship can be nerfed on a whim

53 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[OGHF2]
Players
4,054 posts
5,642 battles

Hello Captains,

 

If you have not noticed, WG announced that the Kirov is now subject to future changes: https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/sales-and-events/premium-shop-0103-festive-bundles/

 

Quote

If deemed necessary, balance changes may be applied to flag_Russia_6ce701e1c2f2ac3909a68a0a7b23premium_1114542bcd311c388080eea3a4d54a7eV Kirov.

 

This basically means that they can now decide that ANY premium or other ship can be changed as long as they do a new availability campaign for it. The Kirov was changed to a premium with the Russian cruiser line split and many of us got it that way. Now it was announced that the ship can be changed simply because WG has added a new availability campaign for it.

 

Now imagine they will announce an event (Dockyard, Campaign, whatever) for some other premium ship and state the same sentence in the footnotes (Alaska as example ??).

 

For myself, I won't ever buy a premium for money again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SVX]
Players
1,850 posts
20,871 battles

this is not new news, check the last like 10 premiums all have that disclaimer. also kirov is a old tech three ship so who cares ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,131 battles

Thank you for noticing what game designers can do with their own game :cap_like:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 3
  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,387 posts
12,045 battles
Just now, ColonelPete said:

Thank you for noticing what game designers can do with their own game :cap_like:

You are absolutely right, of course.

 

 

Then let's do what we can do: not one cent.

  • Cool 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Beta Tester
2,514 posts
20,220 battles

Just dont buy prem ship for cash. Use resource ships or dooblons for free from game, but do not invest cash in wg. simple. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[0KILL]
Players
444 posts

Stalingrad (twice in a row), Thunderer, Smolensk, Ohio (with the secondary battery rework) and other premiums ship have been nerfed...so..not surprised!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
5,868 posts

Isn't the thing also available for coal? So you're complaining about an old tech tree ship, that every got for free, can get for free a second time and can get it with coal being nerfable.....I mean...c'mon.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EST]
[EST]
Players
1,859 posts
35,493 battles
25 minutes ago, Hugh_Ruka said:

If deemed necessary, balance changes may be applied to flag_Russia_6ce701e1c2f2ac3909a68a0a7b23premium_1114542bcd311c388080eea3a4d54a7eV Kirov.

I got my Kirov without that warning, so mine wont be nerfed/buffed?:Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
Players
2,626 posts
18,649 battles

You would think that people would be happy, honestly, that they are prepared to apply balance fixes even to prems or whatever if need be, and not just silver ships. 

WG has pushed a lot of crappy decisions, but this isn't one of them. 

 

In other, related news, the ''WoWs is pay2win'' camp is getting torpedoed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Beta Tester
2,514 posts
20,220 battles
3 minutes ago, Miragetank90 said:

You would think that people would be happy, honestly, that they are prepared to apply balance fixes even to prems or whatever if need be, and not just silver ships. 

WG has pushed a lot of crappy decisions, but this isn't one of them. 

 

In other, related news, the ''WoWs is pay2win'' camp is getting torpedoed. 

You do belive, in WG "balancing" as a way of fixing problemes? camone :d 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,978 posts

essentially you buy an option to test this ship as lesta themselves is not able to do that ... 

to call this cool ... lol

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
130 posts
570 battles

WG introduces the ship well, then you buy it, then they trash the ship with the excuse of a change in balance, then they take out another ship and make you buy it again and turn it into garbage again.:cap_money:

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
5,868 posts
1 minute ago, YILDIRIM39 said:

WG introduces the ship well, then you buy it, then they trash the ship with the excuse of a change in balance, then they take out another ship and make you buy it again and turn it into garbage again.:cap_money:

Why would you pay for a free ship

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OGHF2]
Players
4,054 posts
5,642 battles
29 minutes ago, Profilus said:

I got my Kirov without that warning, so mine wont be nerfed/buffed?:Smile_trollface:

That's exactly the point I was trying to make. I got mine the same way, there was no warning attached ...

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
130 posts
570 battles
1 dakika önce, SV_Kompresor dedi:

Neden bedava bir gemi için para ödüyorsun

I'm not talking about this ship, I said about other ships, this ship can now be obtained for free thanks to missions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OGHF2]
Players
4,054 posts
5,642 battles
46 minutes ago, SV_Kompresor said:

Isn't the thing also available for coal?

Yes it is. And without the warning in Armory ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,013 battles
Just now, Hugh_Ruka said:

That's exactly the point I was trying to make. I got mine the same way, there was no warning attached ...

 

Well, when i got mine, it was subject to nerfs and buffs, so where does that leave us?

I mean, i got it as a techtree ship, and techtree ships could always get buffed/nerfed without any extra warning.

 

WG should just say, that ships, which are only obtainable with ingame resources (so no direct cash or doubloons) are subject to change - case closed. Btw was Kirov even in sale before this? That might be the reason for the disclaimer.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
14 minutes ago, Miragetank90 said:

You would think that people would be happy, honestly, that they are prepared to apply balance fixes even to prems or whatever if need be, and not just silver ships. 

WG has pushed a lot of crappy decisions, but this isn't one of them. 

 

In other, related news, the ''WoWs is pay2win'' camp is getting torpedoed. 

Or introduce oh so slightly balans new premium, conveniently of the same tier as new Ranked/CB season, let it earn money and salt, only to nerf it once "enough data is collected", preferably once mentioned Ranked/CB ends:cap_tea:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
280 posts
586 battles
Vor 1 Stunde, Hugh_Ruka sagte:

This basically means that they can now decide that ANY premium or other ship can be changed 

finally:cap_like:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OGHF2]
Players
4,054 posts
5,642 battles
2 minutes ago, DFens_666 said:

 

Well, when i got mine, it was subject to nerfs and buffs, so where does that leave us?

I mean, i got it as a techtree ship, and techtree ships could always get buffed/nerfed without any extra warning.

 

WG should just say, that ships, which are only obtainable with ingame resources (so no direct cash or doubloons) are subject to change - case closed. Btw was Kirov even in sale before this? That might be the reason for the disclaimer.

The uncertainity is this:

 

We have 2 classes of "premium" ships: 1. full gold icon, 2. Gold/silver icon. The first one are the "original" premiums. Those were never subject to nerfs. The second one are "special" ships like Stalingrad etc, that were available for ingame resources and actually were never treated as full premiums by WG (nerf armor).

 

Kirov has the "premium" icon. Yes it was a techtree ship and was never available for doubloons as far as I can recall. However if you compare Kirov and Moskva, those ships got the exact same treatment but have different icons. Neither has the warning in Armory.

 

Where I am getting at: HOW can we trust a ship will not be nerfed when we buy it with cash when WG can decide to throw them into Armory for coal (Aigle, Blyska, Anshan as examples), and later slap the nerf label on them when convenient ?

 

WG needs to state a clear policy somewhere for us to read and stick to it ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,131 battles
7 minutes ago, Hugh_Ruka said:

WG needs to state a clear policy somewhere for us to read and stick to it ....

"we ... can update or change Virtual Goods available for purchase at any time"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,013 battles
Just now, Hugh_Ruka said:

Where I am getting at: HOW can we trust a ship will not be nerfed when we buy it with cash when WG can decide to throw them into Armory for coal (Aigle, Blyska, Anshan as examples), and later slap the nerf label on them when convenient ? 

 

Thats why i was wondering, if Kirov was in the shop prior to this? If it wasnt, id personaly be fine with it. Because then it was like this:

- Techtree ship: Always subject to change

- Coal ship only: I guess technically subject to change, same as any other ship only available for coal/steel, but usually it was restricted to TX ships

- Now available for cash: So they added the disclaimer that its subject to change

To me, that would be ok. If it was available for money prior to this, then its not ok.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,505 posts
40,353 battles
1 hour ago, ColonelPete said:

"we ... can update or change Virtual Goods available for purchase at any time"

I read that somewhere recently. Is it in the ToS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,131 battles
1 minute ago, VIadoCro said:

I read that somewhere recently. Is it in the ToS?

Yepp, at least since 2016, probably longer.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EST]
[EST]
Players
1,859 posts
35,493 battles
1 hour ago, Miragetank90 said:

You would think that people would be happy, honestly, that they are prepared to apply balance fixes even to prems or whatever if need be, and not just silver ships. 

WG has pushed a lot of crappy decisions, but this isn't one of them. 

The problem is, that they still will release OP crap, but now they have excuse to "balance them later".

They should balance everything we have rigjt now and not release new OP crap, i would be ok with that.

But selling even temporary powercreep makes alot of money...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×