[RAIN] GarrusBrutus Players 3,711 posts 12,527 battles Report post #1 Posted April 7, 2021 Imagine going up against that with your mogami, lol 14 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-URK-] wot_2016_gunner Players 2,588 posts 6,830 battles Report post #2 Posted April 7, 2021 Yeah i just noticed the video from Wows gamer blog. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING WG?!!!!!!!! I am so tired of you. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[_PDW_] SobanRe Players 177 posts 17,735 battles Report post #3 Posted April 7, 2021 I hope that is joke, poor Odin getting powercrept by cruiser. 10 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RenamedUser_92906789 Players 5,828 posts Report post #4 Posted April 7, 2021 lul Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLUMR] Battleship_Nagato Beta Tester 183 posts 13,332 battles Report post #5 Posted April 7, 2021 "The no nerfing premiums policy changing has nothing to do with us releasing a very OP premium and nerf it down the line when the sales dwindle! Honest!" -WG, probably. 14 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OGHF2] Hugh_Ruka Players 4,054 posts 5,647 battles Report post #6 Posted April 7, 2021 late Aprils fool ? that's Alaska minus some 400HP and 2 guns ... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SHAD] Miscommunication_dept Players 5,512 posts 24,438 battles Report post #7 Posted April 7, 2021 Looks a bit powerful but also not worth buying if you already have Alaska? Don't forget, this ship will have the 'WG will nerf later' disclaimer on it. Doesn't matter how strong it is on release it could be nerfed to the ground a month later. 11 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DEH] hellhound666 Beta Tester 1,978 posts Report post #8 Posted April 7, 2021 19 minutes ago, gopher31 said: Looks a bit powerful but also not worth buying if you already have Alaska? Don't forget, this ship will have the 'WG will nerf later' disclaimer on it. Doesn't matter how strong it is on release it could be nerfed to the ground a month later. unfortunately, i will probably not be able to hold myself back ... fcking me and they haven't even solved the previous mess ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BYOB] Aragathor Players 7,047 posts 32,314 battles Report post #9 Posted April 7, 2021 WG in its pursuit of easy profit is reaching for the bottom of the toilet bowl, to sell polished brown stuff. Instead of really working they just copy paste ships now. Really classy WG. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NTT] arquata2019_ Players 2,248 posts 17,471 battles Report post #10 Posted April 7, 2021 May someone explain me it hasn't made it to the devblog? speaking of the ship herself, wow.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BYOB] Aragathor Players 7,047 posts 32,314 battles Report post #11 Posted April 7, 2021 3 minutes ago, arquata2019 said: May someone explain me it hasn't made it to the devblog? Wanna bet this will go up today? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CastorTolagi Players 1,450 posts Report post #12 Posted April 7, 2021 Vor 8 Minuten, arquata2019 sagte: May someone explain me it hasn't made it to the devblog? speaking of the ship herself, wow.. It's a new thing WG is trying where they give informations to CCs and others so they can be the first to show it. WoWS Gamer Blog and Searaptor were the first two to get stuff to show 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLITZ] principat121 Modder 6,023 posts 11,475 battles Report post #13 Posted April 7, 2021 WG: "Full steam ahead with the power creep train!" choo-choo 9 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PLCTS] FatherTorque [PLCTS] Players 150 posts 8,523 battles Report post #14 Posted April 7, 2021 This thing better have a worse Alaska armor scheme with a citadel above water line to compensate the ridiculous OPness of her released stats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TOHOU] Cirno9999 Players 488 posts Report post #15 Posted April 7, 2021 missing - torp protection also 12km smoke penalty , isnt that a bit much concealment is quite high - try to hide this thing somewhere xD AA seems way too weak to me probably i battle this thing in my scharn and win xD 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SWN] Asatori Players 377 posts 11,666 battles Report post #16 Posted April 7, 2021 25 minutes ago, CastorTolagi said: It's a new thing WG is trying where they give informations to CCs and others so they can be the first to show it. WoWS Gamer Blog and Searaptor were the first two to get stuff to show So they are abuseing CCs now to take all the crap coming their way because of lazy wargaming copy pasting.. I hope some of these CCs will show a bit of a spine and call these kind of ships out for what they are: lazy work by incompetent developers. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CastorTolagi Players 1,450 posts Report post #17 Posted April 7, 2021 Gerade eben, Asatori sagte: So they are abuseing CCs now to take all the crap coming their way because of lazy wargaming copy pasting.. I hope some of these CCs will show a bit of a spine and call these kind of ships out for what they are: lazy work by incompetent developers. https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/237119-even-by-wgs-standards-congress-is-embarrassingly-inaccurate/ 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-RNR-] Tanaka_15 Beta Tester 2,514 posts 20,267 battles Report post #18 Posted April 7, 2021 So what i get my Aoba into battle and I need to face USS Alaska? Camone, wg even you need to undrustand how bad this is :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SWN] Asatori Players 377 posts 11,666 battles Report post #19 Posted April 7, 2021 2 minutes ago, Tanaka_15 said: So what i get my Aoba into battle and I need to face USS Alaska? Camone, wg even you need to undrustand how bad this is :) I think the message they are communicating here is pretty clear You must PAY TO WIN 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLUMR] Battleship_Nagato Beta Tester 183 posts 13,332 battles Report post #20 Posted April 7, 2021 14 minutes ago, Cirno9999 said: missing - torp protection also 12km smoke penalty , isnt that a bit much concealment is quite high - try to hide this thing somewhere xD AA seems way too weak to me probably i battle this thing in my scharn and win xD It can get to 12.2 km detection, which is just slightly more than a Myoko I think. Unless it's sarcasm, then well played ice fairy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] YabbaCoe WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff 10,676 posts 5,441 battles Report post #21 Posted April 7, 2021 Před 30 minutami Asatori řekl/a: So they are abuseing CCs now to take all the crap coming their way because of lazy wargaming copy pasting.. I hope some of these CCs will show a bit of a spine and call these kind of ships out for what they are: lazy work by incompetent developers. It is not abusing CCs with this, on the contrary. CCs wanted to have the option to be the first to announce things and I am quite sure, that almost every single one would appreciate this. 10 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CATCH] CensorMeDaddyWG Beta Tester 390 posts 10,408 battles Report post #22 Posted April 7, 2021 36 minutes ago, Cirno9999 said: missing - torp protection also 12km smoke penalty , isnt that a bit much concealment is quite high - try to hide this thing somewhere xD AA seems way too weak to me probably i battle this thing in my scharn and win xD You only play co-op. It would be sad if that thing beat you in a Scharnhorst. Very sad. 2 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said: It is not abusing CCs with this, on the contrary. CCs wanted to have the option to be the first to announce things and I am quite sure, that almost every single one would appreciate this. Yeah, that's a nice sentiment. The truth is that you let multiple people leak the info in a desperate attempt not to have all the negative feedback for the lazy design of this ship be focussed in one thread. Let us know how this is going. Alaska at Tier VIII? Really? What's next, a Tier VIII F.D.R.? 9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DSNF] _Capt_Biggles_ Players 47 posts 17,018 battles Report post #23 Posted April 7, 2021 Wow... So many players who already seem to know exactly how this ship handles in game... So many who cannot figure out that ships of a particular class look the same and have similar equipment. So many people raging over something they would never of bought in the first place.. So many people who don't think wg should make any money and never buy anything yet expect huge rewards if they fail to log in once... 🤣 Far to many drama queen's crying over a video game... 🤣 I say bring it on. If your so upset over this then perhaps T3 coop would be the best place for you to play... But then you might face a T5 bot, how will you cope! 🤣 2 1 6 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-TPF-] invicta2012 Players 6,382 posts 26,850 battles Report post #24 Posted April 7, 2021 Hmm. Looks a bit OTT. Try making it have 3 x 2 305mm turrets on a 25 second reload, remove the radar completely and reduce the mid/light AA to 1941 levels (Dallas/Indi). Normalise the plating (including the deck) down to 27mm. You could buff the secondary 127mm range to BB levels and make a sort of mini-Georgia. (I quite like the idea of classifying BCs as cruisers....) 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SHAFT] viceadmiral123 Players 1,221 posts 29,485 battles Report post #25 Posted April 7, 2021 2 hours ago, SobanRe said: I hope that is joke, poor Odin getting powercrept by cruiser. Maybe Congress will get the 10k hp axe just before release and never get buffed again, who knows. Unless weegee has plans to put her in the Christmas scamboxes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites