Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
The_EURL_Guy

Yūdachi in the Armory and Premium Shop

30 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,440 battles
V 9. 4. 2021 v 22:44 S_h_i_v_a řekl/a:

Both Kidd and Bagration have heal, that's not on that list. And i compared Bagration to Tallin, thx to heal i can do more dmg before i go down. 

Hipper is played more AP, Mainz more HE,  and Mainz is more easier vs DDs. BTW i prefere Prinz Eugen to Hipper because of heal, like Bagration vs Tallin.

Cossack has one turret more than Lightning, and i prefere it's torp reload.

 

 About Bagration: i got him after seing a video of Carbine Carlito who liked it. 

 

So it really depends on each preference with that ship. Heal can make a difference, so does radar or other consumables.

Still those ships are slightly different to their tech tree counterparts, but just positive CC review is not making them much better. But some exceptions can be, unfortunately.

 

V 9. 4. 2021 v 23:22 WascallyWabbit řekl/a:

MMM....i remember a certain ship called HMS Hood, marketed as have AA rockets and excellent AA defence overall......you totally removed these powerful short range rockets. How is that not a nerf? And poor graf Zepp has had i think Sea Lord Mountbatten said 14 nerfs. How are these not direct nerfs. Escpecially the totally removal of HMS hoods unique rockets?

AA rockets on HMS Hood? Would you have any particular info about that?

CVs got completely changed during CV rework and if I am not mistaken, refund for them was offered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,440 battles
Před 22 hodinami Furiousacerimmer řekl/a:

 

Mentioned 10 times here which is referenced in the WoWs wiki:

https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/125603-premium-ship-preview-hms-hood/

Yes, this. Sorry, I completely forgot it was actually written there.

The thing is, even though it was written as somehow rockets, those were in fact gathered in normal AA.

But what is more important, they are still there:

shot-21.04.13_11.38.29-0448.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
WoWs Wiki Team, In AlfaTesters, Beta Tester, Quality Poster
2,314 posts
15,966 battles
15 hours ago, YabbaCoe said:

Yes, this. Sorry, I completely forgot it was actually written there.

The thing is, even though it was written as somehow rockets, those were in fact gathered in normal AA.

But what is more important, they are still there:

The issue is not that her rockets are missing. Hood, prior to the CV rework, had a unique version of the DFAA consumable that increased her rockets AA DPS by 2500% and lasted 60 seconds.

 

Since the rework she now has a regular consumable which is not remarkable in any way, despite her overall AA performance not really changing. This sadly nerfed Hoods self defense AA capabilities considerably, which was important because Hood is a large target. The fact that she even has DFAA is the only thing that even gives Hood comparable AA to other t7 BBs. Without DFAA active her AA is among the worst of any tier 7 BB and even with DFAA active there are tier 7 BBs that have better performance, the only real benefit she has is that DFAA increases the lethality of flak. It is difficult to describe Hood as having excellent AA as she was originally advertised.

 

Essentially, her AA has only been nerfed since the rework and no compensation has been put in place to emulate the effectiveness of the old DFAA or compensate for how her AA performance was homogenised when her DFAA consumable was standardised by the rework.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,440 battles
Před 6 hodinami Astolfo_Is_My_Waifu řekl/a:

The issue is not that her rockets are missing. Hood, prior to the CV rework, had a unique version of the DFAA consumable that increased her rockets AA DPS by 2500% and lasted 60 seconds.

 

Since the rework she now has a regular consumable which is not remarkable in any way, despite her overall AA performance not really changing. This sadly nerfed Hoods self defense AA capabilities considerably, which was important because Hood is a large target. The fact that she even has DFAA is the only thing that even gives Hood comparable AA to other t7 BBs. Without DFAA active her AA is among the worst of any tier 7 BB and even with DFAA active there are tier 7 BBs that have better performance, the only real benefit she has is that DFAA increases the lethality of flak. It is difficult to describe Hood as having excellent AA as she was originally advertised.

 

Essentially, her AA has only been nerfed since the rework and no compensation has been put in place to emulate the effectiveness of the old DFAA or compensate for how her AA performance was homogenised when her DFAA consumable was standardised by the rework.

Understood. Unfortunately with CW rework, also AAs were drastically changed, as well as DefAA. AA defences of all ships were recalculated and changed.

So Hood unfortunately lost it's unique AA self defence, actually also for example Yubari. Actually the biggest difference here is the DefAA, which was much more effective before the rework than it is now.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×