Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
GarrusBrutus

Congress TVIII prem US cruiser

151 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
2,043 posts
3,825 battles

Yeah i just noticed the video from Wows gamer blog. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING WG?!!!!!!!! I am so:etc_swear: tired of you.

 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[_PDW_]
Players
78 posts
14,626 battles

I hope that is joke, poor Odin getting powercrept by cruiser.

  • Cool 10
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
167 posts
10,108 battles

"The no nerfing premiums policy changing has nothing to do with us releasing a very OP premium and nerf it down the line when the sales dwindle! Honest!"

 

-WG, probably.

  • Cool 14
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ALYEN]
Players
2,596 posts
4,358 battles

late Aprils fool ? that's Alaska minus some 400HP and 2 guns ...

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
3,773 posts
15,168 battles

Looks a bit powerful but also not worth buying if you already have Alaska?

 

Don't forget, this ship will have the 'WG will nerf later' disclaimer on it.

 

Doesn't matter how strong it is on release it could be nerfed to the ground a month later.

  • Cool 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,204 posts
19 minutes ago, gopher31 said:

Looks a bit powerful but also not worth buying if you already have Alaska?

 

Don't forget, this ship will have the 'WG will nerf later' disclaimer on it.

 

Doesn't matter how strong it is on release it could be nerfed to the ground a month later.

unfortunately, i will probably not be able to hold myself back ... fcking me

and they haven't even solved the previous mess ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
[BYOB]
Players
5,137 posts
22,935 battles

WG in its pursuit of easy profit is reaching for the bottom of the toilet bowl, to sell polished brown stuff. Instead of really working they just copy paste ships now.

Really classy WG.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,882 posts
9,489 battles

May someone explain me it hasn't made it to the devblog?

speaking of the ship herself, wow..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
[BYOB]
Players
5,137 posts
22,935 battles
3 minutes ago, arquata2019 said:

May someone explain me it hasn't made it to the devblog?

Wanna bet this will go up today?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,322 posts
Vor 8 Minuten, arquata2019 sagte:

May someone explain me it hasn't made it to the devblog?

speaking of the ship herself, wow..

It's a new thing WG is trying where they give informations to CCs and others so they can be the first to show it.

WoWS Gamer Blog and Searaptor were the first two to get stuff to show

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PLCTS]
Players
58 posts
5,373 battles

This thing better have a worse Alaska armor scheme with a citadel above water line to compensate the ridiculous OPness of her released stats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOHOU]
Players
312 posts
4,560 battles

missing - torp protection

also 12km smoke penalty , isnt that a bit much

concealment is quite high - try to hide this thing somewhere xD

AA seems way too weak to me

probably i battle this thing in my scharn and win xD

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SWN]
Players
188 posts
8,494 battles
25 minutes ago, CastorTolagi said:

It's a new thing WG is trying where they give informations to CCs and others so they can be the first to show it.

WoWS Gamer Blog and Searaptor were the first two to get stuff to show

 

So they are abuseing CCs now to take all the crap coming their way because of lazy wargaming copy pasting.. 


I hope some of these CCs will show a bit of a spine and call these kind of ships out for what they are: lazy work by incompetent developers. 

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,322 posts
Gerade eben, Asatori sagte:

So they are abuseing CCs now to take all the crap coming their way because of lazy wargaming copy pasting.. 


I hope some of these CCs will show a bit of a spine and call these kind of ships out for what they are: lazy work by incompetent developers. 

4.png.f3839670e3a36f8e99d472af37568b3c.png

 

https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/237119-even-by-wgs-standards-congress-is-embarrassingly-inaccurate/

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Beta Tester
1,408 posts
16,347 battles

So what i get my Aoba into battle and I need to face USS Alaska? Camone, wg even you need to undrustand how bad this is :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SWN]
Players
188 posts
8,494 battles
2 minutes ago, Tanaka_15 said:

So what i get my Aoba into battle and I need to face USS Alaska? Camone, wg even you need to undrustand how bad this is :) 


I think the message they are communicating here is pretty clear

You must PAY TO WIN

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
167 posts
10,108 battles
14 minutes ago, Cirno9999 said:

missing - torp protection

also 12km smoke penalty , isnt that a bit much

concealment is quite high - try to hide this thing somewhere xD

AA seems way too weak to me

probably i battle this thing in my scharn and win xD

It can get to 12.2 km detection, which is just slightly more than a Myoko I think.

 

Unless it's sarcasm, then well played ice fairy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff
6,732 posts
4,523 battles
Před 30 minutami Asatori řekl/a:

 

So they are abuseing CCs now to take all the crap coming their way because of lazy wargaming copy pasting.. 


I hope some of these CCs will show a bit of a spine and call these kind of ships out for what they are: lazy work by incompetent developers. 

It is not abusing CCs with this, on the contrary. CCs wanted to have the option to be the first to announce things and I am quite sure, that almost every single one would appreciate this.

  • Funny 10
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
365 posts
9,551 battles
36 minutes ago, Cirno9999 said:

missing - torp protection

also 12km smoke penalty , isnt that a bit much

concealment is quite high - try to hide this thing somewhere xD

AA seems way too weak to me

probably i battle this thing in my scharn and win xD

You only play co-op. It would be sad if that thing beat you in a Scharnhorst. Very sad. 

 

2 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

It is not abusing CCs with this, on the contrary. CCs wanted to have the option to be the first to announce things and I am quite sure, that almost every single one would appreciate this.

 

Yeah, that's a nice sentiment. The truth is that you let multiple people leak the info in a desperate attempt not to have all the negative feedback for the lazy design of this ship be focussed in one thread. Let us know how this is going. Alaska at Tier VIII? Really? What's next, a Tier VIII F.D.R.? 

  • Cool 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DSNF]
Players
44 posts
11,431 battles

Wow... So many players who already seem to know exactly how this ship handles in game... 

 

So many who cannot figure out that ships of a particular class look the same and have similar equipment. 

 

So many people raging over something they would never of bought in the first place.. 

 

So many people who don't think wg should make any money and never buy anything yet expect huge rewards if they fail to log in once... 🤣 

 

Far to many drama queen's crying over a video game... 🤣 

 

I say bring it on. If your so upset over this then perhaps T3 coop would be the best place for you to play... But then you might face a T5 bot, how will you cope! 🤣 

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1
  • Boring 6
  • Bad 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-TPF-]
Players
4,664 posts
19,119 battles

Hmm.  Looks a bit OTT. Try making it have 3 x 2 305mm turrets on a 25 second reload, remove the radar completely and reduce the mid/light AA to 1941 levels (Dallas/Indi). Normalise the plating (including the deck) down to 27mm. You could buff the secondary 127mm range to BB levels and make a sort of mini-Georgia. 

 

(I quite like the idea of classifying BCs as cruisers....)

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,202 posts
25,242 battles
2 hours ago, SobanRe said:

I hope that is joke, poor Odin getting powercrept by cruiser.

Maybe Congress will get the 10k hp axe just before release and never get buffed again, who knows.
Unless weegee has plans to put her in the Christmas scamboxes :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×