Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
leonport

Wg wants to tax DDs instead of BBs

7 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[TEPES]
Players
229 posts
5,040 battles

So after reading the devblog wg clearly said only BBs captains who learned deadeye skill will get a free reset which is OK.

Then they change fearless for DDs that had a huge downside which was -5% concelament to have no downside which means this skill now gives +1 Flak and -10% reload if your ship is spotted which means this is now a mandatory skill for ships like halland smaland jutland and a lot other gunboat dds

 

Everybody thought wg would change deadeye then make us respecc all BBs who had it but the opposite happened and with Gun boat dds where wg made an underpowered skill then buffed it to a good skill.

This is so scummy wg, if you change a skill that affects half of the DDs in this game give us at least 1 free reset.

  • Cool 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
3,745 posts
15,129 battles
1 minute ago, leonport said:

So after reading the devblog wg clearly said only BBs captains who learned deadeye skill will get a free reset which is OK.

Then they change fearless for DDs that had a huge downside which was -5% concelament to have no downside which means this skill now gives +1 Flak and -10% reload if your ship is spotted which means this is now a mandatory skill for ships like halland smaland jutland and a lot other gunboat dds

 

Everybody thought wg would change deadeye then make us respecc all BBs who had it but the opposite happened and with Gun boat dds where wg made an underpowered skill then buffed it to a good skill.

This is so scummy wg, if you change a skill that affects half of the DDs in this game give us at least 1 free reset.

This:

 

  • Cool 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KITEN]
Players
675 posts
15,901 battles

At this point im starting to think WG are simply vindictive. They seem to revel in people being upset with the game and just want to piss people off even further. :Smile-angry:

  • Cool 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,204 posts

you guys still dont get it  - most of the developers don't play their game and thus don't understand how a change of skill will affect game-play

and those who actually play the game are not invited to the table where decisions are made

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SOLOS]
Players
11 posts
8,523 battles
2 hours ago, JohnMac79 said:

At this point im starting to think WG are simply vindictive. They seem to revel in people being upset with the game and just want to piss people off even further. :Smile-angry:

There is a name for this kind of activity, which starts with T and ends with a verb involving a ball going down a hillside.

 

Kind of impressive how it's an actual company doing it, but then you remember they're russians and it makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
570 posts

No one ever accused WG of having intelligence, I doubt most of them could wipe their backsides, without looking up the instructions in a spreadsh!te and two reworks !

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,972 posts
5,228 battles

Should have been a (short?) free respec for everything - As they said they would in a devblog before the rework. Deadeye being removed changes optimal cruiser builds too, for example getting harder hitting AP and longer hydro makes sense on a hindenburg but in the deadeye "lets tickle eachother from 27km" meta - you played that thing with a derp build : Spotter plane + spotter skill + rangemod + DefAA + AA skills. Now you're half-stuck with derp builds, you can slot reload mod and hydro back because fun will be allowed again, but you're stuck with spotter and AA skills that are suboptimal.

The changes are not as intrusive as they were with 0.10.0 - most people wouldn't care too much, but a few days of free respec for people who min-max would have been the right thing to do.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×