Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Adm_Andre

Farewell historical 6x1 203mm Furutaka

31 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
280 posts
586 battles

Farewell historical 6x1 203mm Furutaka :Smile_sad:

 

You teached me to appreciate the slow reload, AP citadels pen over to these fast firing yankies.

 

"Master Furataka and enjoy than Myoko, Mogami (, Ibuki) and Zao"

 

Bye bye

 

shot-21_04.12_23_05.37-0449_.thumb.jpg.83d0b1f97c29a12d3c7e83e5e3c39bb5.jpgshot-21_04.12_23_06.11-0630_.thumb.jpg.588e3b95c83766a51318346e9430294c.jpgshot-21_04.12_23_06.48-0931_.thumb.jpg.b88879d3651623d043c94e573dd62956.jpg

  • Cool 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SINT]
Players
1,639 posts
31,173 battles

Historical it would have been 6x1 200 mm. She only got the 203’s after upgrading the guns to 3x2. But even taking into account the sad fact that yet another hull type is being deleted the 3x2 gun setup is way superior.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,664 battles
20 minutes ago, rinkula_go said:

?

 

Where is Furutaka going?

Presumably a reference to this:

 

image.thumb.png.4fdc33f8e497c1640a017003842cf089.png

 

(Part of the modules changes bit of the notes for the upcoming patch).

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LAFIE]
Beta Tester
7,707 posts
7,856 battles
45 minutes ago, Adm_Andre said:

Farewell historical 6x1 203mm Furutaka :Smile_sad:

Wrong, historically Furutaka never had 6X1 203mm guns. She had 6X1 200mm guns, she only got the 203's with the refit to 3x2.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LAFIE]
Beta Tester
7,707 posts
7,856 battles

Semi related note, anyone else think they may be about to give the Fletcher and Chung Mu the same A-hulls? Here's a pair of screencaps that illustrate the (minor, but they are there) differences between the two.

shot-21.04.12_22.39.59-0370.jpg

shot-21.04.12_22.40.30-0589.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,532 posts
29,240 battles
Vor 16 Minuten, lafeel sagte:

Semi related note, anyone else think they may be about to give the Fletcher and Chung Mu the same A-hulls? Here's a pair of screencaps that illustrate the (minor, but they are there) differences between the two.

Pshshsht don't give them ideas, or we end up with a hydro Fushun/Anshan!1

 

Anshan_Hydro.jpg

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,025 posts
13,785 battles

You will be missed my old friend... :'(

 

You dared to be different and I liked you for it. Sleep well.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,588 posts
6,830 battles
10 ore fa, Adm_Andre ha scritto:

 historical 6x1

So what? both configurations are historical

a06aad56.jpg

 

plus Kongo, Fuso, Nagato and Amagi have had their OG stock hulls removed for a while by now (they made Mutsu and Ashitaka out of them; I'm still waiting for Yamashiro) but anyway, it's not the first time that a stock hull get removed and replaed with one that looks very similar to the last hull. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-TPF-]
Players
6,382 posts
26,856 battles
8 hours ago, Sweedish_Gunner said:

Incoming premium IJN Kako with the pre-refit armament. 

Great if so, if she comes with a choice of heavy torpedo load and 200mm guns or the current B hull Furutaka that would be fun (and much better than the other Japanese Tier V Prem cruiser).

 

Sad about the Furry Taco, though - I still play the B hull as it's such a distinctive ship. Will sell it once the changes hit and it becomes a weaker Aoba. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CR33D]
[CR33D]
Players
3,842 posts
38,982 battles
9 hours ago, lafeel said:

Semi related note, anyone else think they may be about to give the Fletcher and Chung Mu the same A-hulls? Here's a pair of screencaps that illustrate the (minor, but they are there) differences between the two.

shot-21.04.12_22.39.59-0370.jpg

shot-21.04.12_22.40.30-0589.jpg

 

No. During one of the Q&A sessions during the last year, it was said that all US DDs should get new models and that work on them is in quite advanced phase. But nothing more was said about this since then. Fletcher model represent original design for the class, with rounded bridge while Chung Mu is representing both later version of the Fletcher with square bridge but also the post war modernization (closed bridge and new radar). So they would not share same A hull. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
4 minutes ago, invicta2012 said:

Great if so, if she comes with a choice of heavy torpedo load and 200mm guns or the current B hull Furutaka that would be fun (and much better than the other Japanese Tier V Prem cruiser).

 

Sad about the Furry Taco, though - I still play the B hull as it's such a distinctive ship. Will sell it once the changes hit and it becomes a weaker Aoba. 

Afaik initial Furutaka class had fixed torpedo tubes in the hull, only after refit they got "normal" torpedo launchers on the deck?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-TPF-]
Players
6,382 posts
26,856 battles
15 minutes ago, Panocek said:

Afaik initial Furutaka class had fixed torpedo tubes in the hull, only after refit they got "normal" torpedo launchers on the deck?

I think the appeal for me is more about the principal aesthetics of this particular design than it is about historical exactitude; I know WG doesn't want to model fixed tubes so deck mounted is fine, as it is on the current Furutaka A/B hulls. From a gameplay PoV I think Kako, with 6 x 2 torpedo tubes (even with limited traverse), would make a better balanced example of the Japanese "Torpedo Cruiser" type than than Yahagi does, it's just that bit more durable, and with the slow gun reload it is already pretty well balanced. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SINT]
Players
1,639 posts
31,173 battles
42 minutes ago, wot_2016_gunner said:

So what? both configurations are historical

a06aad56.jpg

plus Kongo, Fuso, Nagato and Amagi have had their OG stock hulls removed for a while by now (they made Mutsu and Ashitaka out of them; I'm still waiting for Yamashiro) but anyway, it's not the first time that a stock hull get removed and replaed with one that looks very similar to the last hull. 

Did the old US battleships not have original A hulls as well with those distinctive round wire cage masts?

 

The grind of the old stock hulls was really a pain and required self control regarding the use of your FXP ( at that time super camo’s and flags were not that much around and FXP was more scarce) But it had its flavor.

 

Sad to see it all go away.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,588 posts
6,830 battles
Proprio ora, Jvd2000 ha scritto:

Did the old US battleships not have original A hulls as well with those distinctive round wire cage masts?

Yes, Stock hull Colorado became W.Virginia 1941; i wanted to say in the post, i then i decided not to. Not sure about the other US BBs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
Players
7,047 posts
32,326 battles
9 hours ago, Sweedish_Gunner said:

Incoming premium IJN Kako with the pre-refit armament. 

Yeah, but one tier lower and "balanced" so that it's the worst T4 cruiser in the game.

Same goes for A hull Bayern, it will be the  Baden at T5 with 45s reload for "balance".

 

WG tossed quality and creativity away long ago.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts

@Panocek My trusty source tells me that:

 

"Bei Umbau Ersatz der Hauptartillerie durch neuen Geschütztyp, Verlagerund der Torpedorohre von Haupt- auf Oberdeck, Anbau von Torpedowülsten."

 

Furutaka was built as the first Washington Treaty based heavy cruiser in '22-26 getting a refit in 36-38 (Kako following in 37-39). As far as the historical main armament goes, if I'm reading this right, they went from 6 x 200 mm to 6 x 203 mm, both quick firing. For further details I need to go to the Wikipedia, because my trusty source is a little skimp on the details :Smile_hiding: neglecting to indicate that the catapult was not part of the original armament but added in 1933.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_cruiser_Furutaka

 

The diagrams I have show the original Furutaka with single turrets, and the refitted Kako with twin turrets. Wikipedia confirms that Furutaka was similarly re-armed.

 

@PaP_Mentoles WeeGreedy should not tamper with historical hulls/armament. (I also have the historical Bayern.)

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
1 minute ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

WeeGreedy should not tamper with historical hulls/armament

Don't worry, Zed 23 is already about to lose her 15cm guns on the altar of gimmick god :cap_tea:

  • Bad 1
  • Angry 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HOO]
Players
2,337 posts
4,238 battles
12 hours ago, Adm_Andre said:

Farewell historical 6x1 203mm Furutaka :Smile_sad:

 

You teached me to appreciate the slow reload, AP citadels pen over to these fast firing yankies.

 

"Master Furataka and enjoy than Myoko, Mogami (, Ibuki) and Zao"

 

Bye bye

 

shot-21_04.12_23_05.37-0449_.thumb.jpg.83d0b1f97c29a12d3c7e83e5e3c39bb5.jpgshot-21_04.12_23_06.11-0630_.thumb.jpg.588e3b95c83766a51318346e9430294c.jpgshot-21_04.12_23_06.48-0931_.thumb.jpg.b88879d3651623d043c94e573dd62956.jpg

Don't worry.

She will be back.

WG will copy paste the hull onto a new shiny premium boat for you to buy.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LAFIE]
Beta Tester
7,707 posts
7,856 battles
6 hours ago, fumtu said:

 

No. During one of the Q&A sessions during the last year, it was said that all US DDs should get new models and that work on them is in quite advanced phase. But nothing more was said about this since then. Fletcher model represent original design for the class, with rounded bridge while Chung Mu is representing both later version of the Fletcher with square bridge but also the post war modernization (closed bridge and new radar). So they would not share same A hull. 

Fair enough, but I was more referring to the bofors gun arrangement than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×