Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
I_Love_FDR

USS Alaska Perma Camos

32 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[SVX]
Players
1,850 posts
20,871 battles
1 minute ago, hellhound666 said:

alaska needs other type of love than another camo with the same stats - either fix it to an earlier state or compensate

compensation HAHAHAHAHAHA good 1 HAHAHAHAHHA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
4,528 posts
6 minutes ago, hellhound666 said:

alaska needs other type of love than another camo with the same stats - either fix it to an earlier state or compensate

But... why?

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[4_0_4]
Players
9,337 posts
16,243 battles

Asking for additional premium camos on a premium ship. So I have to agree with 159Hunter:

17 minutes ago, 159Hunter said:

But... why?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,978 posts
41 minutes ago, albin322 said:

compensation HAHAHAHAHAHA good 1 HAHAHAHAHHA

pretty obvious imo ... it's battle ability got severely reduced with skill rework, so compensation is in order

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SVX]
Players
1,850 posts
20,871 battles
9 minutes ago, hellhound666 said:

pretty obvious imo ... it's battle ability got severely reduced with skill rework, so compensation is in order

no ? they did not change the ship the changed the system and in the contract thing its says they keep the right to do that. but you can go go to a lawyer sure! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,978 posts
Just now, albin322 said:

no ? they did not change the ship the changed the system and in the contract thing its says they keep the right to do that. but you can go go to a lawyer sure! 

you can repeat their mantra till end of the days - they still changed the fcking prem ships and it would be an honorable thing to do. of course, it is funny to seek honour from Russia based company where fcking client till it moves is normal thing to do

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
4,528 posts
7 hours ago, hellhound666 said:

one can be helped only to so far ...

Or how not to answer my question.

 

But let me answer your request, Alaska always was far too strong for its tier. This global change will tone the ship down a notch. Which is good.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
5,868 posts
8 hours ago, hellhound666 said:

pretty obvious imo ... it's battle ability got severely reduced with skill rework, so compensation is in order

No it didn't. And even if it did, it would be well deserved considering she's already too strong compared to tech tree cruisers.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,978 posts

you dudes dont get the point - if it has to be nerfed then it is fine - just to the ones who wish compensation this should be offered. it does not matter if it was deserved or not or if smbdy thinks that it didn't get nerfed. 

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
5,868 posts

There's no need to compensate free ships (especially if the nerf was as insignificant as this). If somebody paid for a free ship, that's their problem. Should people get refunds for italian tech tree battleships that they bought in early access if they get nerfed?

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OGHF2]
Players
4,054 posts
5,647 battles
17 hours ago, Zuikaku4586 said:

Is there any chance that we could see some more camos for USS Alaska. Currently all we have is the default and Halloween perma camos. 

You mean something like a tropical island ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SVX]
Players
1,850 posts
20,871 battles
13 hours ago, hellhound666 said:

you can repeat their mantra till end of the days - they still changed the fcking prem ships and it would be an honorable thing to do. of course, it is funny to seek honour from Russia based company where fcking client till it moves is normal thing to do

not a russian company but ok!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RAIN]
Players
1,433 posts
22,012 battles
Il y a 13 heures, hellhound666 a dit :

pretty obvious imo ... it's battle ability got severely reduced with skill rework, so compensation is in order

Really ???...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SVX]
Players
1,850 posts
20,871 battles
4 minutes ago, hellhound666 said:

didn't you notice?

lesta is owned by wg and wg is a Belorussian company! (not russian)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,978 posts
1 hour ago, albin322 said:

lesta is owned by wg and wg is a Belorussian company! (not russian)

such fine details ... but the game is managed by lesta and wg does not interfere much. moreover, things turned worse for plyers when wg decided to interfere less

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SKRUB]
Players
654 posts
29,465 battles
35 minutes ago, hellhound666 said:

such fine details ... but the game is managed by lesta and wg does not interfere much. moreover, things turned worse for plyers when wg decided to interfere less

 

And your point is ?

Only this guy can be a game programmer for you ?

 

happy-feet-le-manchot-de-nouvelle-zeland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SKRUB]
Players
654 posts
29,465 battles

Than i don't care if wows was made by russians or americans.

And Alaska is probably the best T9 cruiser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×